Archive for July 21st, 2010

Jul
21

US charges man with supporting Somali militants

by , under NEWS
US charges man with supporting Somali militants

US authorities have charged a man with providing material support to Somali Islamist militant group al-Shabab.
Zachary Adam Chesser, 20, was detained on 10 July as he tried to board a flight to Uganda.
He allegedly told federal agents he had twice tried to go to Somalia to join al-Shabab, which the State Department designated a terrorist group in 2008.
Al-Shabab has taken control of large parts of Somalia and claims to have links with al-Qaeda.

  • “This case exposes the disturbing reality that extreme radicalisation can happen anywhere, including Northern Virginia,” said US Attorney Neil MacBride.
    “This young man is accused of seeking to join the Shabab, a brutal terrorist organisation with ties to al-Qaeda. These allegations underscore the need for continued vigilance against homegrown terror threats.”
    Mr Chesser was also named in court papers as Abu Talhah al-Amrikee.
    He allegedly told investigating agents that he maintained several online profiles dedicated to extremist jihad propaganda.
    US investigators alleged that Mr Chesser was a follower of radical US-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a radical American Muslim cleric of Yemeni descent who is believed to be in Yemen with al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
    Mr al-Awlaki is suspected of helping plan the attempted bombing of an airliner over Detroit last Christmas.
    Mr Chesser reportedly posted an online warning in April that the creators of the South Park cartoon risked death for an episode that included a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad in a bear suit.
    Al-Shabab wants to impose a strict version of Sharia law in Somalia, where they control most of the south and centre of the country. The fragile UN-backed government only controls parts of the capital, Mogadishu.
    There have been numerous reports of foreign jihadis flocking to Somalia to join the group.

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Alex Salmond writes to US over Lockerbie bomber Megrahi

    by , under NEWS
    Alex Salmond writes to US over Lockerbie bomber Megrahi

    Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond has written to the US senators who are calling for an inquiry into the release of the Lockerbie bomber.
    Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the man convicted over the 1988 atrocity in which 270 people died, was released by the Scottish government in August 2009.
    Mr Salmond said the Scottish government made the decision on “compassionate grounds” as Megrahi is terminally ill.
    He said there were no representations from oil giant BP on the matter.
    Libyan Megrahi is the only man to have been convicted of the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on 21 December 1988.

  • He was released from a Scottish prison having been given three months to live but is still alive almost a year later.
    Some US senators suspect that BP lobbied for Megrahi's release to aid its chances of getting oil deals with Libya.
    UK Prime Minister David Cameron, on a visit to the US, said the decision to free Megrahi on compassionate grounds was “completely wrong”.
    However, he said he had seen no evidence the Scottish government had been “swayed” by lobbying from BP.
    Scotland's first minister has now written to John Kerry, chairman of the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
    Mr Salmond said the decision to release Megrahi was made with “integrity” and following a “clear legal process”.
    He wrote: “I can say unequivocally that the Scottish government has never, at any point, received any representations from BP in relation to al-Megrahi.”
    Mr Salmond has previously criticised former UK prime minister Tony Blair for negotiating a prisoner transfer agreement (PTA) with Libya in 2007.
    The agreement, which was not invoked for Megrahi's release, gave rise to suspicions of “deals in the desert”, Mr Salmond said.
    In the letter to the US senators, Mr Salmond repeated his opposition to the prisoner transfer agreement.
    He said: “As was highlighted last year, the Scottish government rejected the application for transfer of al-Megrahi under the PTA specifically on the basis that the US government and families of victims in the United States had been led to believe that such a prisoner transfer would not be possible for anyone convicted of the Lockerbie atrocity.
    “If your committee is concerned about BP's role or the PTA then it is BP and the previous UK administration that should be the focus of your inquiries.”
    Mr Salmond added: “There is nothing the Scottish government can add to this since we have had no contact with BP at any point in the process of considering al-Megrahi's position.”

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Searching for the Gulf oil leaks victims

    by , under NEWS
    Searching for the Gulf oil leaks victims

    A combination of favourable winds, helpful currents and the clean-up operation has meant that no fresh oil has reached these particular waters for five weeks. Other places have been hit instead.
    It is a feature of this spill that the slicks are patchy and mobile, and only reach the shores occasionally.
    For the pelicans we are watching, the conditions are still threatening.
    Tom explains how, if oil coats the rocks, the birds can walk on it, try to clean it off and then ingest it with fatal consequences.
    While we are talking, a shout goes up when one of the officials spots a pelican that is unusually dark. It is stained with oil: a victim.
    It beats its wings to get airborne, but the oil weighs it down and we watch the pitiful sight of its failed attempt to fly.
    The members of the rescue team debate the merits of trying to catch the bird; there's always the risk of causing more harm than good by disturbing other birds and nests.
    In the end, a decision is taken to attempt a capture, and two boats manoeuvre close to the pelican. It tries to take off again.
    Wildlife official Mike Pixley reaches out with a net but misses. But then, on a second go, he manages to scoop the stricken bird.
    It is caged and taken at high speed to a treatment centre. It should survive, along with some 1,282 oiled birds rescued in all so far.
    A further 969 have been found dead. These are the official figures up to 20 July.
    The numbers may seem surprisingly low, given all the talk of catastrophe. They are certainly small compared to the hundreds of thousands of birds estimated to have died in the Exxon Valdez disaster in 1989.
    So how serious is this BP spill?
    Experts agree that it's too early to come to a definite conclusion – there's a lot of oil still out at sea. But they are divided on the impact so far.
    Professor Paul Kemp of the Audubon Society, a leading conservation charity, believes the region is under threat anyway and that the leak's impact has been exaggerated.”The brown pelican population has taken a hit but we're not concerned about losing all of them,” he says.
    “We had maybe 4-5 periods of a day or so in which we got oil in Louisiana. Most of time it's not coming ashore, it's not a continuous thing, and when it did come ashore it came as patches.”
    Professor Christopher D'Elia of Louisiana State University sounds more alarmed.
    “There are lot of unknowns. The geographical extent and the duration of this spill has been so long that it's very hard to say what's going to happen.
    “It's so complex with dispersant used, things going on to the oil before it gets there, some good, some not so good.
    “Will it get there as large gobs of heavier fractions? Or are there small droplets getting in and interfering with the food chain? We just don't know.”
    Meanwhile the patient, uncertain work of hunting for the victims continues. I ask Tom Mackenzie how long that mission is likely to go on for.
    “Who knows?” he says. “Months; maybe longer.”

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Jul
    21

    United Airlines plane hits turbulence injuring 30

    by , under NEWS
    United Airlines plane hits turbulence injuring 30

    Thirty people were injured when a United Airlines jet hit “heavy turbulence” over Kansas.
    The Boeing 777 was flying from Washington to Los Angeles at 34,000ft (10,000m) when it hit trouble.
    A female passenger was jolted out of her seat so forcefully that she left a crack when she hit the side of the cabin, AP news agency reports.
    Following the incident on Tuesday, flight 967 was diverted to Denver where it landed safely and was met by medics.
    A spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration said 26 passengers and four crew members were injured, one of whom was critically hurt. He gave no further details.
    The turbulence was “just a huge up and down,” according to passenger Kaoma Bechaz, a 19-year-old Australian.She told the Denver Post that the woman sitting next to her had hit her head on the side of the cabin, leaving a crack above the window, and a girl across the aisle flew into the air and hit the ceiling.
    Ms Bechaz said she was not thrown around because her seat belt was tight.
    The plane took off again from Denver later on Tuesday and completed its journey to Los Angeles International Airport, where relatives were waiting to greet the passengers.
    It was the third time this year that passengers on a United Airlines flight were hurt because of turbulence.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Bernanke: US economy faces uncertain time

    by , under NEWS
    Bernanke: US economy faces uncertain time

    US Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has warned that the outlook for the US economy remains “unusually uncertain”.
    In testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, Mr Bernanke said record low interest rates would still be needed to support economic recovery.
    The Fed was also prepared to step in with “further policy actions” to boost the economy if needed, he added.
    But he downplayed fears that the US could re-enter recession.
    Some economists have questioned whether a withdrawal of economic stimulus measures could harm the US economy's recovery.
    “Even as the Federal Reserve continues prudent planning for the ultimate withdrawal of monetary policy accommodation, we also recognise that the economic outlook remains unusually uncertain,” Mr Bernanke said, in prepared testimony.
    “[But] rising demand from households and businesses should help sustain growth,” he added.
    The head of the US central bank reiterated an earlier pledge to keep interest rates at their current historical lows for “an extended period”.
    Interest rates have been held at between 0% and 0.25% – a move designed to boost lending and spending – since the depths of the financial crisis in 2008.
    Inflation was less of a concern, Mr Bernanke also told the committee, with the Fed expecting inflation to remain “subdued over the next several years”.
    The US economy grew at an annualised rate of 2.7% in the first quarter of the year, having emerged from recession last year.
    But high unemployment and a slowdown in manufacturing have raised concerns that the recovery is faltering.
    Mr Bernanke said that although the Fed would “review its options” if the recovery weakened further, no specific measures were currently being considered for the short-term.
    “In short, it look likes our economy is in need of additional help,” remarked the head of the committee, Senator Chris Dodd.
    Investors on Wall Street reacted negatively to the comments, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1.3%.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    White House sorry for Shirley Sherrod racism firing

    by , under NEWS
    White House sorry for Shirley Sherrod racism firing

    Share this page White House sorry for Shirley Sherrod 'racism' firing The White House has apologised to a black US official fired after a video clip appeared to show her making charged remarks about a white farmer.
    Agriculture department official Shirley Sherrod was exonerated in the full video, which surfaced soon after she was sacked.
    White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the apology reflected “the feelings” of President Barack Obama.
    “Decisions were made based on an incomplete set of facts,” he said.
    He said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was trying to telephone Mrs Sherrod to apologise.
    In the edited video clip, Mrs Sherrod appears to say that in 1986 she did not give a Georgia farmer all the assistance she could to save his farm because black farmers were losing their land and he was white.
    In Shirley Sherrod's bruising 24 hours at the heart of the frantic American news spin cycle, she found herself condemned by the black civil rights group which hosted the meeting where she spoke and then forced to resign by government officials who said they were acting on behalf of the White House.
    No-one in government or in the civil rights movement bothered to ask what she'd actually said or ask for her side of the story.
    If they had, they would have found in Shirley Sherrod a woman who had risen above personal tragedy to work for black and white farmers alike.
    Whatever happens to Mrs Sherrod the case demonstrates that in Obama's America the issue of race isn't getting any less sensitive.
    More importantly, it catches politicians in a moment of slavish and ill-considered over-reaction to the demands of the age of continuous news.
    Mrs Sherrod said the video, first posted on a conservative website, lacked context and was part of a larger story about learning from her mistakes and racial reconciliation, not racism.
    She also complained the department fired her without listening to her explanation.
    Mrs Sherrod was videoed giving a speech in March at a dinner of a Georgia chapter of the NAACP, a prominent civil rights group.
    The clip was picked up on by conservatives as evidence of anti-white racism in President Barack Obama's government and within the NAACP, an organisation seen as Democratic-leaning.
    Mrs Sherrod was promptly sacked, her remarks condemned by the administration and the NAACP.
    'Backlash'
    But the video of her full speech, which surfaced on Tuesday evening, shows her explaining she learned from the incident that poverty, not race, is the key factor in rural development. She also said she ultimately worked hard to save the farmer's land.
    “Working with him made me see that it's really about those who have versus those who haven't,” she told the NAACP in March.
    “They could be black, they could be white, they could be Hispanic. And it made me realise then that I needed to help poor people – those who don't have access the way others have.”
    The NAACP said the organisation had been “duped” by conservative groups.
    “We have come to the conclusion we were snookered … into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias,” President Benjamin Todd Jealous said in a statement.
    “It makes me feel better that the apology is finally coming,” Mrs Sherrod said after the White House apologised. “I accept their apology.”
    In interviews on Tuesday Mrs Sherrod complained that government officials would not heed her explanation and accused them of ousting her because they were afraid of a conservative media backlash.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Obama signs sweeping US financial reform into law

    by , under NEWS
    Obama signs sweeping US financial reform into law

    Share this page Obama signs sweeping US financial reform into law President Barack Obama has signed into law the biggest overhaul of American financial regulation in decades.
    The president said the law will ensure “that everyone follows the same set of rules, so that firms compete on price and quality, not tricks and traps”.
    The law is a major victory for Mr Obama and the Democrats, who passed it with little Republican support after months of political wrangling.
    It was vehemently opposed by the financial services industry.
    The law tightens mortgage and consumer lending rules, improves disclosure for student borrowers and average investors and establishes a new consumer protection agency, among other provisions.
    Almost every Congressional Republican opposed the bill, saying its new regulations would prove burdensome to businesses trying to create jobs.
    The bill “fails to address the root causes of the kind of crisis it's meant to prevent”, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said last week.
    “This is a bill that creates a vast new and unaccountable bureaucracy that, if past experience is any guide, will lead to countless burdensome, unintended consequences for individuals and small businesses, that will constrict credit and stifle growth in the middle of the worst economic period in memory.”
    Several provisions are intended to eliminate government bailouts by dealing with an issue known as “too big to fail”, where a financial firm cannot be allowed to collapse because of the wider damage it would do.
    There are provisions to enable regulators to shut down a failing large firm in an orderly manner and others intended to curtail their size in the first place.
    These and other measures probably do reduce the risks of bailouts being needed, but in the end, future governments will most likely come to the rescue if the danger to the wider economy seems great.
    For critics, the big omission is the two housing finance companies, known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were rescued by the government and which had some role in the crisis. The administration plans to reform them later.
    But Mr Obama described the bill as a necessary measure to prevent future economic disaster, saying world's current economic troubles were caused in large part by “a breakdown in our financial system” and “a failure of responsibility from certain corners of Wall Street to the halls of power in Washington”.
    “Our financial system only works – our markets are only free – when there are clear rules and basic safeguards that prevent abuse, that check excess, that ensure that it is more profitable to play by the rules than to game the system,” Mr Obama said at the White House.
    In a note of irony, Obama signed the bill with great fanfare in the massive Ronald Reagan Building, named after a president who championed deregulation.
    To a burst of applause, the president said: “Because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes.”

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    US reviewing dismissal of Shirley Sherrod for 'racism'

    by , under NEWS
    US reviewing dismissal of Shirley Sherrod for 'racism'

    Share this page US reviewing dismissal of Shirley Sherrod for 'racism' A black US official fired after a video clip appeared to show her making racially-tinged remarks about a white farmer may be reinstated.
    Agriculture department official Shirley Sherrod appears to be exonerated in the full video, which surfaced soon after she was sacked.
    On Wednesday morning, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said he would reconsider the decision to oust her.
    Mr Vilsack said he was willing to review “additional facts”.
    Mrs Sherrod said the video first posted on a conservative website lacked context and was part of a larger story about learning from her mistakes and racial reconciliation, not racism.
    In Shirley Sherrod's bruising 24 hours at the heart of the frantic American news spin cycle, she found herself condemned by the black civil rights group which hosted the meeting where she spoke and then forced to resign by government officials who said they were acting on behalf of the White House.
    No-one in government or in the civil rights movement bothered to ask what she'd actually said or ask for her side of the story.
    If they had, they would have found in Shirley Sherrod a woman who had risen above personal tragedy to work for black and white farmers alike.
    Whatever happens to Mrs Sherrod the case demonstrates that in Obama's America the issue of race isn't getting any less sensitive.
    More importantly, it catches politicians in a moment of slavish and ill-considered over-reaction to the demands of the age of continuous news.
    She also complained the department fired her without listening to her explanation.
    In the edited video clip, Mrs Sherrod appears to say that in 1986 she did not give a Georgia farmer all the assistance she could to save his farm because black farmers were losing their land and he was white.
    She was speaking at a March dinner of a Georgia chapter of the NAACP, a prominent civil rights group.
    The clip was seen by conservatives as evidence of anti-white racism in President Barack Obama's government and within the NAACP, an organisation seen as Democratic-leaning.
    Mrs Sherrod was promptly sacked, her remarks condemned by the administration and the NAACP.
    In interviews on Tuesday Mrs Sherrod complained that government officials would not heed her explanation and accused them of ousting her because they were afraid of a conservative media backlash.
    The video of her full speech, which surfaced on Tuesday evening, shows her explaining she learned from the incident that poverty, not race, is the key factor in rural development. She also said she ultimately worked hard to save the farmer's land.
    “Working with him made me see that it's really about those who have versus those who haven't,” she told the NAACP in March.
    “They could be black, they could be white, they could be Hispanic. And it made me realise then that I needed to help poor people – those who don't have access the way others have.”
    The NAACP said the organisation had been “duped” by conservative groups.
    “We have come to the conclusion we were snookered … into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias,” President Benjamin Todd Jealous said in a statement.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    CocaCola profits boosted by international sales

    by , under NEWS
    CocaCola profits boosted by international sales

    Coca-Cola has reported strong second-quarter profits, beating market expectations, thanks to rising international sales.
    Total profits were 2.37bn (1.56bn), up 16% from a year ago and narrowly above forecasts of 2.3bn.
    The beverage maker's share price jumped 2.3% in the first 15 minutes of New York trading.
    Revenues were up 4.8% to 8.67bn, thanks to rapid sales growth in Latin America, Africa and parts of Asia.
    Among the best growth markets were Brazil, where sales volumes were up 13%, and India, up 22% since last year.
    The producer of Fanta, Sprite and Vitamin Water also reported a pick-up in growth – albeit at a more sedate 2% pace – in its home market of North America.
    In Europe, however, sales were down 1%.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Tributes to Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan

    by , under NEWS
    Tributes to Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan

    Share this page Tributes to Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan A Canadian soldier killed in Afghanistan on Tuesday has been hailed as remarkable and dedicated.
    Sapper Brian Collier, 24, was killed in an IED attack near Kandahar.
    “The bravery and remarkable commitment of Canadians like Sapper Collier are bringing safety and stability to the people of Afghanistan,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said
    He had recently been wounded in a mine blast, and was the 151st Canadian to die in Afghanistan since 2002.
    Collier, a combat engineer from Bradford, Ontario, was killed while on a foot patrol about 15km southwest of the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar, the Canadian department of national defence said in a statement.
    “Sapper Brian Collier was a remarkable Canadian and a dedicated soldier,” defence minister Peter MacKay said in a statement. “He made the ultimate sacrifice for our country and has earned the recognition and the respect of us all.”
    Collier had recently been wounded in another IED attack, but “fought hard to overcome his injury in order to get back to doing his job with his comrades”, Brig Gen Jonathan Vance, commander of Task Force Kandahar told reporters.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Tycoon Conrad Black to be freed on $2m bail

    by , under NEWS
    Tycoon Conrad Black to be freed on $2m bail

    A US judge has ordered Canadian-born tycoon Conrad Black to be released from prison on bail, pending an appeal against his fraud conviction.
    Black, a British peer, is being freed on a 2m (1.3m) bond more than two years into a six-and-a-half year term.
    The newspaper mogul will have to appear in a Chicago court before being freed.
    Black and three other former executives of Hollinger International were convicted in 2007 of defrauding shareholders of 6.1m.
    The peer was held in a minimum security prison in Coleman, Florida.

  • 1944 – Born in Montreal, Canada
  • 1966 – Buys first newspaper, the Eastern Townships Advertiser in Quebec
  • 2001 – Ennobled as Lord Black of Crossharbour after giving up his Canadian citizenship
  • November 2005 – Charged in the US along with three associates with 11 counts of fraud, one of obstruction of justice, and one of racketeering
  • July 2007 – Found guilty of three counts of criminal fraud and obstruction of justice, but cleared of racketeering and wire fraud
  • December 2007 – Sentenced to 78 months in jail, fined 125,000 and ordered to forfeit 6.1m
  • March 2008 – Begins serving sentence in low-security prison in Florida
  • June 2010 – US Supreme Court weakens “honest services” law central to fraud conviction
  • July 2010 – Granted bail by US appeals court
  • Black and the other convicted executives were found to have paid themselves tax-free bonuses from the sale of newspaper assets without the approval of the company's board.
    In addition, Black was convicted on one count of obstructing justice, after being recorded on videotape removing documents from his office in Toronto after US regulators had informed him he was under investigation.
    He has always denied any wrongdoing.
    Black's release was preceded by a Supreme Court ruling on one of the laws used to convict him. It said the three counts of fraud were based on a vague piece of US law that was interpreted too broadly by the prosecution.
    Under Black's leadership, Hollinger became one of the largest media companies in the world, acquiring the Chicago Sun-Times, the UK's Daily Telegraph, the Jerusalem Post and hundreds of community papers in the US and Canada.
    Black, born in 1944 in Montreal, renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2001 so he could become a member of the House of Lords.

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Lindsay Lohan feeds 'insatiable' media demand

    by , under NEWS
    Lindsay Lohan feeds 'insatiable' media demand

    Share this page Lindsay Lohan feeds 'insatiable' media demand Lindsay Lohan has become the latest Hollywood star to have her private life played out in the public spotlight.
    Yet the blanket media coverage of her recent travails is a far cry from Hollywood's so-called 'Golden Age', when stars were venerated and their indiscretions overlooked.
    Silent movie star Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle not only survived charges that he killed a young starlet but was in the process of rebuilding his career at the time of his death.
    Being accused of raping two teenage girls, meanwhile, did not prevent Errol Flynn bouncing back and becoming more popular than ever.
    “For a long time agents and publicists wielded great power,” says Professor Leo Braudy, cultural historian and author of The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History.

  • 1921: Roscoe 'Fatty' Arbuckle accused of killing starlet Virginia Rappe
  • 1942: Errol Flynn accused of raping two teenage girls
  • 1949: Robert Mitchum sent to jail for possessing marijuana
  • 1996: Robert Downey Jr arrested for possession of drugs & a handgun
    “They served as gatekeepers to the stars, and reporters wanted to keep them sweet in the hope of gaining greater access.
    “In the last few years all that has changed,” he continues. “Now we're obsessed with finding out what is going on behind the scenes.”
    One only has to look at the media frenzy surrounding actor Mel Gibson to see that nothing is now off limits – even if that includes private telephone conversations.
    Alleged recordings of Gibson threatening his former girlfriend, posted on the US website Radar Online, could cost the Braveheart star more than access to the couple's eight-month-old child.
    Some believe his entire career is at stake and that the bad publicity generated by the tapes could make it difficult for him to find work in Hollywood again.
    As deference to the stars has apparently diminished, intrusion by the paparazzi has intensified.Indeed, their ubiquity in Los Angeles is such that the so-called 'stalkerazzi' have transformed the media landscape.
    According to Melanie Bromley, west coast bureau chief of Us weekly, it has become increasingly difficult to hold onto an exclusive story.
    “There was a time when we would get word of something on Friday and could hang on to it until the following Wednesday when the magazine hit the news stands,” she explains.
    “Now there's very little chance it will keep over the weekend. The news cycle simply moves so fast.”
    Chloe Millar is west coast picture editor at WENN (World Entertainment News Network) and assigned five photographers to Lindsay Lohan's court surrender.
    With back-up from nearly a dozen freelancers, she was confident the agency had every location covered.
    “It's become an increasingly cut-throat business,” she tells the BBC News website.
    “With so many people getting basically the same picture, it's come down to a race to get your shot out first.”The picture every agency wants to land is a shot of the 24-year-old star in handcuffs.
    “An exclusive picture like that would mean big bucks for whoever took it,” says Millar.
    “We could be talking hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
    Such is the overcrowding in California's jails that Lohan is expected to serve only a fraction of her 90-day sentence for probation violation.
    Until she is released, she will be away from the prying eyes of the journalists whose life-blood she has become.
    Who will they turn to to plug the void? According to Millar there will be no shortage of candidates.
    “The supermarket tabloids and TV shows still have plenty of space to fill,” she says.
    “With Lindsay under lock and key, we'll just have to find someone else.”
    Brandy Navarre, managing editor of leading LA photo agency X17, sums up the market in one word: “Insatiable.”

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Dangers in the dust: Inside the global asbestos trade

    by , under NEWS
    Dangers in the dust: Inside the global asbestos trade

    The BBC and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) reveal the truth about asbestos use across four continents, and a global network of industry groups that has spent millions of dollars to promote it.

  • The Jeffrey asbestos mine in Quebec is an astonishing sight. “Big and beautiful,” says one of the regular flow of tourists and locals who peer into its depths from a public observation deck.
    Kites glide above the tiny azure pool far below.
    Elsewhere in Quebec Province, Janice Tomkins, an amateur watercolourist, is painting birds for the first time. She does not know how many more she will paint because she has mesothelioma – a rare illness linked to asbestos.
    Janice believes she is ill because of exposure decades ago to blue and brown asbestos – forms of the mineral now banned.
    What is mined in Quebec is a different kind of asbestos – white asbestos or chrysotile – the only kind now used commercially worldwide. Countries like Russia, China, Brazil, and India – although not Canada – use it widely as a cheap and effective building material.
    The president of the mine, Bernard Coulombe, told us their chrysotile is “sold exclusively to end-users having the same industrial hygiene practices as Canada,” and said the federal and provincial governments have proof this is the case.
    But, despite still being mined in Quebec, white asbestos is now banned or restricted in some 52 countries, on the grounds that any form of asbestos can cause devastating illnesses like Janice's.
    Many scientists fear the continued use of asbestos could significantly prolong a global epidemic of asbestos-related illnesses that began when blue and brown asbestos were legal. The WHO says white asbestos “is a known cause of human cancer,” including mesothelioma.
    Dr Vincent Cogliano, of the WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer says: “My own personal view is that these risks are extremely high. They are as high as just about any known carcinogen that we have seen, except, perhaps, for tobacco smoke.
    “Any exposure is going to prolong the asbestos epidemic – continued export and continued use of chrysotile will increase the incidence of lung cancer and mesothelioma for many decades to come, he said.” Janice does not want the Quebec provincial government to approve a C58m (US56m, 37m) loan guarantee that would enable the Jeffrey Mine to boost exports to developing nations such as India.
    Defenders of chrysotile insist safe use can prevent any ill effects including cancer – and some argue there's no link to mesothelioma at all.
    But there is now a crescendo of opposition to Canadian asbestos exports.
    At Janice's hospital in Montreal, Dr Dick Menzies has signed a letter telling the government there is an “overwhelming scientific consensus” that white asbestos use must end.
    He is just one of many prominent physicians, academics and others who have besieged the federal and provincial governments with letters of protest.
    The WHO says 125 million people encounter white asbestos in the workplace, and the International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that 100,000 workers die each year from all asbestos-related diseases.
    The president of the mine told us he did not believe these figures were true.
    White asbestos is banned in the European Union, with minor exemptions. In the US it is legal but the industry has paid out an estimated 70bn in damages and litigation costs, and asbestos use is limited to automobile and aircraft brakes, gaskets and a few other products.
    Backed by a global network of trade groups and scientists, the asbestos industry has depicted the epidemic as a legacy of a darker time, when dust levels were high, blue and brown asbestos were used, and workers had little, if any, protection from the toxic asbestos fibres.
    “All recent scientific studies show that chrysotile fibres, the only asbestos fibre that is produced and exported from Canada, can be used safely under controlled conditions,” said Christian Paradis, environment minister in Canada's conservative government.
    In 2009, Canada sent nearly 153,000 tonnes of chrysotile – or white asbestos – abroad. More than half went to India; the rest went to Indonesia, Thailand, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates. At home, it is a different story: Canada used only 6,000 tonnes in 2006, the last year for which data is available.
    The BBC's One Planet programme visited Kali Gaon in the Indian city of Ahmedabad, where it found families living in homes with cracked sheets of white asbestos. They families said they were aware of the dangers but were too poor to move. Listen to the report on the World Service on 22 July.
  • In the developing world, demand for cheap building materials is brisk. More than two million tonnes of asbestos were mined worldwide in 2009 – much of it to be turned into asbestos cement, which is durable, fireproof and cheap, for corrugated roofing and water pipes. More than half was exported.
    Behind the industry's growth in these countries is a marketing campaign involving a diverse set of companies, organised under a dozen trade associations and institutes. This campaign is co-ordinated, in part, by the Chrysotile Institute, a government-backed group in Montreal, which has an office in a smart office block in downtown Montreal.
    The BBC did not get past the office block reception desk, but in a telephone interview with ICIJ in February, institute president Clement Godbout insisted: “We never said that chrysotile was not dangerous. We said that chrysotile is a product with potential risk and it has to be controlled. It's not something that you put in your coffee every morning.”
    The asbestos lobby's influence reaches around the world. Pro-chrysotile groups have spent nearly US100m since the mid-1980s to support asbestos sales in three countries alone: Canada, India and Brazil.
    Critics say the groups' strategy is one borrowed from the tobacco industry: create doubt, contest litigation, and delay regulation. Some industry-funded researchers have published hundreds of scientific papers saying that chrysotile can be used safely. White asbestos, they argue, is significantly less hazardous than brown or blue asbestos, which the industry stopped mining in the 1990s.
    Claims made by this small but vocal minority of scientists include that white asbestos fibres:
  • are rapidly and harmlessly expelled by the lungs
  • can be safely embedded in cement
  • have no connection with mesothelioma at all, even if there are possible links to lung cancer
    White asbestos is an occupational health issue, they argue, rather than a potential public health disaster. So it is wrong, they say, to deny cheap building materials to developing countries for what are unproven, and at worst highly marginal, health risks.
    Dr John Hoskins, an independent consultant toxicologist specialising in occupational hygiene with particular reference to asbestos, believes ambitious politicians and litigation lawyers are among those orchestrating a campaign against white asbestos that is scaring the public and “committing economic damage”.
    “You have a cheap product which actually does a good job,” says Dr Hoskins, who says he formed his views while working for the UK's Medical Research Council. “I think there's an immeasurably small risk and immeasurably small means it cannot be measured.”
    But arguments that white asbestos – more than 90% of all asbestos ever mined – can be safely used are disputed by the majority of scientists and public health officials we have spoken to.
    The American Public Health Association (APHA) has joined the World Federation of Public Health Organizations (WFPHA), the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH), and the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) in calling for a global asbestos ban.
    From China to India, from Mexico to Brazil, compelling recent evidence, and on-the-ground inquiries, indicate how elusive the goal of controlled use can be – whether it is illegal gaskets seized in Brazil, clouds of asbestos dust in Indian workshops, or a Chinese reporter stumbling into a family workshop where workers have inadequate protection.
    As for the risk-benefit question, American Barry Castleman, author of Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, has been researching asbestos cement substitutes – roofing and pipes made with cellulose fibres, ductile iron and fibreglass, for example – for the WHO. He says they cost, at most, 10% to 15% more to produce.
    Despite the reassuring studies and the million-dollar marketing efforts, the asbestos industry faces stiffening headwinds.
    The number of countries imposing bans or restrictions continues to climb, and health and labour activists have sprung up in China, Brazil, India, and other high-use countries. In Brazil, one civil servant said there is now a debate raging inside the federal government about white asbestos – the use of which is permitted in most, but not all, states.
    And recently, the scientific case against white asbestos may be hardening.
    John Hodgson of the UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has estimated the risk of lung cancer from white asbestos is between 10 and 50 times less than from the same exposure to banned blue and brown (amphibole) asbestos. But he said new evidence from the US had led him to conclude his previous estimates of mesothelioma risk could need revising upwards to “between a 20th and a 100th” of blue and brown risk.
    You can listen to Steve Bradshaw's report on the World Service's Discovery programme on 21 July, or watch his Dangers in the Dust – Inside the Global Asbestos Trade on BBC World TV on 24 July.
  • “I would say that we can't say it's safe,” he said, adding that there are very serious levels of uncertainty over these figures – especially at lower exposure levels. The HSE actively supports the EU's white asbestos ban.
    Meanwhile, on lung cancer, Alex Burdorf, a public health professor at Rotterdam's Erasmus Medical Centre, said his recent review of earlier epidemiological studies commissioned by the Dutch government, had convinced him that white asbestos was “much more dangerous than previously thought.”
    “What we have shown is that chrysotile is as dangerous as crocidolite [blue asbestos] for contracting lung cancer, and is also linked to mesothelioma,” he said. “I don't think there is safe way of working with asbestos, so I would support a global ban on asbestos purely because of public health risks.”
    The one thing almost everyone seems to agree on is that little is known about what is actually happening in many countries that still use asbestos.
    “Good epidemiology on worker cohorts still using chrysotile could be very helpful,” said John Hodgson.
    “Whether it's ethical to suggest we should wait and see, rather than working for a ban in those countries one might debate. If countries do decide to continue using chrysotile they should have good systems of monitoring exposure and subsequent illness and mortality, so if they're wrong in their judgement this will emerge as quickly as possible.”
    In its joint investigation the BBC/ICIJ found little evidence that such comprehensive monitoring is yet widely in place.Jim Morris, is a staff writer for the ICIJ, specialises in coverage of the environment and public health. Steve Bradshaw is an award-winning documentary film-maker.

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Morgan Stanley sees profit surge

    by , under NEWS
    Morgan Stanley sees profit surge

    US bank Morgan Stanley saw a stronger than expected profit in the three months to the end of June, despite weakness elsewhere in the sector.
    The Wall Street giant made a net profit of 1.4bn (917m) compared with a loss of 138m in the same period last year.
    Its shares were up 2.7% in pre-market trading on the results.
    On Tuesday, Goldman Sachs disappointed investors after reporting a sharp fall in profits after being hit by the UK's bonus tax, a US fine and poor trading.
    Morgan Stanley said employee compensation for the quarter – which included the bonus pool – was 3.9bn.
    But it said it had set aside 361m to cover the cost of a one-off tax on bonuses paid to UK employees.
    Meanwhile, another Wall Street stalwart, Wells Fargo, reported its quarterly net profit fell slightly to 3.1bn from 3.2bn a year earlier.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Two men 'steal' Neil Armstrong's customs form

    by , under NEWS
    Two men 'steal' Neil Armstrong's customs form

    Two men have been charged with stealing a customs form from Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon.
    Prosecutors say the pair then attempted to sell the document, which contained Mr Armstrong's address, birth date, and signature, on an auction website.
    A complaint filed in US district court in Boston, Massachusetts said one of the men was working at a Boston airport in March when Armstrong passed through.
    The man allegedly helped Mr Armstrong, but did not properly file the form.
    Mr Armstrong recently returned from a trip overseas to boost morale and support of US troops serving abroad.
    The complaint said the bidding began in May for Mr Armstrong's signature with an offer of 200 (131) and topped 1,026 before the online company stopped the bidding in response to a bidder's concerns.
    If the men, who are from the US state of Massachusetts, are convicted, they could both face up to 10 years in prison and a 250,000 fine.
    Tuesday marked the 41st anniversary of Mr Armstrong becoming the first man to walk on the moon.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    David Cameron presents Barack Obama with graffiti art

    by , under NEWS
    David Cameron presents Barack Obama with graffiti art

    A painting by a graffiti artist was among the official gifts to Barack Obama from David Cameron on his first trip to Washington as prime minister.
    The work, Twenty First Century City, is by Ben Eine, said to be one of the PM's wife Samantha's favourite artists.
    The 39-year-old artist recently sprayed the entire alphabet on shop shutters in a London street.
    Mr Obama continued the art theme by presenting the Camerons with a signed lithograph by pop artist Ed Ruscha.
    The piece, Column with Speed Lines, was chosen for its red, white and blue colours matching the British and American flags.
    Writing on his website, Ben Eine said it had been a “weird day” because “David Cameron has given one of my paintings to President Obama in an art swap”.
    The artist, who has worked with Banksy, began his career by “tagging” his name on buildings and trains around east London, examples of which are featured on his website under the heading “vandalism”.
    In recent years he has been asked to decorate shutters in cities as far afield as Tokyo and New York.
    Other gifts from the Camerons to the Obamas included two pairs of Hunter Wellington boots, one in pink and one in purple, for the first family's two daughters.
    For Michelle Obama, there were candles made by London-based perfumer Miller Harris.Mr Cameron's six-year-old daughter Nancy was given a silver charm necklace, and his son Elwen, four, was a given a DC United football shirt.
    Samantha Cameron, who is expecting a child in September, received a gift basket including a baby blanket.
    When Mr Cameron met President Obama at the G8 summit in Tokyo last month, they exchanged bottles of beer, following a bet on England's World Cup clash with the US, which ended in a 1-1 draw.
    The US president presented Mr Cameron with a bottle of Goose Island 312 from his home city of Chicago, while Mr Cameron gave Obama a bottle of Hobgoblin, made by the Wychwood brewery in his Oxfordshire constituency.
    Swapping notes on the beers at a White House news conference on Tuesday, Mr Obama said the British bitter was excellent but confessed: “I did drink it cold.”
    Mr Cameron joked that the American beer “was obviously very effective” because he had ended up cheering on Germany against Argentina while drinking it, “something that's a big admission for a British person”.
    Mr Obama was criticised for lack of thought when he presented previous prime minister Gordon Brown with a set of 25 DVDs of classic American films, when Mr Brown visited Washington.
    Mr Brown gave the US president a pen holder made from the timbers of a Victorian anti-slavery ship.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    BP relief well 'days from completion' as cap stays shut

    by , under NEWS
    BP relief well 'days from completion' as cap stays shut

    Hope is rising that the ruptured Gulf of Mexico oil well may be sealed for good in weeks after it was announced a relief well was nearly complete.
    US crisis manager Adm Thad Allen said the tunnelling should finally reach BP's broken well by the weekend and he was “pleased with the progress”.
    After fears for the stability of a cap BP put on the well, he said the risk of a new blowout now seemed minimal.
    Seepage detected from the sea floor was traced back to a different well.
    The cap applied last Thursday stopped oil leaking from the well for the first time since the explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig on 20 April which caused the disaster.
    Eleven workers on the BP-leased rig were killed and the oil caused one of America's worst environmental crises.
    Vast amounts of oil have entered the Gulf and BP says the cost of dealing with the spill has now reached nearly 4bn (2.6bn).
    BP has moved to sell assets in Texas, Canada and Egypt in order to meet part of the clean-up bill.
    BP vice-president Kent Wells said crews hoped to drill sideways into the blown-out well and intercept it at the end of July.
    The relief well being drilled towards the damaged Macondo well is necessary to plug it permanently. A second well is being drilled as a back-up measure.
    BP vice-president Kent Wells said the relief well was on schedule for completion.
    “The relief well is exactly where we want it, pointed in the right direction,” he said.
    “The intercept of the Macondo well is still for the end of July.”
    At one point, Adm Allen had wanted to relieve pressure in the ruptured well by opening up BP's cap on the blowout preventer (BOP) and piping oil up to ships on the surface, but he relented.
    Opening the cap would have required allowing millions of gallons oil to gush into the sea again for a few days while the pipe was attached.
    Mr Wells added that experts were also considering a “static kill” whereby drilling mud would be injected downwards into the BOP, as well as sideways through the relief well, in order to seal Macondo.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    David Cameron faces a history of complexity on US trip

    by , under NEWS
    David Cameron faces a history of complexity on US trip

    In modern politics perception is everything and armies of diplomats and press officers are engaged to make sure that we perceive what we are meant to perceive.
    When former Prime Minister Gordon Brown last came to Washington the trip was held to be a disaster.
    He was portrayed as a kind of foreign-policy Norman Wisdom, reeling and stumbling from one humiliation to another.
    There was no state dinner. He presented President Barack Obama with a fabulous gift carved from the wood of an old slaving ship and received in return just a couple of DVDs. And finally their brief joint press conference was conducted sitting in easy chairs, rather than standing at lecterns.

  • It was a catastrophe; Gordon Brown had been snubbed and the special relationship just was not special any more.
    David Cameron's first trip to Washington as prime minister has been calibrated with agonising care to ensure that even the thinnest-skinned socialite or hardest-hearted tabloid headline writer could no possibly interpret it as humiliating.
    There were podiums; there was the obligatory over-run of talks to imply a closeness bordering on hunger for each other's company and there was the unique access – how many other foreign leaders have been shown the carefully-tidied bedrooms of the Obama daughters? There was heavy-handed banter about whether you drink your beer warm or cold.
    And there were the words – which were decidedly warm.
    Britain tends to work itself into a frenzy over just how special the “special relationship” remains in the modern world and America does not.
    But Mr Obama made a heroic effort to put the issue to bed, talking of how the two men had made a brilliant start as partners, how the two countries had the closest intelligence co-operation of any partners on earth and declaring simply that the US has “no closer ally and no stronger partner”.
    This is not, you suspect, about the White House preferring Mr Cameron to Mr Brown – it is possible that Team Obama studied how Mr Brown's trip was reported and realised that its attempts to cut some of the flummery out of these visits had backfired.
    Mr Cameron himself had rather a deft go at putting the issue to bed in an article written for the Wall Street Journal on the morning of his meeting at the White House.
    He set out his own links with the United States – and his love of the place and what it has done for the world – in a way which will appeal to many Americans.
    And he warned against the absurdity of applying the techniques of what he called Kremlinology to the relationship between the UK and its oldest and staunchest ally. He even offered this accurate depiction of how proponents of the view that the relationship is in decline have worked.
    “They forensically compute the length of meetings,” he wrote, “whether it's a brush-by or a full bilateral… dissecting the location and grandeur of the final press conference – fretting even over whether you're standing up or sitting down together.”
    However ludicrous it might be, however, it certainly looked as though Team Cameron and Team Obama had worked hard in advance to shut down any possibility of a snub story. Which was perhaps just as well since the inter-linked stories of the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico and American suspicions that BP may somehow have been involved in the decision to free the Lockerbie bomber presented problems of real substance to set alongside the vexed issues of the global economy and the war in Afghanistan.
    Mr Cameron's opposition to the release of Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi while he was still in opposition is politically useful in Washington, where the decision was greeted with deep anger.
    The prime minister spoke of asking the cabinet secretary to look back through old documents to see what else might be released and Mr Obama talked of the need to have all the facts in the case “laid out there”.
    But there was no awkward pressure on Mr Cameron for a full-blown British investigation. Scotland, which actually released al-Megrahi, has already held one.
    There was common ground, too, on the need for BP to plug the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, clean up the waters and pay out appropriate compensation.
    The overall message was that such issues which some people had speculated might damage the special relationship could in fact be dealt with through it, a practical demonstration of its strength. One interesting issue to watch which will also test that relationship is the campaign in Britain against the planned extradition to the US of Gary McKinnon, a computer hacker who faces charges related to breaching security on Pentagon computers.
    Mr McKinnon could face 60 years in jail here and Mr Cameron has made it clear in the past that he thinks Mr McKinnon – whose supporters say he is too vulnerable to cope with imprisonment in the US – could be tried in Britain instead.
    The matter was discussed and, although neither leader committed himself to a deal, it is clear that some sort of negotiation is under way. It will be interesting to see if the special relationship pays off in Mr McKinnon's case.
    So, plenty of substance in this first White House summit for David Cameron, but the biggest question perhaps is whether he succeeded in heading off our tendency for discussing tone and body language over politics and diplomacy.
    I would not bet on it.
    When Harold MacMillan first visited John F Kennedy in 1961 he was treated to lengthy political talks in Washington and a trip to Key West in Florida with the presidential entourage. It was long, intimate and packed with Cold War substance.
    The British reaction? To wonder if the Special Relationship was still “special”…

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    US announces new sanctions against North Korea

    by , under NEWS
    US announces new sanctions against North Korea

    “But until they change direction, the United States stands firmly on behalf of the people and government of the Republic of Korea, where we provide a stalwart defence along with our allies and partners.”
    The warship dispute has led to heightened tensions between North and South Korea in recent months.
    On Tuesday, the nominee to be US director of national intelligence warned that the incident might herald a “dangerous new period”.
    James Clapper told a Senate hearing that Pyongyang might seek “to advance its internal and external political goals through direct attacks”.
    Mr Gates said there were signs Pyongyang was becoming more provocative as it prepared for its ailing leader, Kim Jong-il, to hand over power.
    “I think it is something that we have to look at very closely, we have to keep it in mind and be very vigilant,” he said.
    Mr Gates said the US was taking steps to “further strengthen deterrence and also demonstrate our determination not to be intimidated”.
    But our correspondent says Pyongyang is unlikely to heed the warnings from Washington – it has already dismissed upcoming US-South Korean naval exercises as “dangerous sabre-rattling”.
    The first manoeuvres, in the Sea of Japan (East Sea) for four days from Sunday, will involve the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George Washington and 20 other ships and submarines, as well as 100 aircraft and 8,000 personnel. Later exercises will take place in the Yellow Sea.
    China has objected to any foreign military operations in the Yellow Sea, which is on the western side of the Korean Peninsula.
    On Wednesday, China expressed “deep concern” over the plans.
    “We urge relevant parties to remain calm and exercise restraint and not do anything to exacerbate regional tensions,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang.
    North and South Korea technically remain at war because their three-year conflict ended in an armistice in 1953 and no peace treaty was signed. The US has since stationed thousands of troops in South Korea.

    Source:BBC

    Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Senators call for inquiry into Lockerbie bomber release

    by , under NEWS
    Senators call for inquiry into Lockerbie bomber release

    A group of US senators has repeated calls for an inquiry into the release of the Lockerbie bomber, following a meeting with Prime Minister David Cameron.
    Claims have been made that BP lobbied for the release, but Mr Cameron said it was the Scottish government that was responsible for freeing Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi.
    New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand said justice had not been served.
    Mr Cameron has asked the UK's top civil servant to review government papers, but he has rejected US demands for an inquiry.

  • Megrahi was freed by Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill on compassionate grounds and allowed to go home to Libya.
    He has prostate cancer and, at the time, was said to have as little as three months to live. Megrahi is still alive almost a year later.
    Ms Gillibrand said it was clear a full investigation into the release was still needed.
    “This is about how we fight terrorism. We cannot have a convicted terrorist be told that he had three months to live and released and sitting in the lap of luxury for up to 10 years,” she said.
    “That is not justice served and, when we are trying to be able to be effective in fighting terrorism worldwide as allies, we cannot tolerate a convicted terrorist going free on the basis of evidence that may well have been fraudulent.”
    Senator Chuck Schumer, also from New York, said there was “too much suspicion to brush this aside”.
    “The only way to restore the integrity of what happened and to continue the integrity of the British government is to do a full and complete investigation,” he said.
    Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond has defended the decision to release Megrahi.
    Mr Salmond also offered to publish all correspondence between his ministers and the UK and US governments surrounding the case.
  • But he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the Scottish government had no regrets about releasing Megrahi as it had followed “due process”.
    “You can only take a decision in good faith. If you take a decision in good faith you don't regret it,” he said.
    He added that prisoners released on health grounds sometimes lived longer than expected, such as train robber Ronnie Biggs, who was released from prison last year.
    And he said the Scottish government had not been lobbied by BP, nor had any kind of contact with the oil company.
    It had also been opposed to any prisoner transfer deal with Libya of the type agreed by then prime minister Tony Blair in 2007, as it was a “tainted process and something that should be avoided”.
    Kenny MacAskill rejected Libya's prisoner transfer application for Megrahi and he said he had based his decision “on strict justice criteria”.
    He said: “There is not one instance of an application for compassionate release having met the criteria being rejected by any minister – SNP, Labour, Liberal or Tory.
    “I received the appropriate criteria from the director of health and social care, from the prison governor and indeed from the parole board.”
    David Cameron said he had seen no evidence the Scottish government had been “swayed” by lobbying from BP.
    The firm is already facing widespread criticism in the US for its handling of the enormous oil leak from one of its platforms in the Mexican Gulf.
    BP would have to explain any representations it had made over Megrahi, Mr Cameron said at a White House press conference after a three-hour meeting with US President Barack Obama.
    He and President Obama had been in “violent agreement” that freeing the bomber last August had been an error, he added.
    Mr Cameron, on his first official trip to the US since becoming prime minister, said: “Releasing the Lockerbie bomber, a mass murderer, was completely wrong.
    “He showed his victims no compassion. They were not allowed to die in their beds at home.”
    But he added: “That was not a decision taken by BP, it was a decision taken by the Scottish government.”
    Mr Obama said people in the US had been left “surprised, disappointed and angry”.
    Some 270 people died in the 1988 bombing of a Pan Am flight over Scotland, most of them Americans.
    The bomber was freed by Mr MacAskill and allowed to go home to Libya.
    BP has insisted it had no discussions with either the UK or Scottish governments over the issue. Should there be an inquiry in to the release of the Lockerbie bomber? Send us your comments using the form below: The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide.

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    Jul
    21

    Lesbian receives $35000 payout over cancelled prom

    by , under NEWS
    Lesbian receives $35000 payout over cancelled prom

    Share this page Lesbian receives 35,000 payout over cancelled prom A lesbian student in the US who was banned from bringing her girlfriend to her high school prom is to receive a 35,000 (23,000) payout to settle a discrimination lawsuit.
    The school district in rural Mississippi cancelled the prom rather than let the lesbian couple attend.
    The student, Constance McMillen, 18, became a minor celebrity because of the row, which led to heavy media coverage.
    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed the suit on her behalf.
    As part of the settlement, the Itawamba County school district agreed to implement a policy that would protect students from discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
    The school district also agreed to pay Ms McMillen's legal fees.
    However, officials said in their settlement offer that they did not believe they had violated Ms McMillen's rights and that a non-discrimination policy was already in place.

  • Ms McMillen said that she was hopeful that gay students would be treated fairly in the future, even though she had been harassed so much by students blaming her for the prom's cancellation that she had finished her studies at a different high school.
    “I'm so glad this is all over. I won't ever get my prom back, but it's worth it if it changes things at my school,” Ms McMillen said.
    “Constance went through a great deal of harassment and humiliation simply for standing up for her rights, and she should be proud of what she has accomplished,” said Christine Sun, a senior lawyer with the ACLU.
    “Thanks to her bravery, we now not only have a federal court precedent that can be used to protect the rights of students all over the country to bring the date they want to their proms, but we also have the first school anti-discrimination policy of its kind in Mississippi.”

    Source:BBC

  • Go straight to Post

    Comments Offread more
    © Copyright All Global News on One Page 2011. All rights reserved.