Archive for October 6th, 2010

Oct
06

Will the UK Governments Defense Cuts Make a European Army More Likely

by , under NEWS
Will the UK Governments Defense Cuts Make a European Army More Likely

The UK’s government’s swift Strategic Defence and Security Review is now widely accepted to announce cuts of up to twenty percent to the annual defense budget. As the Parliamentary Defense Committee has been quick to point out, the Review is being done too quickly with too little consultation with the public and the defense industry.
Unfortunately, it seems that such rash cuts are not unique to the UK, but are actually happening all over Europe. Defense spending has been the first casualty of the austerity measures in the face of out of control government debt.
Many European nations acknowledge that the future security environment is uncertain. Even before that, we have treaties to uphold. Our enforcement of global rules relies on a strong military, as does our ability to protect the safe passage of the heat and light we take for granted, the goods we buy at the supermarket, and the food on our plates. And with the center of gravity of global power moving Eastwards, these cuts risk withdrawing us from the strategic picture in Asia for a generation.
There is also the question of the industrial capability which we would lose, as cuts bite. That kind of know how in the Defence Industry is something a country can build up painstakingly over time, and once cut, is hard to get back.
So why in the face of such uncertainly are EU nations so willing to cut their defense budgets?
There are two main reasons for this:
Firstly, most EU nations are happy to let the United States provide the necessary security umbrella to ensure a stable international environment. After all, even during the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo — Europe’s worst ethnic cleansing conflicts since World War II — Europe was wholly impotent and had to rely on the United States to provide the aircraft for the bombing sorties. In fact, 97% of all aircraft on this ‘NATO mission’ were American. The military thinking seems to be that “The US came out to rescue us before, and it will again.”
Secondly, many EU countries have been discussing the possibility of ‘burden sharing’ and exploring the prospect of creating an EU army controlled by Brussels. France, Germany and Poland in particular are keen on this idea and see it as a key building-block for a future European state. President Sarkozy already seems to be laying the groundwork with the creation of the EU Rapid Reaction Corps which consists of 1500 troops from member countries which take turns to be on standby for emergencies.
Angela Merkel, in an interview with the Bild in 2007 went further and said that the creation of an EU Army should be a ‘key goal’ for the next 50 years. She explained, “In the EU itself, we have to come closer to creating a common European army.”
Franco Frattini, the Italian foreign affairs minister, also believes that one of the ways of strengthening a common European identity is by building a European army. In an interview earlier this year with Le Figaro he said, “If Europe wants to be credible in the war against terrorism, in stabilizing crisis zones and in nuclear safety, it must ‘produce’ its own security.”
So where does this leave the UK?
The previous Labour Secretary of Defense John Hutton told the Sunday Times in 2008 that people who dismiss an EU army are ‘pathetic.’
The current UK Secretary of Defense Liam Fox has unequivocally denied rumors that the UK and France may share aircraft carriers as the coalition government considers scrapping its own two planned carriers.
However, in the face of cuts of 20% to the defense budget, Britain’s pretensions to a world power status with global strike capabilities will surely be at an end. As will our usefulness to our most important ally the United States. In fact, the Pentagon has explicitly warned the MOD that such cuts would threaten the special relationship. How then will the UK be able to influence the grand chessboard?
But most worryingly of all, with such a depleted military, five, ten or fifteen years down the line, how are we going to resist demands to pool our military with those of other countries’? We have built up a military which is respected all around the world. I fear that these cuts are the beginning of a process of running it down and subsuming it into the Europeanisation of our hard-won military prowess.
Azeem Ibrahim is a Vice President of the United Kingdom National Defence Association, Director and Policy Board Member of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and a former International Security Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Jason Mraz Is Turning the Tide An Interview

by , under NEWS
Jason Mraz Is Turning the Tide An Interview

Written by Magda Rod and Anna Griffin
Images by Jen Rosenstein/PRETTYBIRD
As the world watched the destruction of The Gulf of Mexico caused by the BP oil spill, some passionate activists stepped up to lend their voice to the potential solutions to the crisis. One such hero was Jason Mraz. I was honored to join Jason and the FUEL team in New Orleans in June, as we gathered with heads of environmental NGOs and others to brainstorm and give a voice to the solutions.
FUEL director Josh Tickell stated:
Coco Eco Mag: Congratulations on your two Grammy’s. I noticed your Dad celebrating with you that night, and he said that of course he was proud of you, but already was and would be with or without the Grammy’s. It sounds like you have a pretty solid foundation you’re building on.
Jason Mraz: Indeed. My parents were always very supportive and accepting. They even shared my curiosity for life, or perhaps I theirs.
CEM: Rumor has it that you’re a “walk the talk” kind of guy. What sort of sustainable practices do you live in your every day life? Are you off the grid, etc? I hear avocados are involved in some way. What’s the story?
JM: I’m not off the grid yet, but that is the goal. At the moment we only have a solar system to offset the electricity our house and studio use. We’re currently exploring energy storage and where to dig our well as we’re gearing up to source as much of our own water as possible. With such little rainfall and rising water prices in San Diego, catching rain and storing it is the way to go. This year we’re also launching a three-year transformation from our mono-culture of non-organic avocados, to a more diversified property of organic foods. The goal is to generate 365 days of food with a surplus for our friends and neighbors.
CEM: That’s inspiring! I’m glad you brought up water. I was so pleased to see you in New Orleans, participating in the FUEL events to draw attention to the crisis in The Gulf. What prompted you to support this?
JM: I was dumbfounded by the lack of clean-up and the way BP was going about cleaning up the spill using toxic dispersants. Why hasn’t this been declared a national emergency? I was curious as to why a million Americans weren’t lining the beaches in boats and with buckets to preserve the life sustaining resource that is the Gulf of Mexico. Personally, as a surfer, I was most sorry for my fellow watermen. Seeing beaches closed due to contamination just broke my heart. If that ever happened in San Diego I’m afraid I might be forced to move.
So I took action. I raised my hand to volunteer my time and to see what the heck was the hold up in stopping the spill and what was slowing the clean-up. What I discovered was a cluster f*** between BP, local authorities, fisherman, coast guard, and government policy. No one wants to be liable in case more goes wrong. Add this to the growing size of the spill and you get the sense that its almost impossible for anyone to contribute. Beaches are off limits and locals are for the continuation of drilling. The conversation down south seems to be getting mixed reviews. Learning this, I want to see a win/win for all. I believe all people are good at heart, it’s just that our limited knowledge and resources, or lack of transparency I should say, make it hard to navigate through this much needed shift.
My involvement will be a push for a faster clean-up solution and a future in clean energy, to bring awareness about the technologies than can reduce our dependency on Oil. With greener cars and appliances, greener ways to heat and cool our homes, companies like BP won’t have to work so hard to meet our demand for Oil. With less of an appetite for oil, perhaps we can save the arctic from disaster and even go as far as leaving Iraq alone or spend our time helping them rebuild their country instead.
CEM: What was the result of your effort with the think tank and other connections you worked with there?
JM: We created an Oil Clean Up Alliance, where any one person and all organizations can share resources and info to take immediate action. My personal result is the commitment to communicate through all my channels a push of the green movement even harder and take full responsibility for this spill.
CEM: Did you get a chance to personally see any of the damage while you were there?
JM: I did. I visited Grande Isle Louisiana where the oil is showing up on the beach. It’s ground zero of the disaster and where depending on the day, 30-60% of US oil is piped from. On the closed beaches, oil is being bulldozed and packed down into the sand — even behind the booms laid out to stop oil from coming up on land. It’s not easy to see at first. I made-up on my head that the clean up is more like a cover up. The same applies for the surface oil. The products BP are using are only sinking the oil. Little do they seem to care about the horrible effects this will continue to have on the natural world as the currents underwater will carry these huge clouds of oil to every corner of the globe while the toxic dispersants themselves pollute the water and kill the wild and marine life. Few were on the wasteland of the beach but us, a group of seven environmentalists and then a sad image of a mom and two young daughters playing in the sand. This was their vacation beach and they weren’t allowed to go near the water. We were all being watched by three men on a distant deck with binoculars. Maybe they were locals or curious like us, I’ll never know. Either way, it was a creepy scene.
The other damage we saw were all the closed restaurants and road signage by the community such as, “if we’re not allowed to fish or swim, how are we supposed to feed our children?”
CEM: That’s heartbreaking. What’s the hardest part about this disaster for you personally?
JM: The most difficult part of this story is meeting the families who are being devastated by this disaster. Even if there was food to catch, fisherman don’t want to run their boats through the oil. It isn’t pretty out there. And for those who support the Oil business, it’s that which they support that has reeked havoc on their natural environment and caused a great deal of death and disease in their community. They feel if the oil companies pack up and leave, which they could, then hundreds of thousands would be out of work, collapsing their entire economy. This is a worthy fear when that’s all that’s available in the area. A push for new technologies and new energy sources to operate in that region could keep them all in business as well as a lot safer.
CEM: Right. If we could replace the drilling with clean energy production, it would be a win/win for all involved. So what do you think people can do to help “turn the tide” so to speak?
JM: Step 1. Call your Senators. Be in their face as much as the oil companies are. Insist they vote for green and clean energy; otherwise, tell them you will vote for someone else.
Step 2. Take your own personal steps to reduce energy consumption and unnecessary waste, especially with fuel and single-use plastics! Each American has to have their own eureka moment for this green shift to happen and sustain itself. Its now or never and we need everyone awake on this issue. The next 1000 years will be determined by how hard we work right now!
CEM: Has the disaster influenced your creative process in any way? Writing any songs about the issue?
JM: Everything in life influences my music. I’ve always used songwriting as a means to share what I think is profound. Music is a weapon in the war against unhappiness.
CEM: I hear you are launching a PSA campaign about environmental awareness Can you tell me more about that? And it involves children, right?
JM: We plan to launch a viral awareness campaign. This is an important election year in that we need to elect only those who are environmentally conscious, otherwise, the world as we know it will look like and smell like the closed and contaminated beaches of the Gulf. We’ve tried the old paradigm and in my opinion, the war and the oil spill have gone on for too long. We made change possible when we elected Obama and so we must do it again and create a government that supports the beautiful green future. And yes, we want children involved in this asking powerful questions of our leaders as it is the children’s world we’re presently mucking up.
CEM: What a great idea. What’s coming up next for you in the music arena? A record? Tour?
JM: All of the above. Much music has been recorded this year and we plan to circumnavigate the globe in ’11 and ’12 to shine a little light to all moths seeking a flame.
CEM: How do you green your touring process and do you find it challenging to maintain your lifestyle when you’re on the road?
JM: We seek out locations where BioDeisel is available, only choose green hotels, and we do not allow plastic water bottles. We eat locally and travel light, hoping to stimulate each local economy fairly and leave no trace of our being there other than seeing smiles on peoples faces.
CEM: Does your eco-activism influence your fans? What are some of the ways they are impacted?
JM: My partner and I received a Twitter message from a fan that says it all. They posted, “SO inspired by @tprettyman and @jason_mraz. I ask forgiveness for my addiction to oil. I am committed to changing the way I live.
CEM: Right on. Inspiring and educating people, and leading by example are powerful tools for transformation. Any ideas for how the music industry could green up its act?
JM: Musicians are so well covered in the press, it would be great to see more outspoken practitioners of green life.
Also, the touring world could stand a make-over. We use so much fuel and electricity to put on concerts that it would be a lot sexier to travel with solar generators and truck and bus convoys that run on Algae fuel.
CEM: Amen to that! So speaking of sexy, what clothes do you like wearing? Are there any particular brands you love?
JM: I’m not a brand whore. I’ve always been a jeans and t-shirt kind of guy. These days I prefer organic fibers because they feel better on my skin. Recently I co-founded BlendApparel.com, a green t-shirt company with transformative messages, that we hope keep our conversation going about our ever changing environment — Tees intended to inspire and empower the people, etc.
CEM: And organic feels not only good on the skin, but on the planet too. If everyone shifted to organic vs. conventional cotton, we could dramatically reduce the amount of poison being pumped into our planet. And those bamboo T’s are super yummy. According to the Blend Apparel website, are made by “transformationaries.” Loving that term!
Thanks so much for your time Jason, and all you are doing to raise awareness and doing your part to help “Turn the Tide.”
It’s somewhat of a consolation to me to know that there are people like Jason out there actively working on getting the word out about the magnitude of the problems we face, and better yet, the potential solutions to them. There are others in the public eye who are speaking out as well. Philippe Cousteau pointed out recently that our government spends infinitely more on space exploration than on studying and protecting our world’s oceans.
James Cameron, a man who has spent over 3,000 hours in our oceans and recognizes their magnificence and how essential their health is to our entire ecosystem, has confirmed that the sequel to Avatar will be focused on the oceans of Pandora. Hopefully that will lead to more discussion about this vital issue. But then again, that film could take five years to make, and the time for action is now.
It’s time for us all to stand up and speak up. What are you going to do to be part of the solution?**

Follow Anna Griffin on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/Twitter.com/Coc

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Credit Card Benefits Youve Probably Never Used

by , under NEWS
Credit Card Benefits Youve Probably Never Used

Credit card selection tends to be all about the numbers. We all know how to calculate and compare rewards, interest rates, and fees, so these tend to be the main deciding factors when deciding what to carry in our wallets. However, credit card companies offer all kinds of other benefits that most of us know very little about and can’t really quantify for our decision-making.
Two such benefits include purchase protection and return protection, both of which give consumers some degree of protection from their purchases, above and beyond what merchants offer. Like insurance, you never know how important this can be until you need it.
Return Protection
This protection kicks in when a merchant otherwise won’t let you return something that you bought. For example, if Macy’s has a 30-day return policy and you realize on day 31 that your new cashmere sweater doesn’t quite fit you right, your credit card company may be able to help you out.
Purchase Protection
Purchase protection can be even more valuable, since this is what covers your new toy in the event that it breaks or is stolen. Depending on what sort of retailers you’re buying from, damage may or may not be covered by their return policy, and theft is certainly not covered. But if you made the purchase with your credit card, your issuer could be more helpful.
What does your credit card cover?
Be sure to check your card’s terms to see what exactly is covered, but as a general rule this is what we’ve found:
American Express cards offer both types of protection.
90 days return protection of up to $300 per incident, and limited to $1,000 annually. There are plenty of restrictions listed, but it definitely covers clothes.
90 days purchase protection against accidental damage or theft, up to $1,000 per incident and $50,000 annually. It covers purchases worldwide and will either replace, repair, or reimburse them as long as you provide proof of theft, accidental damage, or vandalism.
Visa offers purchase protection on all Signature cards, but return protection depends on the issuer.
90 days return protection is offered on some cards, depending on whether you are enrolled in the program. Items can be returned for any reason and you’ll be covered for $250 per item and up to $1,000 annually, as long as the Benefit Administrator receives it in “like-new/good working condition.”
90 days purchase protection is offered to Visa Signature customers and covers $500 per claim and up to $50,000 per cardholder. Items will be replaced, repaired, or reimbursed “at the Benefit Administrator’s Discretion… in the event of theft, damage due to fire, vandalism, accidentally discharged water, or certain weather conditions.”
MasterCard appears to offer both types of coverage on most cards, but when we searched the agreements of specific cards, we rarely found any mention of return protection. So make sure you verify with your cardholder’s agreement.
60 days of return protection of up to $250 per item. No annual limit is disclosed, but then again MasterCard also had the least clear disclosures.
90 days of purchase protection are offered, and the rules aren’t as detailed as with Amex or Visa, but you can assume the rules are similar.
Who’s missing from this list?
In our research, Discover was noticeably absent. They do not seem to offer either type of protection on any of their cards, which seems like a drastic oversight. While this won’t be a deal breaker for most card users, it’s definitely worth bearing in mind if you’re comparing cash back credit cards, and trying to decide between the Amex or the Discover (hint: go with the Amex. We like the Blue Cash).
Readers: Have any of you used these types of programs in the past? Do they work as advertised? Or have you had any exceptionally positive or negative experiences with certain credit card types?

Follow Tim Chen on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/nerdwallet

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Letter from a Forgotten Jew

by , under NEWS
Letter from a Forgotten Jew

I am a forgotten Jew.
My roots are nearly 2,600 years old, my ancestors made landmark contributions to world civilization, and my presence was felt from North Africa to the Fertile Crescent–but I barely exist today. You see, I am a Jew from the Arab world. No, that’s not entirely accurate. I’ve fallen into a semantic trap. I predated the Arab conquest in just about every country in which I lived. When Arab invaders conquered North Africa, for example, I had already been present there for over six centuries.
Today, you cannot find a trace of me in most of this vast region.
Try seeking me out in Iraq.
Remember the Babylonian exile from ancient Judea, following the destruction of the First Temple in 586 BCE? Remember the vibrant Jewish community that emerged there and produced the Babylonian Talmud?
Do you know that in the ninth century, under Muslim rule, we Jews in Iraq were forced to wear a distinctive yellow patch on our clothing–a precursor of the infamous Nazi yellow badge–and faced other discriminatory measures? Or that in the eleventh and fourteenth centuries, we faced onerous taxes, the destruction of several synagogues, and severe repression?
And I wonder if you have ever heard of the Farhud, the breakdown of law and order, in Baghdad in June 1941. As an AJC specialist, George Gruen, reported:
In a spasm of uncontrolled violence, between 170 and 180 Jews were killed, more than 900 were wounded, and 14,500 Jews sustained material losses through the looting or destruction of their stores and homes. Although the government eventually restored order … Jews were squeezed out of government employment, limited in schools, and subjected to imprisonment, heavy fines, or sequestration of their property on the flimsiest of charges of being connected to either or both of the two banned movements. Indeed, Communism and Zionism were frequently equated in the statutes. In Iraq the mere receipt of a letter from a Jew in Palestine [pre-1948] was sufficient to bring about arrest and loss of property.
At our peak, we were 135,000 Jews in 1948, and we were a vitally important factor in virtually every aspect of Iraqi society. To illustrate our role, here is what the Encyclopedia Judaica wrote about Iraqi Jewry: “During the 20th century, Jewish intellectuals, authors, and poets made an important contribution to the Arabic language and literature by writing books and numerous essays.”
By 1950 other Iraqi Jews and I were faced with the revocation of citizenship, seizure of assets, and, most ominously, public hangings. A year earlier, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Sa’id had told the British ambassador in Amman of a plan to expel the entire Jewish community and place us at Jordan’s doorstep. The ambassador later recounted the episode in a memoir entitled From the Wings: Amman Memoirs, 1947-1951.
Miraculously, in 1951 about 100,000 of us got out, thanks to the extraordinary help of Israel, but with little more than the clothes on our backs. The Israelis dubbed the rescue Operation Ezra and Nehemiah.
Those of us who stayed lived in perpetual fear–fear of violence and more public hangings, as occurred on January 27, 1969, when nine Jews were hanged in the center of Baghdad on trumped-up charges, while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis wildly cheered the executions. The rest of us got out one way or another, including friends of mine who found safety in Iran when it was ruled by the Shah.
Now there are no Jews left to speak of, nor are there monuments, museums, or other reminders of our presence on Iraqi soil for twenty-six centuries.
Do the textbooks used in Iraqi schools today refer to our one-time presence, to our positive contribution to the evolution of Iraqi society and culture? Not a chance. Two-thousand-six-hundred years are erased, wiped out, as if they never happened. Can you put yourself in my shoes and feel the excruciating pain of loss and invisibility?
I am a forgotten Jew.
I was first settled in what is present-day Libya by the Egyptian ruler Ptolemy Lagos (323-282 BCE), according to the first-century Jewish historian Josephus. My forefathers and foremothers lived continuously on this soil for over two millennia, our numbers bolstered by Berbers who converted to Judaism, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fleeing the Inquisition, and Italian Jews crossing the Mediterranean.
I was confronted with the anti-Jewish legislation of the occupying Italian Fascists. I endured the incarceration of 2,600 fellow Jews in an Axis-run camp in 1942. I survived the deportation of 200 fellow Jews to Italy the same year. I coped with forced labor in Libya during the war. I witnessed Muslim rioting in 1945 and 1948 that left nearly 150 Libyan Jews dead, hundreds injured, and thousands homeless.
I watched with uncertainty as Libya became an independent country in 1951. I wondered what would happen to those 6,000 of us still there, the remnant of the 39,000 Jews who had formed this once-proud community–that is, until the rioting sent people packing, many headed for the newly established State of Israel.
The good news was that there were constitutional protections for minority groups in the newly established Libyan nation. The bad news was that they were completely ignored.
Within ten years of my native country’s independence, I could not vote, hold public office, serve in the army, obtain a passport, purchase new property, acquire majority ownership in any new business, or participate in the supervision of our community’s affairs.
By June 1967 the die was cast. Those of us who had remained, hoping against hope that things would improve in a land to which we were deeply attached and which, at times, had been good to us, had no choice but to flee. The Six-Day War created an explosive atmosphere in the streets. Eighteen Jews were killed, and Jewish-owned homes and shops were burned to the ground.
I and 4,000 other Jews left however we could, most of us with no more than a suitcase and the equivalent of a few dollars.
I was never allowed to return. I never recovered the assets I had left behind in Libya, despite promises by the government. In effect, it was all stolen–the homes, furniture, shops, communal institutions, you name it. Still worse, I was never able to visit the grave sites of my relatives. That hurt especially deeply. In fact, I was told that, under Colonel Qaddhafi, who seized power in 1969, the Jewish cemeteries were bulldozed and the headstones used for road building.
I am a forgotten Jew.
My experience–the good and the bad–lives on in my memory, and I’ll do my best to transmit it to my children and grandchildren, but how much can they absorb? How much can they identify with a culture that seems like a relic of a distant past that appears increasingly remote and intangible? True, a few books and articles on my history have been written, but–and here I’m being generous–they are far from best-sellers.
In any case, can these books compete with the systematic attempt by Libyan leaders to expunge any trace of my presence over two millennia? Can these books compete with a world that paid virtually no attention to the end of my existence?
Take a look at The New York Times index for 1967, and you’ll see for yourself how the newspaper of record covered the tragic demise of an ancient community. I can save you the trouble of looking–just a few paltry lines were all the story got.
I am a forgotten Jew.
I am one of hundreds of thousands of Jews who once lived in countries like Iraq and Libya. All told, we numbered close to 900,000 in 1948. Today we are fewer than 5,000, mostly concentrated in two moderate countries–Morocco and Tunisia.
We were once vibrant communities in Aden, Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and other nations, with roots dating back literally 2,000 years and more. Now we are next to none.
Why does no one speak of us and our story? Why does the world relentlessly, obsessively speak of the Palestinian refugees from the 1948 and 1967 wars in the Middle East–who, not unimportantly, were displaced by wars launched by their own Arab brethren–but totally ignore the Jewish refugees from the 1948 and 1967 wars?
Why is the world left with the impression that there’s only one refugee population from the Arab-Israeli conflict, or, more precisely, the Arab conflict with Israel, when, in fact, there are two refugee populations, and our numbers were somewhat larger than the Palestinians?
I’ve spent many sleepless nights trying to understand this injustice.
Should I blame myself?
Perhaps we Jews from Arab countries accepted our fate too passively. Perhaps we failed to seize the opportunity to tell our story. Look at the Jews of Europe. They turned to articles, books, poems, plays, paintings, and film to recount their story. They depicted the periods of joy and the periods of tragedy, and they did it in a way that captured the imagination of many non-Jews. Perhaps I was too fatalistic, too shell-shocked, too uncertain of my artistic or literary talents.
But that can’t be the only reason for my unsought status as a forgotten Jew. It’s not that I haven’t tried to make at least some noise; I have. I’ve organized gatherings and petitions, arranged exhibitions, appealed to the United Nations, and met with officials from just about every Western government. But somehow it all seems to add up to less than the sum of its parts. No, that’s still being too kind. The truth is, it has pretty much fallen on deaf ears.
You know that acronym–MEGO? It means “My eyes glazed over.” That’s the impression I often have when I’ve tried raising the subject of the Jews from Arab lands with diplomats, elected officials, and journalists–their eyes glaze over (TEGO).
No, I shouldn’t be blaming myself, though I could always be doing more for the sake of history and justice.
There’s actually a far more important explanatory factor.
We Jews from the Arab world picked up the pieces of our shattered lives after our hurried departures–in the wake of intimidation, violence, and discrimination–and moved on.
Most of us went to Israel, where we were welcomed. The years following our arrival weren’t always easy–we started at the bottom and had to work our way up. We came with varying levels of education and little in the way of tangible assets. But we had something more to sustain us through the difficult process of adjustment and acculturation: our immeasurable pride as Jews, our deeply rooted faith, our cherished rabbis and customs, and our commitment to Israel’s survival and well-being.
Some of us–somewhere between one-fourth and one-third of the total–chose to go elsewhere.
Jews from the French-speaking Arab countries gravitated toward France and Quebec. Jews from Libya created communities in Rome and Milan. Egyptian and Lebanese Jews were sprinkled throughout Europe and North America, and a few resettled in Brazil. Syrian Jews immigrated to the United States, especially New York, as well as to Mexico City and Panama City. And on it went.
Wherever we settled, we put our shoulder to the wheel and created new lives. We learned the local language if we didn’t already know it, found jobs, sent our children to school, and, as soon as we could, built our own congregations to preserve the rites and rituals that were distinctive to our tradition.
I would never underestimate the difficulties or overlook those who, for reasons of age or ill health or poverty, couldn’t make it, but, by and large, in a short time we have taken giant steps, whether in Israel or elsewhere.
I may be a forgotten Jew, but my voice will not remain silent. It cannot, for if it does, it becomes an accomplice to historical denial and revisionism.
I will speak out because I will not allow the Arab conflict with Israel to be defined unfairly through the prism of one refugee population only, the Palestinian.
I will speak out because what happened to me is now being done, with eerie familiarity, to another minority group in the region, the Christians, and once again I see the world averting its eyes, as if denial ever solved anything.
I will speak out because I refuse to be a forgotten Jew.
*Adapted and updated from an essay originally written in 2003.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Ben Bernanke Wants Your Social Security Money

by , under NEWS
Ben Bernanke Wants Your Social Security Money

Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke took another swing at Social Security and Medicare today, saying yet again that they’ll need to be cut to protect our nation’s financial health. Based on his record, any roadmap Bernanke lays out for the future is worth following … as long as you hold it up to a mirror first so that it’s reversed.
For those of you who prefer equations to words, let me put it this way: BB on SS = BS.
Bernanke’s comments about Social Security yesterday weren’t just wrong. They were spectacularly wrong. They were as wrong as his comments on housing in 2005, when he denied there was a housing bubble and said that a rapid decline in housing prices was “a pretty unlikely possibility.”
They were as wrong as his comments in 2007, when he said “there’s a reasonable possibility that we’ll see some strengthening in the economy sometime during the middle of the new year” and added that “there’s not much indication at this point that subprime mortgage issues have spread into the broader mortgage market, which still seems to be healthy.”
They were as wrong as his comments in April of this year, when he said that “my best guess is that economic growth, supported by the Federal Reserve’s stimulative monetary policy, will be sufficient to slowly reduce the unemployment rate over the coming year” (a year that’s now half over). He added: “If economic conditions improve, as I expect, we should see increased optimism among consumers and greater willingness on the part of banks to lend, which in turn should aid the recovery.”
Let’s hear a big shout from all those small business owners who are having an easier time getting bank loans. And if there any consumers in the house feeling more optimistic, wave your hands in the air like you just don’t care.
Didn’t think so …
You’d think a record like that would inject even the most self-confident prognosticator with a little humility. Yet an unfazed Bernanke insists on issuing pronouncements about matters that are well outside his purview as Fed chair.
Bernanke’s been on an anti-Social Security tear for some time. He took a run at it, and Medicare, in Congressional testimony last December. The seemingly mild-mannered economist even went so far as to remind Congress that it had the freedom to abolish Medicare and Social Security if it so wished: “”(Social Security is) only mandatory until Congress says it’s not mandatory,” he helpfully observed.
Why go after Social Security? Bernanke quoted bank robber Willie Sutton last December for his answer: “”That’s where the money is.”
Now Bernanke’s no Willie Sutton. He’s a decent enough guy, by all reports. They even say he drives a Ford Focus, for crying out loud. That’s hardly a bankrobber’s getaway car. So why is he gunning for Social Security? Ideology, for one thing, along with a massive dose of Washington tribalthink. Yesterday in Providence he once again sounded his klaxon, an alarm that remained deafeningly silent in the runup to the economic collapse, on the issue of entitlements. His stated concern was for future economic problems caused by government debt — although he could neither describe how a crisis might be triggered or draw “a clear bright line” beyond which real troubles might begin.
Never mind. We need to cut entitlements anyway, says Bernanke, and the public will have to “accept some sacrifices.” (Man, am I getting tired of comfortably well-off people asking others for “sacrifice.” To paraphrase the old religious saying: I met a man who thought he was austere because he drove a Ford Focus, until I met a man with no feet …)
Said Bernanke: “Expectations of large and increasing deficits in the future could inhibit current household and business spending — for example, by reducing confidence in the longer-term prospects for the economy or by increasing uncertainty about future tax burdens and government spending — and thus restrain the recovery.’
You know what’s inhibiting spending and restraining the recovery (besides the fact that folks don’t have jobs, and the Fed’s ignoring its mandate to maintain employment levels)? People keep hearing that their Social Security and Medicare benefits are going to be cut! It’s hard to go out and stimulate the economy with part of your paycheck (if you’re lucky enough to have one) when times are hard and all you hear is that they’ll be taking another piece of your retirement security away.
Having sunk the economic ship, Bernanke and his fellow-thinkers now want to set it afloat again … by puncturing the liferafts.
One part of Bernanke’s assessment isn’t completely off-base, at least at first. He cites two long-term trends, an aging population and health care costs, as major contributors to the deficit. There’s no question that health care costs are eating the economy alive, and the added government cost of Medicare as more people age will place more and more of that cost burden in the government’s hands. So did Bernanke propose a single-payer health care system with the power to reduce the overall cost burden? Or did he explore other ways to restructure the health economy so that it more closely resembles lower-cost European systems?
No. Aside from mass euthanasia for Baby Boomers — an inhumane approach, no matter how sick you are of hearing “Hotel California” — that leaves either massive tax increases or gutting Medicare as the only other options. Guess which way Bernanke’s leaning? While he’s been uncharacteristically Sphinxlike on the specifics, he thought extending tax cuts would be a good way to maintain a “stimulus.” He didn’t exclude tax cuts for the wealthy from that statement, a telling omission that flies in the face of most analyses.
So tax increases, while they receive lip service, aren’t really called for in the Bernanke approach.
While he had no solutions for health care costs, at least his assessment of the problem was fair. But Bernanke’s assessment of Social Security was completely off the mark. When it comes to retirement benefits, he doesn’t have a clue “where the money is.” Yesterday, for example, he raised the alarm about the ratio of younger adults to retirees: “This year, there are about five individuals between the ages of 20 and 64 for each person aged 65 and older. By 2030, when most of the baby boomers will have retired, this ratio is projected to decline to around 3, and it may subsequently fall yet further as life expectancies continue to increase.”
That’s wrong. Really, really wrong. There’s a lot that could be said about the life expectancy issue and worker/retiree ratios, but for now let’s consider this: This wave of coming retirees was equally large when it was contributing to Social Security. That’s one of the reasons why the expected shortfall doesn’t occur until 2037, and why the program would still be able to contribute 75% of benefits after that (and 100% with a minor fix like lifting the payroll cap).
We’ll say it again: Social Security isn’t broken. Say it often enough and you might even stimulate a little more consumer spending.
Bernanke’s honest, whatever his other flaws. He added: “Overall, the projected fiscal pressures associated with Social Security are considerably smaller than the pressures associated with federal health programs, but they still present a significant challenge to policymakers.”
True. Then why fixate on Social Security? First, because the Washington elite finds it easy to stomach the kind of “sacrifice” that benefit cuts would require … of others, especially those who aren’t big campaign donors. Second, because there’s no political will to raise taxes. Third, because nobody wants to address the real issue: health care costs.
Lastly, and most importantly, because there’s a politician/economist orthodoxy on this topic that’s truly strange to observe up close. There’s a shared a set of folkways and beliefs around the subject of Social Security that DC outsiders can’t understand or penetrate. And there’s a ritualized aspect to this austerity talk, one that’s worthy of ethnological study. It’s as if the sacrifice of the elders was an initiation rite for Washington policymakers.
The Beltway Bubble: You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave …
Some headlines today emphasized the fact that Bernanke wants to make these cuts slowly, rather than immediately. Bernanke said the following: “The sooner a plan is established, the longer affected individuals will have to prepare for the necessary changes. Indeed, in the past, long lead times have helped make necessary adjustments less painful and thus politically feasible.”
We are not without sympathy, Mr. Bond. We will give you time to put your affairs in order …
Bernanke’s comments crystallize a strain of thinking that unfortunately dominates Beltway thinking right now: We can’t make drastic cuts immediately but we can schedule future cuts now to demonstrate our “seriousness.” This line of thinking says that cuts must be focused on the only area that can be addressed politically: partially repealing the New Deal by reducing Social Security benefits. Presumably it’s hoped that this will create the political will, not for tax increases, but for subsequently cutting Medicare and other New Deal programs.
That sort of thinking begins by assuming that current political realities, established by the Right and compliant Democrats, are fixed and unchanging. But the political equation may be shifting: So far, more than 112 members of the House of Representatives have signed a pledge to block any cuts to Social Security.
Does the deficit need to be addressed? Yes — at the right time, after the economy has returned to health. Is the groupthink Bernanke represents the right way to do it? Absolutely not. Health care costs need to be cut. And if you really want to know “where the money is,” it’s in the pockets of hedge fund managers and other ultra-rich Americans who, according to Beltway lore, will forever remain immune from significant tax hikes. And it’s in the pockets of bankers who are enriching themselves by playing games with low-interest money from the Fed — Ben Bernanke’s Fed — rather than lending it to get the economy moving again.
Sure, Social Security is where some money is. But that’s money that working Americans paid into a trust fund through their payroll taxes, in the expectation that it would be there when they retire. Raiding it would be the act of a bank robber, not a policymaker.
_______________________________________________________________
Richard (RJ) Eskow, a consultant and writer (and former insurance/finance executive), is a Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America’s Future. This post was produced as part of the Strengthen Social Security campaign. Richard also blogs at A Night Light.
He can be reached at “rjeskow@ourfuture.org.”
Website: Eskow and Associates

Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/rjeskow

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

The US Tea Party and General Strikes in Europe The Outrage of the Middle Class

by , under NEWS
The US Tea Party and General Strikes in Europe  The Outrage of the Middle Class

In May, I wrote an article about the Tea Party Movement. In it I predicted that the financial outcry we were hearing from the Tea Party in our country, as well as the collapse of the Greek banking system at the time, may be preludes to further turmoil in Europe.
That turmoil is exactly what we’re seeing now.
First, Germany had to dish out about 80 billion Euros to rescue the financial system of Greece. Now the weakening financial systems and austerity cuts of Spain, Portugal, France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Poland and Belgium have given rise to widespread financial protests. The working people in these countries are furious about how their own governments are managing their lives and work. Meanwhile, across the water in the United States, the Tea Partiers continue to vocally protest against the American governance.
What is everyone so angry about?
For one, people in Europe and the United States are noticing that the gap between the rich and poor is widening and people in the middle class are working more and living more poorly. The U.S. Tea Partiers and the working people of Europe are not directly angry about the rich getting richer. They hope that some day they may also get rich. They are blaming the government that they elected to help them for helping the bankers and financiers instead of them. In the United States, money multiplies in the hands of the rich, while hard-working middle class people see the value of their work diminish with time, rather than grow. Workers in the United States get the short end of the stick as inflation and printing money makes their labor and assets worth less and less. Meanwhile bankers and financiers see their piles of money grow exponentially. Currently the top 1 percent of households in America make 25 percent of the income. That figure has increased from the 1970s when the top 1 percent made a tenth of the income.
Now this anti-government fire, as predicted, is spreading to Europe (Spain, Portugal, France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Poland and Belgium). As these governments are defending the bankers and financiers by cutting the services and support to the working people in austerity programs, they are also cutting deficits and bailing out the banks. People are essentially saying “throw the rascals out.” In the United States, Republicans ride this anger to get power and get their 2 percent of rich banker CEOs and financiers to get even more tax breaks and get richer. They cloak this in the attractive garb of “financial responsibility.” Their answer is for a platonic oligarchy of a rich class which in magnanimous good will is supposed to provide “jobs” for the middle class. They would make the middle class work hard to support their yachts and castles but let the “free market,” without the protection of union and the government, take care of the workers and their struggle. The free market is a free ride for the few.
What happens when banks charge exorbitant interest rates and are left to their own devices? In 1836 the American lawyer John Whipple pointed out the dangers of unbridled interest on money. He said, “If 5 English pennies… had been… at 5 per cent compound interest from the beginning of the Christian era until the present time, it would amount in gold of standard fineness to 32,366,648,157 spheres of gold each eight thousand miles in diameter, or as large as the earth.” No labor necessary.
Financiers may say that they are lubricating the wheels of the economy, but in reality they are collecting money and doing almost nothing. Every time the U.S. government pays down its debt, it sells bonds to one of the privately owned federal reserve banks. These banks are the sole institutions in our country with the power to print money. They loan to the government and charge interest on the loans. Oftentimes our government takes out these loans just to pay the interest they owe to other banks. It’s a viscous cycle. Obviously people have gotten tired of this. In the United States, the Tea Party is the manifestation of their anger.
We have gone from one worker per family to two, just to keep a working-class family afloat. Even then, we often are unable to make ends meet because of the virtually unlimited power and greed of the financial sector.
In the Untied States this greed has damaged not just the economy, but the political power of the American people. Democracy has been bastardized and corrupted by the fact that elections are financed with huge sums of money. Instead of our elected officials representing large masses of people, they are beholden to those whose finances brought them into power. They’re caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. Mostly, they have chosen to bail out banks rather than the American middle class. Hence the anger of the average person.
This anger is not unique to our country alone. As I predicted in my May article, governments in Europe are now putting austerity plans into place to cut benefits, retirement, and social services for their middle classes. They do this in the name of saving their so-called “essentials.” But what does that really mean? It means cutting their deficit and transferring more wealth from the middle class into the hands of the rich financiers.
The populations at large in Europe and the United States are slowly becoming aware of the growing injustice. That’s why people are striking all over Europe. That’s why people continue to speak out against the collusion between the government and the financial sector here at home.
We have to stop our elected officials from thinking that it’s okay to be beholden to bankers first and the people last. They need to understand that it’s the people that pay their salary and man their yachts and mansions who need help. It’s the people who have to fight inflation, layoffs, and cuts in their pensions and benefits. When the housing bubble collapsed, Americans suffered hugely from the devaluation of their main assets, their homes, while the bankers filled their pockets and passed on the mortgages in the form of national debts to foreign banks. But everyone suffers when governments put financiers and bankers above the people. Now the chickens are coming home to roost in Spain, Portugal, France, Hungary, Italy and Romania, in addition to Greece.
The Supreme Court ruling that corporations are legal persons has changed the value of our vote drastically. It’s no longer one man, one vote. Now that corporations are legal persons with unlimited funds for campaign contributions, CEOs and corporate fat cats can essentially buy many, many votes. Their representation is as big as their wallet.
If this is not corrected, our democracy is essentially gone.
According to Plato and Rousseau, the path in a degrading democracy is either back to oligarchy, as Republicans are pushing for, or tyranny, where a populist leader galvanizes workers’ anger into a one-man dictatorship. At present our country and those of Europe are democracies in trouble. We should be aware not to fall prey to either, oligarchy or dictatorship. We should turn our anger and energy toward building institutions to support, educate and improve our democracy and make a more equitable and just society.
America has always been at the forefront of innovation and a leader in social change. I hope that this time we are not the leader in degrading our democracy, but have the wisdom to direct our outrage to produce a better government.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Why Does the Predictable Ad Game Fascinate Journalists So Much

by , under NEWS
Why Does the Predictable Ad Game Fascinate Journalists So Much

The Spot Blog’s Spotted Correspondent writes today that a new Sen. Michael Bennet ad is “unfairly misleading in its portrayal” of Ken Buck.
His proof? A column by the nonpartisan GOP stalwart Vincent Carroll, a Post columnist.
He then points to fact checkers that found portions of a previous Bennet ad “wanting,” without mentioning that the fact checkers found numerous portions of Bennet’s previous ads to be true.
And the Spot doesn’t mention that fact checkers have been critical of Ken Buck’s ad too, as well as ads by outfits like the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which support Buck.
This is how News 4 introduced its “Reality Check” of a recent attack ad by Ken Buck:
In response to Buck’s claim that “Bennet’s votes are so bad he can’t defend them,” News 4 found that Bennet in fact “does defend his votes on the health care, the stimulus, and the budget.”
“As for [Buck's] claim he voted for higher taxes 24 times, that’s misleading at best,” News 4 reported, adding that Bennet has “never voted for a measure that would specifically raise taxes.”
With respect to Buck’s claim that “Bennet is legislating unemployment,” News 4′s Reality Check stated that Bennet “did not, of course, pass a law to set the unemployment rate.”
“Bottom line,” News4 states, “Ken Buck is doing what Republicans across the country are trying to do, pin the country’s economic woes on their Democratic counterparts. As I’ve said here before, there’s plenty of blame to go around.”
Last night, 9 News analyzed a National Republican Senatorial Committee ad stating that:
“Bennet even raised taxes $525 billion. A jobs killer.”
9 News found this…false!
9 News also researched this statement in a National Republican Senatorial Committee ad:
“He [Bennet] voted to gut Medicare. ($500 billion)
9 News found this … false!
“If anything, seniors who are on basic Medicare will now have more access to preventive services and eight million will also be spared significant prescription drug costs if they fell into the so-called doughnut hole created by Medicare Part D. (Source: New York Times, June 18″
The Spotted Correspondent, like everyone else who watches TV, has got to know that portions of most all political ads are found to be misleading or false by fact checkers. I wish that weren’t the case, but it is.
The Spotted Correspondent and I would undoubtedly prefer to watch ads by fact checkers not political campaigns. But that won’t be happening.
So journalists, and commentators like the Spotted Correspondent, are left to sort out the key issues, whether they are in the ads or not, and try to make sense of them for voters.
Accusing one side’s ads of being insulting, as if the other side’s aren’t–when we all know the entire ad game is gross–misleads voters into thinking the ads matter more than the issues at hand.
In other words, we’ll get more from comparing the candidates’ positions on the issues than comparing their ads.

Follow Jason Salzman on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BigMediaBlog

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

CicLAvia Is What Ill Be Doing in LA This Sunday

by , under NEWS
CicLAvia Is What Ill Be Doing in LA This Sunday

Back in February, when I first wrote about CicLAvia in Public Space = Public Health my hope was that the piece would help call attention to a terrific civic idea that marries fitness and physical activity with an enlightened vision of how we use our public streets. With LA’s first CicLAvia planned for Sunday, I feel like an expectant uncle.
As an urbanist to the core, I wish I had a role in planning this thing, which I first learned about from the Green LA Institute’s Jonathan Parfrey. Thanks Jonathan, but I merely wrote about it.
It is the smart, lean and tireless team of public space activists who get credit for pulling off what earlier this year didn’t always look like a done deal. After all, it will cost the city some money to provide police, sanitation and street services for the event and as Angelenos know too well, there is not a lot of that lying around unclaimed these days. Given their superior organizing skills, perhaps for their next act the CicLAvia team can turn its attention to making public transportation the way most Angelenos get around. We can sure use the help.
To its credit, the City of LA recognized in CicLAvia an opportunity to give Angelenos a taste of what LA can be like, at least for a bit, without cars. As with the LA Marathon which also closes parts of LA to motorized traffic, for those who participate CicLAvia will be a chance to recalibrate and rethink our usual Sunday routine. And it will temporarily turn the streets over to those who deserve them the most. Us.
So what is CicLAvia anyway? Perhaps the best way to get a sense of the event, which will limit seven miles of otherwise busy streets to walkers, skaters and bikers between the hours of 10 am and 3 pm this Sunday, is to look at some of the short films that reveal what other cities have made of similar events. All this week, the civic-minded site la.streetsblog has been running great shorts that capture the spirit of the event in places like Bogot, Colombia where the program originated and occurs each Sunday, and New York City, where the Department of Transportation has created Summer Streets. While the likes of Madison Avenue gave New York’s event a nice name, I am partial to CicLAvia, a riff on Bogot’s Ciclova and an obvious acknowledgement of El Pueblo de la Reyna de los Angeles’ Spanish heritage and culture.
But CicLAvia will not just be fun. In a not to be underestimated way, it is part of a critical public health strategy for altering the way Angelenos live and spend their free time.
Like Bogot, where up to 1.5 million people or 30 percent of the population routinely participate in Ciclova, LA is plagued by polluted air and a growing epidemic of childhood obesity and diabetes. According to the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, in parts of Los Angeles, 36.8 percent of children are overweight and do not get the regular exercise they need. In CicLAvia there is a easy-to-enjoy and overdue way to get out from in front of the TV and away from Facebook, while getting a look at the city from a perspective we all too rarely get to experience.
As I wrote in February, I loved CicLAvia from the moment I learned about it because I grew up riding my bike along New York’s closed Bronx River Parkway on warm Sunday mornings. That I am sure is why I can’t wait to ride through LA’s People’s Park and plan to continue to dream about and work for other visionary changes to LA’s streetscape. My short list includes the Park 101 plan to cap part of the 101 Freeway with a park, Santa Monica’s Palisades Garden Walk & Town Square project and most importantly, the 30/10 Initiative which will build thirty years of overdue public transportation projects within a decade. The 101 and Santa Monica projects will give LA two parks like NY’s much loved High Line while 30/10 will give Angelenos the public transportation they have long deserved.
As CicLAvia’s Stephen Villavaso told me in February, in a park poor city like LA, “CicLAvia creates a park by removing motorized traffic from city streets, and encourages people to come out and carve a new landscape for themselves.”
Even in this tough economic environment, CicLAvia is an idea that will sell itself. Which is why the Bogot-born concept has also spread to Mexico City, Guadalajara, Santiago, Quito, El Paso, Portland, Chicago, New York, San Francisco and Miami. Joining them, LA will be in great company and, if the gods and weather are with us, there will be no going back to all cars, all of the time.
Click on the 7 mile route map to see where the fun will take place and please take Metro to get to CicLAvia if you are not within biking or walking distance. Rain or shine, on Sunday I will be there. To not be there, would be to miss out on the chance to take in LA’s streets as they should be more often.

Follow Joel Epstein on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/thejoelepstein

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Brooklyn Gets Its First 2 MichelinStarred Chef Cesar Ramirez

by , under NEWS
Brooklyn Gets Its First 2 MichelinStarred Chef Cesar Ramirez

It’s all about the food at Brooklyn Fare Kitchen’s Chef’s Table, where Chef Cesar Ramirez just got his two Michelin stars. Two well deserved stars, and the only two in Brooklyn.
Located on a funky stretch of Schermerhorn Street in downtown Brooklyn, Brooklyn Fare Kitchen is way off the beaten culinary path of Manhattan, where Cesar Ramirez was once the Chef de Cuisine at Bouley back when it had two Michelin stars.
“Tomato” (Photo by Douglas Kim, member of the Brooklyn Fare Kitchen team)
It’s not just the location that makes the Michelin Guide’s two star rating all about the food, it’s also the fact that since the remodel back in July, they’re still waiting for their liquor license. So, it’s BYOW (for wine, usually very fine wine). With no wine list as yet and no fancy address, it’s clear the Michelin reviewers were thinking about the food when they awarded the two star rating.
When I spoke with Cesar this morning shortly after he got the call from Jean-Luc Naret, the Director of the Michelin Guide, he was floored. A humble chef with huge talent, he said, “I can’t believe this, I mean, we’re part of a grocery store in Brooklyn!”
That said, they did just undergo an incredible remodel, bumping seating up from 12 to 18, and making Brooklyn Fare Kitchen just about the prettiest kitchen in New York City. Ramirez said, “We really wanted to do the remodel right. We got the best china, wine glasses, a Molteni stove, a custom-made work space, everything is beautiful.”
The remodeled Kitchen (Photo by Douglas Kim)
Jean-Luc Naret was quoted on GrubStreet New York as naming Ramirez’s Chef’s Table as one of the best three meals he had in the world this year. Putting Ramirez’s Chef’s Table at Brooklyn Fare Kitchen in the top three spots to dine anywhere, in the eyes of the man who makes, or breaks, the reputations of chefs and restaurants. Pretty awesome for what NYMag.com called a “glorified bodega.”
Ramirez was beside himself. “When Jean-Luc and his wife came into the restaurant, they couldn’t believe what we were doing here. I’ve kept the concept simple, you eat in the kitchen, on my work space. And I never compromise on getting the very best ingredients.”
“Scallop” (Photo by Douglas Kim)
Having dined there a couple of times myself, I say from experience, Cesar and his team, Douglas and Chris, deserve their two Michelin stars. The chef is out-of-this world talented, and the food he and his team offer up from the dazzling new kitchen is beyond wonderful. If you can manage to nab a seat or two at this long-waitlisted Kitchen, you’ll find the trip to Brooklyn, and the not remodeled employee bathroom, all part of what makes Brooklyn Fare Kitchen one of a kind.
The Chef’s Table at Brooklyn Fare Kitchen is $135 per person, prix fix, BYOW
200 Schermerhorn Street, BROOKLYN, NY
1.718.243.0500
On Facebook

Follow Regina Varolli on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/ReginaVarolli

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

The Karmic Haunting of Kim

by , under NEWS
The Karmic Haunting of Kim

One of the surest signs of a great film is how much it haunts you after the screening.I know I have seen something top-drawer when I am brushing my teeth, backing the car into a parking spot, having a cup of afternoon coffee – and scenes from a movie seen months ago suddenly pop into my head. By this yardstick the South Korean film made by Ki-duk Kim in 2003 – called Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring – has to be among the best films I have seen this year. Six months later it is still stalking my imagination. It did very well on the film festival circuit back in 2003.
A friend originally urged me to see the Korean film, knowing, as she did, it vaguely paralleled the novel I am currently writing, called Buddhaland Brooklyn. Both my book and Kim’s film are loosely built around a Buddhist priest and a temple and their various transformations over four seasons, which is an established Asian literary tradition where the four seasons are not to be viewed as a literal sequence of linear time, but symbols of transformations taking place within a person during an entire lifetime.
But there our two works part company.I don’t want to give away the film’s plot here, but Kim’s work is about an aging Buddhist priest and his young acolyte. It’s a very stark and shocking human story that unfolds against an incredibly bucolic and tranquil-looking temple grounds and setting. The film is really about passion and attachments and the reason for being and the illusions of life and, most importantly, about karmic retribution.
That, I think, is what this movie is really about. Most Westerners have a sanitized and sentimental image of Buddhism, where tolerance and wisdom are the key drives of a “philosophy.” In reality many Buddhist sects are as fundamentalist and rigidly doctrinaire as any sects found in the Judeo-Christian tradition. I think this film does a brilliant job bringing the profound doctrine of karma to life. No-character in this film – and I mean no-one – can escape the karmic ripples and repercussions of their actions. Watch closely to what happens to the mother, towards the end of the movie, after she abandons her out-of-wedlock child at the temple.
Kim is like Hitchcock – a seemingly inconsequential act instantly creates karma that ripples disastrously through the universe. So do yourself a favor. Get your hands on a copy of Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter and Spring. This cinematic Buddhist fable will open your Third Eye.

Follow Richard C. Morais on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/richardcmorais

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

A Slow Simple Appraoch to Potty Training at 15 Months Old

by , under NEWS
A Slow Simple Appraoch to Potty Training at 15 Months Old

My 15-month-old asked to go poop last week. It sounds strange because I wasn’t really trying to train her yet (despite my concerns about disposables and landfills). Though I suppose in some ways I’ve been training her since day one.
My “European” method for potty training
I’ll call it the “European” method, though let me be clear, the norm here is probably more similar to the United States where most parents wait for a magic age when their kid will be ready to be trained in 3 days: in the U.S. that tends to be closer to three years old, while here it’s closer to two (For more, see my post “Who decides when to potty train: you, baby or Big Diapers?”).
My method is really just something I’ve gleaned from conversations with a few moms. These are the women who explain to you — like the Parisian I met on the airplane heading to San Francisco last June — that they’ve been putting their 13-month-old son on the potty for a few months now. It’s not a strict thing, just a slow, simple approach.
When asked, they don’t usually know anything about Elimination Communication (EC): the practice where parents try to read their kids’ needs and then cue them to go over a toilet even as early as a month or two old (For visuals, see video On the toilet at 6 weeks old).
Rather than being part of a movement — EC or otherwise — these early start parents seem to do it because it just makes sense to put your kid on the toilet if you see him making an effort to eliminate. And then it becomes habit. Though it’s not really something you have to do every time since many of these women have full-, or part-time jobs.
Modified elimination communication
With my first child my mother put a lot of time in training her early, but until 16 months she had never even seen a potty (See video Potty diaries: waiting for baby). So with baby number two, I decided to introduce the ideas — in a very casual way — a bit earlier.
Really all I did was tell her every time she went poo by repeating the words “caca” (Spanish baby talk for poop) and then pulling out the toilet around one-year-old a handful of times to just get her used to the idea.
There was no rhyme or reason — or really much effort — to the process, but suddenly last week, at age 14 months 3 weeks, my toddler asked to go “caca.” I was so startled I wasn’t sure if I should act on it, but after a moment’s hesitation, I did.
More potty training videos from faircompanies
Potty training at 16 months: meet the potty and your poop
Potty diaries: waiting for baby
Quality time on the loo
Starting to ask to go
Toilet training on the train

Follow Kirsten Dirksen on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/kirstendirksen

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

New 2010 VotingEligible Population Estimates Available

by , under NEWS
New 2010 VotingEligible Population Estimates Available

Among the information I provide are United States turnout rates for those eligible to vote. When I first published these statistics about a decade ago, I showed that the much lamented decline in voter turnout was a myth. Turnout had not declined, the ineligible population had increased. Indeed, in 2008 we reached the “high” levels of turnout in the 1950s and 1960s. These turnout rates are now used widely by the media and academia. Pick up an American politics textbook, and you’re likely to see these turnout rates.
With that in mind, the time has come to release the 2010 voting-age and voting-eligible population estimates.
Perhaps the most interesting trend in these statistics is that the non-citizen population of the United States is growing smaller. The Census Bureau’s American Community Survey shows that the percentage of non-citizens among the voting-age population has decreased from 8.6% in 2006 to 8.3% in 2010. There are two likely causes for this decline. The most obvious is the economy is making America a less attractive place for jobs. The less obvious is that in 2007 Immigration and Naturalization Services cleared a sizable backlog in the number of citizenship applications.
As the election draws near, I will again track early voting numbers. These numbers, along with turnout in comparable state races will enable me to make a 2010 turnout rate forecast. Of course, after the election, I will post the final turnout rates using the numbers reported by state election officials.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Stars and Old Pals Come Together in NYC on John Lennons Birthday

by , under NEWS
Stars and Old Pals Come Together in NYC on John Lennons Birthday

Charity Concert This Saturday In Manhattan Features Artists Aged Nine To Ninety
Pete Seeger, Tom Paxton, Neil Innes, Earl Slick, Mark Hudson, Marshall Crenshaw, Tom Chapin, Glen Burtnik & many more team up with Lennon’s first band The Quarrymen (The Band That Became The Beatles) to salute Lennon on his 70th birthday
John Lennon with his band The Quarrymen on Saturday July 6th 1957. Photographed just one hour before John Lennon & Paul McCartney met for the first time — the ‘Big Bang’ that led to the Beatles. Photo: 1957 & 2010 — Geoff Rhind
This Saturday — October 9th — is the exact 70th anniversary of John Lennon’s birth. There are multiple celebrations taking place worldwide, including the US release of the superb movie Nowhere Boy about Lennon’s teenage years, the formation of his band The Quarrymen and how it evolved into The Beatles.
One of the most poignant and joyous salutes will take place in a concert hall in Manhattan that is just six blocks from both the Dakota building where John Lennon lived for the last nine years of his life — and from the Strawberry Fields Memorial to Lennon in Central Park.
For in the concert hall of the quaintly named “Society For Ethical Culture” (located at the corner of West 64th Street & Central Park West) this Saturday night will be a collection of music stars and friends of John Lennon who are gathering to pay an informal musical tribute to Lennon with a charity concert in support of the human rights organization Amnesty International.
Headlining the “Happy Birthday John!” benefit show are THE QUARRYMEN — the still-active founding members of John Lennon’s original band (formed in 1956) who have reunited to play this special concert in New York honoring their childhood friend and bandmate on his birthday. The band will be playing the skiffle and early rock ‘n’ roll songs that they played together with Lennon, Paul McCartney and George Harrison in the years up till 1960 when the John/Paul/George nucleus changed the band’s name to “The Beatles” — and thereafter enjoyed some modest success…
The still-active founding members of The Quarrymen in 2010. Left-to-right: Colin Hanton, Rod Davis, Len Garry. Photo 2010 — Frank Rooney
Underscoring the universal appeal of John Lennon’s music across the generational universe, the list of guest performers who will all be performing Lennon songs goes across the age range from 9 to 90.
At the highest end of the age spectrum is the venerable PETE SEEGER (91-years-young) who has declared that he “must show up for John Lennon.” He will be leading a mass rendition of Lennon’s 1969 peace anthem “Give Peace A Chance” — together with a choir of youngsters from the age of 9 upwards called The RiverTown Kids, who Seeger has been mentoring.
Among the other performers with Lennon connections and a desire to help Amnesty are:
EARL SLICK — the David Bowie guitarist who worked on Lennon’s final album (1980′s Double Fantasty) and previously on Lennon’s 1975 collaboration with David Bowie, “Fame.”
NEIL INNES — the former Bonzo Dog Band and Monty Python songster who co-created the affectionate Beatles pastiche The Rutles and played the Lennon-esque Ron Nasty. Innes appeared with Lennon in the 1967 Beatles film Magical Mystery Tour.
TOM PAXTON — the revered folk singer who first came to prominence in the 1960s and who composed the song “Crazy John” in 1969 as an ode of appreciation to Lennon for his pioneering political activism.
MARSHALL CRENSHAW — the iconic singer-songwriter who became successful in the 1980s for his Lennon-style songs. Crenshaw had portrayed Lennon in the stage show Beatlemania and subsequently played the part of Buddy Holly in the film La Bamba.
MARK HUDSON — one of the Hudson Brothers who enjoyed success as a comedy-rock trio in the 1970s — Hudson was a friend of Lennon’s from that period. His credits as a record producer and writer include Ringo Starr, Ozzy Osbourne, Harry Nilsson, Hanson and Aerosmith.
GLEN BURTNIK – former member of the band Styx who appeared in the Broadway production of “Beatlemania” as Paul McCartney, alongside Marshall Crenshaw, who played John Lennon. He has written hits for Patty Smyth and Don Henley.
TOM CHAPIN — Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter also known for his children’s music. The brother of the late Harry Chapin, he appeared in the Broadway production of Pump Boys and Dinettes, among several shows.
GARLAND JEFFREYS — cult singer-songwriter of African-American and Puerto Rican descent. His music is a unique blend of rock ‘n’ roll, reggae, blues and soul. Worked with Lou Reed and John Cale before embarking on his solo career.
NEVER SHOUT NEVER — the stage name for 19-year-old Chris Ingle — a new artist from Missouri with a remarkable 800,000 fans on Facebook. Recently signed by Warner Bros Records after a major label bidding war sparked by his massive internet following.
BLUEBERRY ACRES — a band of four teenage boys from Ringwood, NJ, who are all age 15 or 16 — the same ages that John Lennon and his pals were when Lennon started his first band. Winners of the annual “Battle of the Beatles Bands” contest at the official Beatles fan convention. The band recently performed at the party following the US premiere of Nowhere Boy in front of Michael Stipe, Courtney Love, Billy Connolly, Kristin Scott Thomas and other celebrities.

Follow Martin Lewis on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/TheMartinLewis

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Meet Harry Wilson Candidate for NYS Comptroller

by , under NEWS
Meet Harry Wilson  Candidate for NYS Comptroller

In these times when it’s clear to all that our state government in Albany is wildly and hopelessly dysfunctional – and no political aspirant for any job seems to be up to the task of governing – or even capable of talking about the task of governing, I may have experienced something akin to what happened when Rolling Stone writer Jon Landau went to a Bruce Springsteen concert in 1974 and proclaimed that he “saw Rock and Roll future and its name is Bruce Springsteen.” Likewise, last week, in a wonky way, I met and interviewed the individual who could be New York’s future, and his name is Harry Wilson. If any one individual is capable of engineering New York State’s government back to fiscal sanity and probity and even possibility, the Republican candidate for State Comptroller, Harry Wilson, will be the one to do so. Nothing less than a whirlwind to interview, he is one of the most genuine, enthusiastic and whip-smart aspirants for public office that I’ve come across. Wilson plans to ramp up the office of state comptroller as a primary catalyst in reforming the finances and the structure of New York State government. In a way — his vision for the job parallels the transformation Eliot Spitzer wrought on the role of the Attorney General’s office.
Below is my slightly edited interview with Harry Wilson which occurred last week over breakfast at a diner in Scarsdale near Wilson’s home. [ed. with many thanks to blogger/writer/politico Charmian Neary for setting up the interview and for her help in background and context]
DS: Tell me why you got involved and what prompted you to run for, of all political offices, state comptroller:
HW: I returned from Washington last year after finishing my work up with General Motors. [for background on Wilson's role in the Obama administration's auto industry task force see this piece by Wayne Barrett in the Village Voice: http://bit.ly/9x99W7 I had left my investment firm in anticipation of the birth of our 4th daughter because I wanted to get more involved in public service and spend more time with my family. I was working like 20 hours a day pretty much since high school - and I asked myself is this how I want to spend the next 20 years of my life. I had worked with charitable organizations but I never really had much time to give. And I wanted to spend more time and more focus on my family and public service. I have four children: 9,7, 5, and 2. I was not spending enough time with them and that's what really catalyzed my decision making process on this.
Around January of 2008 I started thinking seriously about what I was going to do - and made the decision to leave my firm in August. I spent my time getting in quality family time, investing personal capital, doing charity work, and trying to get back into shape. I was happily doing that into early 2009 when suddenly it looked like the world was about to end - it felt like we were about to enter a second Great Depression. My wife and I talked about this a lot and about how I could get involved and contribute. Although I was in financial services, I worked mostly with manufacturing operations and less with banks. I had this really deep skill set in restructuring companies, and I looked at the problems that Washington was wading into with the financial services sector and the auto industry. I was worried that they were going to throw a lot of money at the problem and not fundamentally try to change the structure of these industries. I was deeply concerned about the economy. Growing up, my mom was laid off from her job from time to time and it really affected us.
DS: So how did you actually get involved with the restructuring of GM?
HW: Steve Rattner's name was being floated to be the car czar. I had never met him before - but I got his email address from folks who did and sent him a blind email describing my background and expertise. I told him that I'm a registered Republican and a free market guy so if that's a problem for him and the administration - they should tell me now rather than waste everyone's time. He called me back right away and we met. I had no desire to serve in the administration, but I really wanted to help solve what appeared like an unsolvable problem. We got together and agreed we wouldn't decide what was going to happen until we actually got there, and I think that was a prudent approach.
So after the task force work I came back home, and a good friend of mine, a Democratic friend, said that the Democratic party in New York State is broken. It's broken and there's no competition. We need really talented Republicans to run for office and you should think about it. I said, "that's all very nice but I have no interest in running for office" - and she said "well let me introduce you to a friend of mine." I said OK - and it was Adam Stoll who ran Governor George Pataki's last campaign for Governor. He and I met and he brought up the US Senate seat held by Kirstin Gillibrand and a congressional seat. I told him that I had no interest in being a legislator. I don't have that experience or mentality. As a junior member of the legislature - Senate House or otherwise, I wouldn't really have an impact and that didn't appear very interesting. Spending half my time in Washington and half my time here also didn't interest me. Then Adam came back to me in late October of 2009 and asked, "what do you think about Comptroller? " I knew that the comptroller manages the state pension fund and I said that if I wanted to do that I'd do it for real. I could imagine going into government to help people but not going into government to manage money. Adam said that the Comptroller has a slew of untapped powers that no one's really used to drive fiscal issues in New York. He compared it to how the Attorney General's office was a dozen years ago and how utilizing the office can effect change. He gave me some background then I did my own research - really digging into the powers of the office -- the constitutional powers and the statutory powers and how the job has evolved over time. I was also digging into the state's finances and how bad they were. From that I found two things: (1) I found the state's finances were far worse than expected. The State does not make projections and it does not do consolidated statements. So no one in New York State pulls together the on -balance sheet debt and the off -balance sheet debt, pension obligations, retiree obligations - no one projects all of that forward - no one does that. And when you do, it's actually horrible. I came to understand that the Comptroller has a number of dormant powers - with the sizeable staff of the office and the audit power, the comptroller function has been underutilized -- really small dollars have been realized out of the comptroller audits. For example recently the Comptroller conducted an audit of $50,000 in expenditures and then went to two local campaign stops. The Comptroller's Office has been underutilized to audit state agencies. My expertise could really drive some meaningful reorganization of state government. We could conduct a top to bottom review of spending line item by line item - and also look at the efficacy of how we deliver state government services. Any constitutional office in the executive branch can be leveraged to accomplish something - and I have no interest in just holding a job in the way that appears to be Mr. DiNapoli's approach to the job. The job has the potential to make major change. If things were running fine I would have no interest in the job.
DS: Given your background - how can you facilitate restructuring state government and its ossified institutions and work with the state legislature.
HW: OK so let's distinguish between the substance and the political. The substance: what's a better way to do things - where are the redundancies? Over the course of the first year I would really go through the operations of state government and create a reorganization plan that will result in lower spending and better delivery of services. There may be an array of ways to accomplish that. I would then layout a series of policy choices that would be made by the governor and the legislature that could be framed as options: here's how you could do this function and at this cost - and lay out an alternative, perhaps a better way. That's the substance. For the policy piece you have to get the Governor and the State Senate on board. While it would be great to get the Assembly onto this, you have to be realistic. The only way to be a successful governor of the State of New York at this time - is to deal with spending. In 1995 or 1985 you could be a successful governor more easily because there was a more thriving economy. We just don't live in that world anymore and we won't for the next several years. Both candidates for Governor see that and see that it's in their best interests to do deal with spending. As far as my role, I've spent my whole career staying out of the media due to the frequently confidential issues of my business dealings -- so I don't have a need to be in the spotlight. If I did I wouldn't be running for comptroller! As for the Senate - Republicans historically were not much different from the Democrats - signing off on bad budgets. But you will see the Senate balance of power in 2011 shift to be a more reform oriented body. Lee Zeldin in Long Island, Jack Quinn. Young, fresh , idealistic new members will come in. On the Assembly Silver will still have a substantial majority - maybe slightly less than he has today. But there appears to be no threat to his leadership role. I foresee developing a bipartisan coalition for reform among the Governor, the Senate and the Comptroller - and I see myself in the job as providing some of the intellectual underpinning for that. I'll have the staff and the experience to identify the cost savings. The Governor obviously has professional staff in the budget office and I foresee working with them very closely. So that's the coalition I see forming. It's a function of logic - and also of self interest - theirs, not mine. And let them drive that - let them be the public face of reform. And embarrassment will be a driver too - there are hundreds of programs that won't pass the test of public scrutiny.
DS: It seems to me that the two primary functions of the State Comptroller's office are incompatible - being the chief fiscal officer and being the sole trustee of the state employee pension fund. If you want to be a reform/change agent for the state --- that would seem to be to conflict with your fiduciary obligations with respect to the state pension fund oversight.
HW: While the functions of the office are seemingly incompatible - they actually can be synergistic. Regarding pensions, DiNapoli's view is to not advocate for any changes. In the last legislative session there were about 50 pension sweeteners pending - and everyone knows we can't afford to pay for the existing pension benefits let alone add to them. This is a real failure of leadership. I don't blame the public sector unions and their members - it's the politicians - the management team. In part it's because they've operated under the assumption, espoused by Tom DiNapoli, that the pension fund is over funded. But now even DiNapoli admits that is not the case. We started highlighting the fact that the fund was operating under overly rosy assumptions and that the pension fund costs were going to skyrocket. DiNapoli attacked me and said I was irresponsible and didn't know what I was talking about. Then all we did was ask him to release his assumptions and by doing so prove us wrong. But he didn't release them. He refused. [ed. Note Wilson filed a freedom of information request last June and had yet to hear on that request as of the date of this interview] By painstakingly doing our research from available data, we found that the tax impact per household to stabilize the pension fund would be about an additional $1,300 per year. DiNapoli said everything was fine – we’re fine with an 8% fund earnings assumption and that we’re over funded – and Wilson doesn’t know what he’s talking about. I issued a 50 page white paper that the New York Times covered. After the release of my report, DiNapoli held a press conference that announced they were going to reduce the earnings assumption to 7.5% — and that we’re not fully funded – but that the fund is about 94% funded. So now he’s admitted to a part of the problem – but in fact that’s only a tiny fraction of the problem. Then Orin Kramer in an op-ed in the New York Times cited my findings in a think piece about pension reform – and I had never met Orin Kramer before. So what you have is taxpayers and local government officials who have to make up the shortfall on the one hand vs Albany politicians who’ve made promises they probably don’t understand and that we can’t afford on the other. That’s the debate for this race – and if people really understood it that way – this would be a landslide election. Let’s be honest about it – if people in Albany really understood the scope and depth of our state government financial situation, we wouldn’t be talking about sweetening pension benefits but fixing them. It’s a fact of life that politicians like opacity when dealing with financial issues.
DS: There’s been some discussion and perhaps some contrast between you and Tom DiNapoli on pension fund management – and in the wake of the Comptroller Hevesi scandal whether the comptroller should be the sole trustee. What’s your take?
HW: Tom DiNapoli hasn’t made a proposal – he said he likes the set up the way it is but if the legislature changes the role he’ll live with that too. My approach is different in two respects: one — how decisions get made for the fund and two — asset allocation of the fund. The virtue of the sole trustee is that you have one person accountable and with an incontrovertible mandate to protect the pension fund against raids. Ironically, Tom DiNapoli proposed and supported such a raid on the pension fund to balance the state budget in 2009. The Assembly voted yes, and the Senate voted no – but as for the Senate, this vote occurred in the middle of the coup by Pedro Espada and friends, and the vote against the plan was viewed by some as just a slap at DiNapoli because he was withholding legislators’ pay – as he’s required to do when a budget is late. Reintroduced into the budget this year, supported by DiNapoli, this time it passed. So the State is not paying in $200 million that it’s supposed to be paying in. This is basically a raid on the fund to be used to balance the state budget. It’s outrageous that the public sector unions supported DiNapoli on this front because he’s the one who’s supposed to protecting the fund against these kinds of raids. What about the proper role of the Comptroller being the sole trustee of the pension system? How do you keep the positive and fix the negatives of the sole trusteeship? One is to create an investment committee of world class retired investors and in this state we have more of that than anywhere else in the world. They would do this as public service volunteers. They would advise the Comptroller generally about the economy and optimum asset allocation strategies. And they would provide an ethical backstop to the comptroller on active managers. Any potential active manager would go through the investment committee before they come to me. Let’s take a step back. Let’s forget about how public pensions are managed today and ask what’s the right way to manage. Unlike a mutual fund which generally has a mandate to invest in a particular sector or class of investments, pension funds exist to deliver a constitutionally guaranteed benefit come hell or high water. So you need to manage the level of risk in this pool. You need to have a lower risk pool of assets that can be better handled and perhaps have as a goal a 5-6% return. This would involve less active management and lower fees to the system. The legislature caps risky assets for the fund but doesn’t cap lower risk assets. Alan Hevesi and his successor, Tom DiNapoli have advocated lifting the cap on risky assets, thankfully unsuccessfully. DiNapoli pays $200 million in fees to private equity and hedge fund managers, and $350 million in total fees per year to money managers for the pension system. So in his 3 years as Comptroller, DiNapoli has paid over a billion dollars in fees to Wall Street. And he criticizes me for having actual experience in this field! My approach to pension fund management would actually reduce fees to Wall Street because there would be less active management in the pool. By and large active money managers cannot outperform the market particularly if you tack on the hefty fees they charge – so I would reduce it. I would lessen active management and bring in seasoned retired veterans for outside expertise to advise on asset allocation.
DS: OK – so give me the main takeaway from how you would fix Albany as Comptroller.
HW: I would do 3 primary things – (1) review every dollar top to bottom and propose a restructuring plan for the state as a holistic enterprise; (2) Pension system reform – I would fill the hole without raising taxes and without lessening benefits; and (3) I would perform cost-benefit analysis on all legislation and regulations to ascertain whether it resulted in unfunded mandates – you need to do this for each and every proposal. That’s what the comptroller should be doing. The comptroller should be the objective, professional fiscal overseer of all aspects of state government.

Follow David A. Singer on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/davidasinger

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

New Law Gives a Boost to Surging Workplace Roth Accounts

by , under NEWS
New Law Gives a Boost to Surging Workplace Roth Accounts

A little-noticed provision of a law signed by President Obama this month promises to boost the use of Roth accounts in workplace retirement plans.
The Small Business Jobs Act really has very little to do with retirement saving — it’s aimed at boosting the economy by giving tax cuts and credits to small businesses. But those cuts and credits come with a $12 billion price tag, which the law attempts to offset with a revenue-raising provision that vastly expands the opportunity to convert tax-sheltered retirement savings to Roth accounts.
Unlike tax-deferred accounts, retirement savers use Roths to avoid taxes on investment income down the road by paying income taxes upfront. They’re great for people in lower tax brackets, and for wealthy individuals who want to sock away as much as they can now.
Previously, rollovers were limited to Roth IRAs, and people younger than age 59 generally could do it only when leaving a job.
All limits on income for Roth conversions were removed this year under separate legislation; the new law now makes it possible for anyone to do a conversion with workplace savings, regardless of age. “This law makes tens of millions of people, in essence, eligible for conversion without having to quit their job to do it,” says Dallas Salisbury, president of the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
How do Roth conversions raise revenue? Remember that any funds coming out of a Roth count as taxable income in the year of conversion. The Roth provision — along with some other retirement-related provisions — is intended to offset that by raising $6.6 billion in expected new income tax revenue.
Learn more at Reuters.com.

Follow Mark Miller on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/RetireRevised

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Video News Video on Twitter to Expand as Brightcove Completes Implementation

by , under NEWS
Video News Video on Twitter to Expand as Brightcove Completes Implementation

NEW YORK — With last month’s launch of the new Twitter Web page, selected beta users have been able to embed videos from YouTube and Vimeo.
Now, Brightcove has been authorized by Twitter to have its videos embedded.
Last week, at an Akamai/Brightcove rooftop event, we spoke with Brightcove’s SVP, Marketing Jeff Whatcott about the opportunities for publishers to share video on Twitter. He explains that what shows up on Twitter is the publisher’s custom, branded player with advertising.
Since Brightcove has many big publishers including the New York Times, The Guardian, Time, USA Today, The Financial Times and the Washington Post, we can expect much more news video to surface on Twitter. Surely more video publishers will follow, including the cable networks.
Here at Beet.TV, we have access to the new Twitter site and have been starting to embed our YouTube videos into Twitter posts. It’s quite simple: we cut and paste the URL of YouTube clip (not a shortened URL) into Twitter and the player is created when published. Pretty awesome.
Here is a link to our Twitter post with the Whatcott video from our YouTube channel. (See screen grab below.)
It is a bit more complicated for Brightcove customers who generally use their domain’s own URL. Twitter needs to approve these domains. There are no Brightcove customers active on Twitter yet, we are told.
You can find this post on Beet.TV

Follow Andy Plesser on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/Beet_TV

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

An Open Letter To Broadways Newest Song and Dance Man Billie Joe Armstrong

by , under NEWS
An Open Letter To Broadways Newest Song and Dance Man Billie Joe Armstrong

Dear Billie Joe,
First of all, congratulations to you and Mike and Tre on the sixth anniversary of the release of American Idiot — for my tastes the seminal rock album of the past decade. Of course, congratulations are also in order for all the kudos you received surrounding your Broadway debut as “St. Jimmy” in the musical version of American Idiot. Forgive me, though, for having mixed feelings about the whole Broadway musical thing. I wish I didn’t have those mixed feelings but as a punk rock lover and longtime Green Day fan and purist, I feel conflicted.
Back in 2004, I plugged American Idiot into my CD player, and it became, literally, number one in my rotation, pretty much until the release of Bullet In A Bible a year later.
I spent time in the ’04 election campaigning for John Kerry and even worked Election Day in Ohio in the pouring rain for Election Protection. When George W. Bush came out the winner the next day, the only thing that could lift me out of my funk was American Idiot. Not just another great collection of Green Day songs, but a brilliant concept album, in the tradition of The Who’s Tommy and Quadrophenia.
For every young American who found themselves growing increasingly pissed off about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and positively queasy at the thought of another four years of “W” in the Oval Office, American Idiot became our anthem.
I get Michael Mayer’s temptation to turn American Idiot into a musical. I get it. My wife even took me up to Berkeley to see it in previews before you moved it to the Great White Way. I wanted to love it, and at first I thought I did. But thinking back on it, watching those young, scrubbed, baby-faced kids singing those new harmony-friendly arrangements and doing all that cool choreography just made me want to see the band again.
21st Century Breakdown proved to be as powerful a follow-up to Idiot as any of us could have hoped for. I’ve seen live shows from the last tour so many times my wife worries I’m having some kind of midlife crisis, one where instead of getting a motorcycle or a much younger girlfriend, I spend all kinds of money on eBay buying memorabilia, and worse, leave my family for extended periods of time just so I can follow the band.
That you proved to be a great “St. Jimmy” is no surprise. Anybody who’s seen you onstage knows what kind of chops and charisma you have as a performer. You are punk rock’s Puck.
In the alternate universe my thoughts sometimes drift into, you guys never did a Broadway Musical version of American Idiot, and you never did the recently announced movie version either. Instead you, Mike and Tre did your own rock-n-roll road movie called Hey O! 0- your version of A Hard Day’s Night and The Blues Brothers. The movie opens with you guys feeling burned out after the last stadium show of a big tour, but instead of heading for home, the three of you jump into a van driven by Drunk Bunny and embark on a cross-country punk rock odyssey. Hijinks and fistfights ensue as you find yourselves playing in all the punk dives you played in back in the early 90s. You run into the ghosts of Joey Ramone and John Lennon, and finish up back in Oakland where you play a big benefit concert for 924 Gilman Street where you’re all reunited with your families.
In that same alternate universe, American Idiot and 21st Century Breakdown still exist, but nobody can tell me that you guys aren’t still a punk band and prove it by pointing to American Idiot: The Original Broadway Cast Album or to a YouTube parody called “Green Day On Ice.”
I can’t wait to see what you guys come up with next. God love President Barack Obama, but we’re still at war, the economy remains in the shitter, and there are more idiots in America than ever. In the meantime, I hope and pray I won’t be hearing about the very special Green Day episode of Glee anytime soon.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Guess Who Could Be Funding Those Attack Ads

by , under NEWS
Guess Who Could Be Funding Those Attack Ads

Like many who don’t want this country to become a crazy right-wing Caliphate, I freaked when the Citizens United ruling was decided last January. As if Democratic electeds and policy czars hadn’t screwed us enough already with their chicken shit behavior…now we’d also be swiftboated by unlimited corporate funds. And we might never know which greedy billionaires to blame.
Since donors don’t have to reveal themselves, we couldn’t prove they were funding attack ads likely to widen the moat between their turreted lives and our own. Some enterprising progressive detectives are digging online through the obscured finances of people like the Kochs and astro-turfers like Americans for Prosperity, but these pol owners also buy cash-cowed techies to further disguise their machinations. By next January, we’d remember with gauzy wistfulness the first year of the 2010s — before the overt corporate occupation of America.
The Citizens United decision doesn’t address the homeland of donors. So what would stop multi-national companies or even foreigners themselves from procuring such potential winners as Sharron Angle, Joe Miller, and America’s favorite ex-Wiccan, Christine O’Donnell?
Are the people/corporations behind these mysterious ads necessarily American? Could they be Iranian or Chinese or Russian or even…Osama bin Laden and his minions? After all, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of free speech for all money, not just money that doesn’t want to kill us.
Hyperbolic? In an election cycle highlighted by Kentucky Republicans choosing a Senatorial nominee who’d vote to repeal part of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and New York GOP voters picking as their gubernatorial candidate a reporter-bullying thug who gets yucks by forwarding porn and racist video clips to his online buddies?
This week, ThinkProgress published its investigation of US Chamber of Commerce foreign-sourced campaign contributions, which cites multiple Bahrainian private and state-owned companies, including Gulf Petrochemical Industries. Through these corporations, “the U.S. Chamber of Commerce raises well over $100,000 a year in money from foreign businesses through its operation in Bahrain.”
If money flows to the Chamber from wealthy Bahrainians, it’s not hard to imagine the ultimate. Maybe Osama bin Laden is still tapping oil profits from his royal Saudi family. If you elect candidates whose campaigns run anonymously-financed attack ads, you could be promoting Bin Laden’s faves.
Suddenly I could hear my adopted senseis Karl Rove and Frank Luntz whispering, “Grasshopper! Use their strength against them.”
Dems could produce our own counter ads. For instance, “This funding group,” booms the voice-over guy, “‘Americans for Kittens Who Sleep in Tea Cups’ claims Alan Grayson is in the pocket of the Left Handers’ union. But we couldn’t find any official admitting to a link with ‘Americans for Kittens Who Sleep in Tea Cups.’ Who are they? Are they even American? Maybe they’re from … or … or…”
These TV and radio rebuttals could be mass-distributed throughout the country, leaving space to plug in the name of each candidate being smeared by unidentifiable deep pockets. Possible filthy rich US and foreign financiers could also be mentioned.
We may not get as much airtime as our opponents. But we sure will spur folks to think — a skill many seem to have forgotten this campaign season — before voting us into our country’s future.

Follow Wendy Block on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/WendyJDec

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

ClintonSebeliusObama Apologies for Guatemala Are Just the First Step

by , under NEWS
ClintonSebeliusObama Apologies for Guatemala Are Just the First Step

Last Friday Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued a joint apology for United States Government led experiments conducted during the 1940s in which incarcerated Guatemalans were deliberately infected with syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases. President Obama also telephoned Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom to issue his personal apology.
It is all too easy to dismiss such heinous acts as crimes committed in the distant past, having little relevance to U.S.-Latin American relations today. However, last week’s revelations about the unethical experiments conducted in Guatemala City’s Central Penitentiary afford an opportunity to highlight some of this hemisphere’s greatest health disparities and how we can wipe them out through low-cost solutions.
A 2008 study of parasitic infections in Latin America, published in the Public Library of Science Neglected Tropical Diseases, revealed several stunning statistics. Despite the fact that Guatemala is a relatively small country with a population of only 12 million people, it has the third largest number of some intestinal worm and blinding trachoma infections in the Western Hemisphere, behind only Brazil and Mexico. Indeed, Central America as a whole exhibits some of the highest rates of intestinal worm infections anywhere. The intestinal worm infections belong to a larger group of conditions known as the neglected tropical diseases or “NTDs.” NTDs are now recognized as one of the most potent inducers of poverty. In addition to intestinal worm infections, Chagas disease is a leading cause of serious heart disease in Central America. Chagas disease is a parasitic infection transmitted by a biting assassin bug, which bears some resemblance to a cockroach and lives in poor quality dwellings found throughout the poorest areas of Latin America.
Today, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is supporting NTD control programs in 14 countries, including 11 in Africa, two in Asia, and one in Haiti. In addition, USAID is supporting efforts to eliminate two other NTDs in the Western Hemisphere – lymphatic filariasis and river blindness. Such an effort could also be used to leverage support from private donors in order to reach all children living in poverty. Committing to national NTD activities is one mechanism the U.S. Government could employ to offset the damage done so many years ago.
In 2006, the Global Network for Neglected Tropical Diseases (Global Network) was established to raise awareness and funds for deworming programs and other NTD-control practices. With support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in 2008 the Global Network, in collaboration with the Inter-American Development Bank and the Pan American Health Organization, established a regional initiative to address NTD control in the poorest countries of Latin America, including Guatemala. The partnership aims to harmonize and integrate NTD efforts by working in collaboration with health care systems and other sectoral initiatives, such as education and improvements in water and sanitation. Through our Latin America and the Caribbean NTD Initiative, we look forward to seeing U.S. Government efforts expand to include the other most common NTDs, beginning in Guatemala.
Having tens of millions of people chronically infected with parasitic worms has now been shown to result in devastating consequences not only to the region’s health but also its economic development. Children living in squalor and deep poverty typically harbor worms in their intestines for years. Over time, the worms cause malnutrition and stunt physical growth and intellectual and cognitive development. As a result, children with worms struggle in school, suppressing future wage earnings and trapping poor children in a cycle of poverty.
Extremely low cost solutions are available for controlling the most common NTDs throughout Latin America. Through yearly mass deworming with medicines donated by the major drug companies or those purchased as low-cost generics, it is possible to drastically reduce the number of intestinal worms in the children of Guatemala and elsewhere. This approach has been shown to improve childhood growth and development, school performance and attendance, and may even lift children out of devastating poverty.
Local, national and regional political will and leadership is also needed if we, together, are to meet the target of eliminating lymphatic filariasis, river blindness and trachoma, from the region by 2015. Building on the region’s strong history of implementing successful programs to defeat polio, measles and rubella, Latin America and the Caribbean are now well poised to address NTDs. In addition, a recent commitment by Johnson & Johnson to donate the necessary drugs needed to treat children allows us to ensure reach and help the most marginalized and vulnerable populations.
Simultaneously, there is a need for mechanisms to support innovations such as new treatments and NTD vaccines in Latin America. This year, Brazil’s National Development Bank (BNDES) created a fund for such innovation so that together the U.S. and Brazil could work together to help support a new generation of life-saving NTD pharmaceuticals.
The timely apologies issued at the highest levels of the U.S. Government are welcomed. Now they should be backed up with action across the hemisphere to control or in some cases eliminate the region’s NTDs.
Peter Hotez MD PhD is President of the Sabin Vaccine Institute, which hosts the Global Network for Neglected Tropical Diseases

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Is France Leading Europe Towards a Future When Discrimination Against Minorities Is the Norm

by , under NEWS
Is France Leading Europe Towards a Future When Discrimination Against Minorities Is the Norm

With an estimated 10 million citizens in the EU, the Romani (or Roma) are Europe’s largest minority. Seen as perennial outsiders, they are discriminated against in Romania and Bulgaria no less than in France and Italy.
Now — suffering in the polls — France’s President Sarkozy has ordered that the police clear 300 camps of people, explicitly ordering them to discriminate against the Romani ones. It is an intensification of a trend which has seen 8,000 people deported from France to Romania and Bulgaria this year.
France says they can claim cash resettlement grants. But the climate of fear that the crackdown has created, often compounded by illiteracy and inexperience with interacting with the government, has meant that in practice, many have to leave without the grant, effectively fleeing the country.
Because Romania is a member of the EU, its citizens have the right travel to France and work there. But because Romania is new to the EU, if they can’t find work, they only have the right to be there for three months more. Because of this, Sarkozy’s roundup will affect people who are in France both legally and illegally.
It is this callous disregard for due process, such as checking that someone has no right to be in the country before you deport them — the fussy business of treating people as equal under the law — which is why this plan is so thoroughly illegal and immoral.
Needless to say, France’s crackdown is utterly illiberal. It has been threatened with legal action by the EU’s Justice Commissioner. This from a country which historically prided itself on its liberty.
Still, you cannot measure a country’s values by one action of one government. It is like trying to measure a climate from one temperature reading.
You can, though, measure a country’s values by what its people fight for or protest about. And the French, lest we forget, love a good protest. Earlier this month, over one million people took to the streets in an extraordinary uprising of rage at the government’s proposal to raise the retirement age by two whole years, from sixty. Earlier this year, in May, a powerful farmers’ union decked the Champs Elysees out with grass and showcases of sheep and crops as a ‘celebration’ of French farmers, which resembled nothing so much as a stern reminder to the political class of the farmers’ raw political power at the time when their subsidies are under threat (as they should be).
Given this love of protest and the French pride in the value of libert, you would expect the streets to be full in outrage at such callous treatment of such a politically defenseless minority.
The grounds for protest are multiple, clear, and emotive. A country built on the principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity doing something so illiberal, discriminatory, and cruel; a country with memories of the deportations of Jews — the Roma of their day — under Vichy, doing something so fearfully evocative; a country which aspires to lead a regional group — Europe — which is based on the principle of free movement, denying this principle to people within its own borders; a country which sees itself at the head of a Europe which is expanding eastward sending a clear message that those newcomers were never really wanted; a country unashamed to force some of its weakest residents to pick up their children, their belongings, their careers and hopes, walk out of their front doors, and leave.
A country like France — which sees itself as a leader in Europe — will, of course, be seen as legitimizing discrimination and perhaps even violence. In the last few years, Romani in Hungary, the Czech and Slovak Republics have been beaten, shot, stabbed, and firebombed, with many of the victim’s families and children. Eight have died and dozens have been injured. Each of these crimes has a perpetrator. And if you can picture one of those thugs with a bloodied knife or baseball bat in hand, walking away from a beaten man lying behind him, you have to ask yourself — what message is someone like that likely to take from this new crackdown in France? Surely it is that his violence has been somehow sanctioned and legitimated by the actions of the French government. Surely the message which someone like that will take from the actions of the French government is that somehow — he was on the right track.
In a country which prides itself on both its liberalism and its willingness to protest, you might expect some protest in the name of liberalism.
But such protests as there have been have gathered about 80,000 — not a number that can hold a candle to those protests against a raise in the retirement age or the chance that favored groups will lose their subsidies. Worse, a large majority — about 65% — support the crackdown.
But the really terrifying thing about both the crackdown and the minimal protest it has inspired, is the idea that it might show us where Europe is headed.
Discrimination against minorities in Europe has become ever more blatant in the last ten years than it ever had been before. The last decade saw the National Front reach the final round of the French Presidential Elections, the rise of far right parties in a number of countries, burka bans in France and a ban on new minarets in Switzerland. Intolerance on the continent is in danger of going mainstream — arguably, it already has.
With his deportation of Romani people because they are Romani people — whether or not they are in the country legally — and for electoral gain, we are seeing the start of something much more sinister. The embrace of heavy-handed discrimination of a vulnerable minority by a mainstream political party of a leading European country.
If Sarkozy gets away with it and reaps political gain, surely it is only a matter of time before other European countries follow suit, group deportations are the norm, and Europe sleepwalks towards populist authoritarianism. Surely it is only you and me — the European voter — that can now prevent that sorry outcome.
Azeem Ibrahim is a Research Scholar at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Member of the Board of Directors at the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding and Chairman and CEO of Ibrahim Associates.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

How Rahm Bombed

by , under NEWS
How Rahm Bombed

In a Rockwell-ian retrospective softening of Rahm Emmanuel in the New York Times, David Brooks relates his personal experiences of a kinder, gentler Rahm, one that does not cuss or bully others into submission, as Rahm is regularly described as, even by President Obama. That the only fond thoughts on Rahm’s departure are coming from a conservative Beltway columnist reveals the inefficacy of Rahm as Chief of Staff under the first two years of Obama.
It is tempting to oversimplify Rahm’s impact on the Obama Administration as a short-sighted bully who may well have screwed what could have been a great presidency with his belligerence to cover up his lack of political acumen. So let me dispense with the platitudes and give in to temptation.
Where Karl Rove was “The Architect,” Rahm was more like the shady Chicago contractor you can’t get on the phone. I admonish Rahm because I am sick of bullies, especially ones that stand in the way of work getting done while they flail about abrasively. He chose to intimidate those around him and the base he could take for granted, avoided fights with those provoking a fight, and cut favorable deals for the ones he should have been fighting.
I do not begrudge Rahm his lack of progressive alignment, as many have. Rahm’s well-known contempt for the liberal base that catapulted him into the White House reveals not just a deep disassociation with Middle Class America, but a glaring indication that no matter how loudly he swears, he doesn’t understand how shit works.
When told that progressive groups were considering running ads for a more progressive candidate in a Democratic primary, Rahm called them “f-king retarded!” When Sarah Palin demanded that Obama fire Rahm and managed to make the subject about her, while Rahm had to acquiesce into some special-needs charity gestures. Rahm really should have been required to work for the progressive groups he was cursing out — collecting signatures on the street, having to listen to others’ ideas, and not having anyone from Big Money give a crap about you.
Rahm’s wrath was on display after the fierce primary earlier this year in Arkansas for the Democratic nomination for the Senate seat held by Blanche Lincoln. Bill Halter drew widespread support from progressives and unions to unseat the blue dog Democrat, but incumbents tend to work for other incumbents. The night of Lincoln’s narrow win, a statement smacking of Rahm was issued from the White House: “Organized labor just flushed $10 million of their members’ money down the toilet on a pointless exercise.” In Pennsylvania, when the progressive-backed Joe Sestak won the Democratic primary and retired the White House-backed Sen. Arlen Specter, despite Rahm’s dissuasion via Bill Clinton, those campaign dollars apparently did not go to waste.
It’s not that I am so outraged like Michael Moore that Rahm is so contemptuous of the progressive base of his own party, he would flippantly interject “Fuck the UAW” in a bailout meeting, dismissing the middle class families that comprise it because they lack clout. But I would think Rahm might at least consider the opportunity of appealing to the votes of unemployed auto-workers — they are going to vote for something that improves their situation. Or, you could blow them off and ponder the swelling ranks of the Tea Party.
While famously barbed in his meetings and deal making, it is apparent that Rahm simply doesn’t deal with people or issues he doesn’t want to deal with. Perhaps it is rationalized as go-it-alone or defining new priorities, or showing people up by touting disregard to try to make them feel small. But Rahm’s shoddy record of tenure reveals how small time he really is. Our country languishes today in atrophy from pay to play politics. Rahm is just another player in this, but more like a coach for the neighborhood bar’s softball team, not a Yankee.
Here is the simple truth: Rahm was never thinking about voters. He was thinking about donors. Campaign money means more than votes in his old school mind, so as long as the big donors were getting heard, those liberal losers with websites were just going to have to suck it up and still vote Democratic, because there is no other option.
And so in the course of financial and health care overhaul, concessions were made to giants in insurance, pharmaceutical, banking, and brokerage, after unprecedented bailouts to the financial industry. Even David Brooks alludes to this in his one critique of Rahm: “He made some big mistakes: Trying to use the financial crisis as an opportunity to do everything at once.” Interesting way of putting it — ‘doing’ it for whom?
Come election season, shocker: Republicans are getting more money than Democrats at almost 6 to 1. Karl Rove is sitting on a $50 million dollar slush fund of anonymous cash. Was Rahm actually expecting gratitude, even deference, compared to the party that lives only to de-regulate big businesses? From these titans of greed? Rahm’s savoir-faire is like expecting flowers from the frat guy that told you he had a girlfriend before he date-raped you.
The Rubin-esque financial team assembled under Obama will all be at the Goldman Sachs Holiday Party this year, I have no doubt. And they’ll all be talking about the prospects for business under a well-worn madam like John Boehner as Speaker of the House. The House Minority leader is so shameless, he will keep asking Twitter where the jobs are, while voting to support China’s currency manipulations that deprive jobs in both countries. John Boehner is so shameless he will keep demanding the deficit be reduced first and foremost while in the same breath insisting on extending Bush’s generous tax cuts for the rich that will add billions more to the deficit.
In his gushing NYT column today, Brooks cooed, “Rahm is completely in touch with his affections and aversions. He knows who and what he loves — Obama, Nancy Pelosi” If he loves her, then why hasn’t he helped her stay House Majority Leader? Pelosi in the end is the one that revived the over-compromised health care bill to pass at all. And on the New York Times website, just opposite David Brooks yearbook note to Rahmbo, is Bob Herbert bemoaning the audacity of John Boehner’s tidal wave of money and self-aggrandizement.
Rahm has lost to John Boehner on both counts: He can’t possibly hope to be more shameless an advocate for the rich and win their donations, and he also couldn’t call out a buffoon like Boehner and demonize this guy who spends a third of his year on a golf course. Where the rest of the Republican Party has acquiesced to the far right fanfare about gay Kenyan abortions, Boehner has left himself as the Bill O’Reilly of the GOP, spewing out the same hollow talking points from 2003. At the recent Pledge to America unveiling, Boehner admitted, “we are not going to be any different than we’ve been,” to lay-ups by Stewart and Colbert. And this guy is up to be third in line for the Presidency. Again, like under Bush.
The Obama Administration could have dispatched with Boehner so long ago as the bronzed poster boy for corporate cash while not dignifying the nascent Tea Party rabble with direct criticism, but rather re-directing it at the party responsible for the economy. By acting like Obama was automatically too big for any of this kept his team’s biggest player on the bench.
The Obama Administration’s silence in response to right-wing hysteria has been deafening. While an overarching character trait of Obama’s is to maintain composure in the face of racial hysteria — which tends to be lurking at the bottom of much of the Tea Party — that does not mean that the best thing to do is ignore the outspoken opposition.
The Rise of the Fringe
Obviously you can’t control what your opponents want to think about you when they are coming up with anything that sounds bad, even if they don’t know what it means. Republicans have taken to blatantly wishing bad things to happen to America so that they can get into office, rather than have to come up with a good reason that they should lead. And Rahm can’t be held responsible for the brazen bias of FOX News and News Corp, which has finally dropped all pretenses and started giving millions to Republicans outright.
But the very mindset of having to sell everything to the Beltway, that is the tragic flaw that Rahm brought with him to a leader who literally had both houses of Congress and a laundry list of reforms ready. A master of the House of Representatives who oversaw new candidates into the fold, Rahm advised the President to let Health Care and other policy initiatives run their course through Congress, rather than seem overly reform-minded and getting in front of these important changes he was marshaling into a desperate America (behavior known to some as “leading”).
The carnival atmosphere that has ensued from the fringes of conservatism has been a self-propelling reality show fostered by a corporate media that cares more about getting some crazy on camera than acknowledging issues that actually affect way more people.
Republicans, along with the conservative and mainstream news (nary a difference these days) were outraged that Stephen Colbert testified about migrant farm workers and legalization of undocumented workers. Despite the fact that Colbert has done more to support our troops than they have, or even acknowledge the painful truth that Colbert brought to Congress and the public, these commentators spent a week condemning the very testimony as a stunt and an affront.
This from the party whose own U.S. Representative took to the floor of the House of Republicans to debate provisions of health care legislation presenting a baby. Rep. John Shadegg (R) of Arizona explained that this baby — not even his, just somebody’s baby — apparently knew that health care reform, while good intentioned, was not properly funded, and socialist. While this could have been tied to an amendment lowering of the age to be an elected official to 6 months old, this really was empty showmanship, and should have been called out as the lamest political stunt since the last time John Boehner openly wept.
But even if he was dismissing the increasingly desperate right wing agitprop, there were less-profile, though more crucial responsibilities of Chief of Staff that Rahm neglected as well.
The Justice Department
As detailed in Harpers, one of the primary responsibilities of a Chief of Staff is to fill court vacancies, and by that measure Rahm was a total failure. Scott Horton writes that this “points to a White House that is simply oblivious to the nominations process. On this measure, Rahm Emanuel is the worst performing White House chief of staff in recent memory.” Again, this missed opportunity may enrage progressives, but I am struck by the lack of practical forethought.
Inheriting a Justice Department that had been widely known to be forged at the pleasure of Karl Rove, Harriet Miers, and Alberto Gonzales, not only did the incoming Obama Administration not relieve and rehire US Attorneys as is its right, they let the ongoing US attorney dismissals investigation close abruptly with dubious reasoning.
If there is a Republican majority in the House, I have plain expectations that there will be impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama. For anything. Allegations of smoking in the White House, a non-smoking public building. Hearings for Obama’s birth certificate–not just to prove he was born in America, but to prove he is over 35. Shameless hacks like John Boehner would rather take thousands every day from lobbyists while repeating rhetorical questions in tears, rather than let attention drift to how little the GOP has to offer, or that Boehner is out every evening early making the rounds at DC bars.
A Justice Department that is at best impartial if not disloyal would have staved off whatever cockamamie investigations are sure to come on taxpayer money from blowhard Representatives wielding anonymous babies. A Justice Department that was doing its job would be drawing the line at torture and stopping the illegal imprisonment at Gitmo. And a shrewd Chief of Staff that looked toward the next election (like Karl Rove) would use the Justice Department as the voting rights cops they are supposed to be used, and stop the Republican games of voter suppression from caging that keep coming up every election cycle.
Over at the Justice Department, maybe Attorney General Eric Holder never had the portraits of George Bush taken down, since he seems confused whose administration’s laws he is enforcing. But Rahm knew who his boss was. Rahm didn’t have to clean up the Justice Department because it would have thrilled progressives, or to encourage actual law enforcement and impartiality, but I would think this would happen from the interest of self-preservation alone. It’s like one of the most important courses required to graduate, and Rahm never even showed up for it.
Ironically, this slide down the hustlers’ totem pole for Rahm was precipitated by the failed Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics.
The Chicago Way
A classic Sean Connery movie line written by Chicago playwright David Mamet is delivered in the film The Untouchables: “He pulls a knife you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!” Rahm’s approach seems as corny, and indicative of how short sighted and destructive his tenure as President Obama’s Chief of Staff has been. (On this gruffness, Brooks waxes: “He’s managed to preserve the patois of Chicago, the earthy freneticism of his Augie March upbringing.”)
Rahm’s power play may well not have transpired as we see today had Chicago got to host the 2016 games, instead of the humiliation of early elimination by the International Olympic Committee, who ultimately decided to give it to the Vegas of Violent Crime, Rio. (Have you seen the shocking Sundance documentary Mada Bala (Send a Bullet)? Yeah, apparently neither has the IOC. Chicago should have just bought the IOC a copy.)
Chicago was so broke, it made the ill-advised deal to privatize all of the city’s parking meters to some company for $1 billion cash upfront. The deal is for over 75 years, three generations of Chicagoans. Talk about mortgaging your children’s future, and for ultimately so little. As Chicagoans exploded over the jacked up costs of street parking, that billion dollars is going to start to look like $26 worth of beads to buy Manhattan.
So the Daley Machine spent whatever money it could get to woo the IOC and advertise the 2016 games like they were already happening ($76 million in the end). Even Perry Farrell had to pander onstage at Lollapalooza (from the mainstage — not the Chicago 2016 stage). This is in spite of the fact that other U.S. cities have made clear their lack of windfalls in hosting the Olympic Games in recent years. While locally not a very popular cause in Chicago and logistically unrealistic (MotherF@#K YOU Dan-Ryan Expressway Interchange) Mayor Daley sunk everything on it as his ticket to payoff the massive debt Chicago was in.
When Daley saw that the wheel of fate hadn’t landed on his roulette color, and watched what was left of Chicago’s cash outlook get scooped away, he knew he was toast. It didn’t matter that Richard Daley had been Mayor for two decades and built his own parallel political machine throughout the wards like the Cheney White House built an in-house military intelligence staff to leave the Pentagon out of the loop. It didn’t matter that by now either his name or his father’s name was inscribed on every piece of Chicago’s stunning architectural skyline. Not only had Daley gambled and lost, he got Rahm to get the Big Man himself to personally pitch their time-share Power Point presentation.
It is doubtful that Obama would have gone to Copenhagen were it not at Rahm’s behest. And that Obama did go all the way there and failed to seal the deal was allowed to be a point of unrestrained glee among conservatives in an alarming parade of spite. A week later, when Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize and would be going back to Copenhagen, those same conservatives were even more vitriolic in their spite. Where the White House was sensitive and downplayed these things, it should have capitalized on the explicit ill-will wished upon our country by the Republican Party, who are never tired of questioning people’s patriotism.
Again: I really don’t care about the Olympics or whatever backroom pipe dreams got cooked up in Chicago. I don’t care if Obama shows up in an Uncle Sam hat to represent our country on the world stage, and I don’t care if the world stage isn’t buying from him, since America tends to have the Olympics here like Andrew Lloyd Weber revivals. But you don’t need to apologize for winning the Nobel Peace Prize.
In the end, I suspect Rahm was being eased out of the bus, and Daley’s vulnerability provided the face-saving opportunity. I wonder if Richard M. Daley heard from Rahm himself, or through an intermediary, that his reign of one-party rule was suddenly coming to an end, because somebody was looking for a new job, one that could possibly sound like a step up from the White House. Daley’s abrupt announcement that he would not be re-seeking election (and the absence of any damning Blago-type scandal surfacing afterward showing he had to bail) seemed so tinny and insincere — as did Rahm’s “surprise” that Daley was stepping down when he had no need to.
Feeling Rahm-orse
If Rahm’s smarts had been questioned, worse still, his effectiveness was called out.
Looking to bolster his rep in the Beltway, Rahm made a plain effort at his own spin in a Washington Post column by Dana Milbank on February 21st. The curious talking-point buffet was immediately called out throughout the media as an unsubtle attempt at self-promotion by Rahm. It was then I first saw the description of Rahm as the “Mayberry Machiavelli.” Even David Brooks agrees: “Over all, Rahm is a warmhearted Machiavellian.” Karl Rove cooked up a sprawling media roll-out for a non-existent threat in Iraq, and we still have 50,000 troops there. Rahm tried to gin himself some good buzz and it couldn’t even survive a news cycle.
Even in aiming small, Rahm has relied on blunt insistence, while preferring to ignore other matters of obvious priority. Worse still, he probably thought he was brilliant for it. Why Howard Dean was shut out of the White House after leading the DNC to a new surge probably has to do with Rahm, whom he had worked closely with in the 2006 50-State strategy. Now that Republicans are employing the same strategy this election cycle, I wonder if putting up with Howard Dean’s pomposity was such an obstacle to retaining power.
But the only real problem with Rahm is that Obama has listened to him. Obama has joked about Rahm’s intemperate management and made it seem okay because it was effective. Roasting Rahm while still in the Senate, Obama quipped that as a teenager working at a deli, Rahm lost the top of his middle finger in an accident, rendering him practically mute. This made Rahm being a well-known jerk apparently okay.
Entourage was Obama’s favorite show on the campaign trail, and this has been widely covered, as has the similarities between Jeremy Piven’s manic bullying character and the Emanuel brothers. The parallels were intriguing — the glamorized insulation of widely loved celebrity among his friends who had his back, with a pit bull of an agent whose abusive means are charmingly justified by the ends. But at some point, I think Obama grasped the shortcomings in Rahm compared to the macho alter-ego of Rahm’s brother Ari on Entourage.
On that show, deus ex machina runs rampant, in a soapy fantasy life kind of thrill. Deus ex machina is a term from Greek drama referring to when a god was introduced to the stage–a crane that would lower an actor from the top of the stage who was wearing a mask that projected their voice, who would make a pronouncement of a sudden change of fortunes for the characters, by the gods’ decree. In storytelling, when a convenient windfall or extraneous gift is given to a character rather than their having worked and built up to it within the story, that kind of easy-writing device is known as deus ex machina. To go from obscurity to president so quickly, Obama must be able to relate to the experience of deus ex machina. And while Entourage isn’t Ayn Rand unrealistic, I fear it affected Obama’s perception of how good of a job macho Rahmbo was doing.
This isn’t lamenting Entourage; that’s the point of the show — to keep seeing how life gets better for these guys in spite of themselves, and we enjoy watching it because that shit doesn’t happen to us. That is what entertainment is for. Even its star Adrian Grenier gets this and made a documentary about it. But I never thought such a wish fulfillment bro-medy could be so dangerous (to grown men with law degrees, anyway).
And so it is with dim hopes that I watch Rahm wade back into the swamps of Windy City politics. It is troubling to know that Chicagoans will be subjected to a resurrected version of the Daley Machine, like another vaguely recognizable Terminator spin-off. Maybe Obama will be himself now; maybe he will dress down his opponents like he does so well when allowed to acknowledge them. And maybe the President will recall that voters got him there, along with a lot of small donations.
At least today, I have no doubt there is celebration among employees in the West Wing. I can only hope they are able to spread their new found freedom to the rest of the country.
John Wellington Ennis’s documentary PAY 2 PLAY studies the Citizens United decision and the need for campaign reform.

Follow John Wellington Ennis on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/johnennis

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Homeowners The Courtroom is Your Battlefield

by , under NEWS
Homeowners The Courtroom is Your Battlefield

My recent book, Mortgage Wars: How You Can Fight Fraud and Reverse Foreclosure predicted that those homeowners victimized by predatory lenders would fight back and win the war against foreclosure. Now, it is happening.
The opportunity for a complete transformation of the global financial services industry is upon us. The halting of recent foreclosures due to sloppy paperwork is just the tip of the iceberg. Ultimately, it will be discovered that the holders of mortgage backed securities have no legal link to the mortgages that secured them due to more sloppy paperwork. This will result in an avalanche of legal proceedings from both homeowners and investors.
If you live in a state that requires a judicial procedure to authorize a foreclosure, you are relatively home free. You must fight back and win. If you have received a Notice of Default or have a scheduled foreclosure sales date, it is imperative that you purchase a mortgage audit to identify predatory and fraudulent practices as well as an analysis of the securitization of your loan.
Your audit findings will include an examination of improper fees and relationships; fraud in the solicitation, origination, closing and servicing of your loan; the parties involved in the securitization of your loan and who actually owns your loan. There is an extremely high probability that the lender initiating the foreclosure cannot do so legally. Based on recent findings, many judges will stop the lender in its tracks if there is suspicion that the bank cooked the books.
Once you have your audit findings, you can hire an attorney to write a legal complaint for various causes of action, including wrongful foreclosure and quiet title. During the discovery process, your attorney will challenge your lender to prove it has standing to foreclose. Typically at this point, your lender will want to settle with you rather than face the prospect of the note being dismissed by the judge and you being awarded your home free and clear.
If you live in a non-judicial state, your journey is more complex and risky, but still worth the fight. You will also need to obtain an audit and file a complaint, but you will need a Temporary Restraining Order to stop the foreclosure sale. Depending on the skill of your attorney and the facts of your audit, you will be successful in obtaining a TRO. After that, you will have to obtain a Preliminary Injunction and post a bond until the trial.
Again, the discovery process is the best weapon in your mortgage war. Your lender has no choice but to disclose who actually owns your loan or it will be compelled to do so by the judge. The discovery process will also attack the steps in the foreclosure process to determine if they were done correctly. They rarely are, according to Ohio foreclosure offense/defense attorney, Dan McGookey.
If you are planning to file bankruptcy, or are already in bankruptcy, your opportunity to challenge your lender comes in the form of an “adversary proceeding.” You can also oppose your lender’s claim as a secured creditor. Both of these actions require an bankruptcy attorney experienced in predatory lending practices and securitization. Experts like Max Gardener and Lewis Landau have won these cases and understand how to launch this kind of technical battle.
When your lender comes calling for a settlement, be sure to do your homework. Your lender will look for the highest appraisals possible to justify a higher settlement. It is important for you to obtain multiple appraisals by local appraisers who understand the true market dynamics of your neighborhood and city. You will also have to provide your own realtor Broker Price Opinions to challenge the diminishing value of your home. Experts like Dennis Sasserman can provide you the model the banks use to determining the “net foreclosure value” of your home. Sasserman, who is also a bank consultant, does a thorough job of analyzing the market, the foreclosure value and the cash out value of your home. There are plenty of private lenders around who can lend you the money to buy out the bank’s note at a discount. Contact me and I will put you in touch with them. They will often provide new funding with the interest pre-paid for one year, giving you time to clean up credit problems and find conventional financing.
If you have already been foreclosed, do not give up or move out! Hire an attorney to represent you in an unlawful detainer action where these issues can be challenged and a wrongful foreclosure action can be brought about. Forget cash for keys! Save your home!
If you are, sadly, one of the sixteen million Americans already thrown out of your precious home, it is still not too late to fight your mortgage war. Have your foreclosure and eviction evaluated by an attorney immediately. The American Bar Association has changed the rules for retaining attorneys so that you can bring in an attorney for specific needs, such as a courtroom appearance or to prepare a legal document that you will file as a plaintiff in pro per.
My book, Mortgage Wars, is now available as an e-book, so there is no excuse for you not to educate yourself and become a mortgage warrior. It is only by creating a movement that we as homeowners can transform the financial services industry and ensure our children will never be victims of predatory lenders. Go to www.yourmortgagewar.com to order it.
Recent decisions by the too-big-to-fail banks to temporarily halt foreclosures is the first sign that we will win the war. But the battle is just beginning. And this battle must be fought in a court of law.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Oct
06

The Social Network Data Portability and Change

by , under NEWS
The Social Network Data Portability and Change

Just hours ago, it was announced that Facebook now allows its users to download their data from their Facebook account, putting users in control of where their data is and in the driver’s seat for where they take their data next.
A TechCrunch post by journalist Alexia Tsotsis explains the new feature: “Facebook Product Manager David Recordon explains that you can access the “Download Your Information” feature from your account settings, hit the download button and Facebook will allow you to download everything off your profile, including your friends list, events, all of your messages, wall posts and all of your photos into a zip file.”
Facebook’s latest move is a necessary step towards acknowledging user rights on social networks, exemplified by the Social Network User’s Bill of Rights drafted a few months ago at the 2010 Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference. Within this Bill of Rights, Article 7, “Data Control,” and Article 14, “Right to Withdraw,” specifically addressed the need for data portability.
Is Facebook’s latest move the result of upstart networks like Diaspora or perhaps the media effect of the searing and powerful portrayal of the company’s founder in The Social Network? Time will tell if this new feature is part of a move in the right direction for privacy on Facebook or merely an effort to improve the image of the Net’s, I mean the movie’s, anti-hero.

Follow Christina Gagnier on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/gagnier

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Case for a 20Something Moving Abroad

by , under NEWS
Case for a 20Something Moving Abroad

I graduated from college this past June and fled the country, is what I tell people I meet here in Buenos Aires.
The real story is slightly more nuanced, but when it comes down it, the statement is not untrue. The months between Northwestern’s late June graduation and my flight out of the country to Buenos Aires on September 15 were filled with hours upon hours of babysitting, supplemented with hours upon hours on LinkedIn and emailing in an attempt to secure any sort of paid writing prospects while down in Argentina. There was also the time I spent freaking out — in a good way — about my impending move and subsequent adventures, as well as in a bad way, silencing the proverbial nagging voice that arose occasionally to question what, really, did I think I was doing? Why wasn’t I just following The Plan and finding a salaried job in the U.S. with benefits? The Plan had been my plan for years, anyway.
When I think about it now (and perhaps it’s because I have spent so much time telling myself this over and over), I really did have sound reasons to hop down to the Southern Hemisphere and start a life, even a temporary life. If, as I decided at some point between junior and senior years, I really wanted to give this whole freelance/travel journalist thing a solid go it would make sense to live in a different country, and one where the cost of living is affordable at that. Additionally — and this was a big one — I had the blessing of my parents, whom I had somehow convinced this move and what I would make of it was all a good idea.
Today’s most popular scapegoat, the economy, also served as an excuse, as I watched intelligent, ambitious, done-all-the-right-things classmates struggle to find jobs for which I also would have been competing. Strength in numbers didn’t hurt either; I’m currently living in an apartment with two other Northwestern 2010 graduates who both independently came to the decision to move here. And then there’s the little network of other recent college grad expats we have developed, because once you start talking with people about where you are and what you are doing, it seems almost everyone knows of someone also living in this great city.
Perhaps we make ideal case study subjects for psychologist Jeffrey Arnett’s “emerging adulthood;” maybe we should have been interviewed for Robin Marantz Henig’s “What Is It About 20-Somethings?” in the New York Times Magazine for eschewing the traditional route and, as some might argue, putting off “real life.” (That article, like Google Voice, debuted at a highly opportune time, a couple weeks before I moved down here.) The thing is, people have been making decisions and trips like this for years. The mid-30-year-old manager at an Apple store in Miami we stopped into the day before our flight out, for example, told me his romanticized tale of being dropped off at the Obelisco in Buenos Aires with chump change and two suitcases, the start of a prosperous stint here, personally and monetarily speaking. None of these paths are objectively better or worse, I’ve come to decide, because it is all an individual decision. They’re just different.
We realize we are lucky to have — and have made — the opportunity to be living in Buenos Aires. That said, in no way are we cavorting around dropping pesos without a care. Even though I sometimes guilt myself for skipping out on a structured job my first year after graduating, I’ve realized in my first two weeks here that I still have a lot of “real life” and growing up to handle. We are all working, attempting to make our way in the world (or at least this city), in addition to adjusting to a new lifestyle, culture and language. It is all a challenge we are living for and relishing.

Follow Karina Martinez-Carter on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/KMartinezCarter

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
© Copyright All Global News on One Page 2011. All rights reserved.