Archive for October 10th, 2010

Oct
10

Arizona Gov Jan Brewer Too Sick to Complete a Second Term

by , under NEWS
Arizona Gov Jan Brewer Too Sick to Complete a Second Term

Last week, the Twitter account for John Dougherty’s Senate race sent out a tweet that Governor Jan Brewer was rumored to be seriously ill — too ill to finish a four-year term. Now you could dismiss this as “silly season” rumor-mongering, because Dougherty ran as a Democrat and Brewer is a Republican. Or because it came out first on Twitter, and not from a reputable journalistic source like the Arizona Republic. I don’t dismiss it as a rumor. I predict that it will turn out to be true. More importantly, it matters so much to the future of Arizona that voters deserve to know!
I have lived in Arizona for 40 years. During that time, there have been many instances where, because something happened to the Governor (death, impeachment, political appointment to Washington, appointment to an ambassadorship) and we wound up with an ill-equipped person as our Governor in mid stream. The last time was, well, last time — when President Obama appointed Janet Napolitano to Homeland Security, and she bailed on us, leaving the state in fiscal disarray (no blame, just observation). Governor Brewer was Secretary of State, and was elevated to Governor because Arizona doesn’t have a Lieutenant Governor.
We can’t afford to let this to happen again. The state is already known for poor governance, and the citizens are being buffeted by budget cuts while the businesses are buffeted by the immigration positions Brewer has taken.
I don’t really have a dog in this hunt, as I am a registered Independent. I am usually far away from the rumor mill. But I am very close to Twitter, and to trusted sources on Twitter.
John Dougherty isn’t a politician. He is an investigative journalist, and God knows why he even ran for office. In the 25 years I have followed his work, he has broken story after story for Village Voice Media, which is known for award-winning investigative journalism. I know those guys as well. For forty years. Dougherty has reasons to be tweeting this, I believe, that are more journalistic than political.
Why hasn’t the “lamestream media” reported this yet? Because they have to worry about future access to the politicians they cover, and they’ve got to dot every I and cross every t before they go to print. I have also heard that the story will break this week.
I am a student of new journalism: I support collaborative and citizen journalism, I read bloggers, I listen to Jay Rosen and Dave Winer’s podcast “Rebooting the News,” I heard @ryantate talking about GawkerMedia’s decision to stop worrying about “access” to sources, and now I feel willing to tell my friends where to look. I feel comfortable talking about this as a rumor, but one in which I personally believe.

Follow Francine Hardaway on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/hardaway

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Nine Months After the Quake A Million Haitians Slowly Dying

by , under NEWS
Nine Months After the Quake  A Million Haitians Slowly Dying

“If it gets any worse,” said Wilda, a homeless Haitian mother, “we’re not going to survive.” Mothers and grandmothers surrounding her nodded solemnly.
We are in a broiling “tent” with a group of women trying to raise their families in a public park. Around the back of the Haitian National Palace, the park hosts a regal statute of Alexandre Petion in its middle. It is now home to five thousand people displaced by the January 2010 earthquake.
Nine months after the quake, over a million people are still homeless in Haiti.
Haiti looks like the quake could have been last month. I visited Port au Prince shortly after the quake and much of the destruction then looks the same nine months later.
The Associated Press reports only 2 percent of the rubble has been removed and only 13,000 temporary shelters have been constructed. Not a single cent of the US aid pledged for rebuilding has arrived in Haiti. In the last few days the US pledged it would put up 10% of the billion dollars in reconstruction aid promised. Only 15 percent of the aid pledged by countries and organizations around the world has reached the country so far.
With other human rights advocates from CCR, MADRE, CUNY Law School, BAI and the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti, I am huddled under faded gray tarps stamped US Aid. Blue tarps staked into the ground as walls. This is not even the hot season but the weather reports the heat index is 115.
The floor is bare dirt, soft from a recent rain. Our guide works with a vibrant grassroots women’s organization, KOFAVIV, which is working with women in many camps, and she encourages residents to tell us their stories.
Anne has seven children. She would really love to have a tent. She and her family live on a small plot of dirt eight feet by eight feet. Sheets are tied to pieces of wood to keep out the sun. Plastic sheeting covers the ground. When it rains everything they have is soaked. She begs every day for food.
Therese has three children, 12, 11, and 9. She has lived in the camps since the quake. A few weeks ago when she went to get a bucket of water, some men grabbed her and raped her. Before the quake she worked as a street vendor but has no money to buy supplies to sell. She prays all day every day for help.
Caroline lived with her husband and three children in an apartment in downtown Port au Prince. The quake took her husband and left the rest of the family homeless. She was raped in the first camp she settled in. When she moved she was raped again and fought back with KOFAVIV. She and other women set up their own security with whistles and flashlights to protect each other. They push the police to arrest. Her life is now in danger because the rapists know who she is and she is vulnerable.
We hear from dozens of other mothers and grandmothers – Alana, Beatrice, Celine, Marcie, Rene, Wilda and others. This is what they tell us.
There is no electricity at all in the camps. Some have lights on poles that work some of the time. Many have no lights at all.
There is no food. The children are terribly hungry. The food aid program was terminated in April and nothing took its place. The authorities cut off the food so people would leave the camps, but where is there to go?
Water is hard to find. For the people in Petion park, water is delivered by truck to a central site a block or two away in the middle of several camps. Thousands of people line up twice a day to get water before it runs out. In another camp we visited Sunday, Camp Kasim, there was no water at all for hundreds of families and none scheduled to be delivered until Monday at the earliest. Boys and girls surged around a pipe several blocks away trying to capture some water in Oxfam marked buckets.
People are coughing, sniffling, and their eyes watering. Quiet babies are the norm. Many have skin rashes and vaginal infections. There are several volunteer clinics but usually only the very sickest are seen because so many people need help. The biggest camps now have some toilets but not enough. Drainage is a big problem especially now during the rainy season.
Children cannot be kept in the suffocating tents. They play in the muddy paths. They would love to return to school but there is no money.
Security is a huge problem. Less than a dozen of the thousand plus camps have official security at night. During the day the police may come around or maybe the heavily armed MINUSTAH UN forces will patrol. But at night security forces vanish. With little or no light at night, tens of thousands of unguarded sheet structures and canvas walls offer thieves and gangs an inviting target. Violence against women and girls is widespread. Women who go to the latrines at night are attacked. Some women talk of carrying rape babies. Others will do anything for the crudest abortion. When they go to the police and ask them to investigate, officers demand money for gas. Even those who pay the police usually end up frustrated. There is a sense of impunity.
There are an estimated 1300 “camps” of homeless people in Haiti. Homeless people live literally everywhere. People are camped in the middle of many streets. Shanty structures are built right up to the edge of streets. Every park, every school yard, every parking lot appear to have people living under sheets or lean to tents.
The most fortunate families live in modest plastic tents. The newest tents are royal blue with red flags with yellow stars on them – donated in the last week from China. Less fortunate families, and there are many of them, live under faded sheets stretched between wooden poles made from tree branches. Within the camps there are dirt paths – some only inches wide. Tents and sheet shelters are side by side – inches apart.
Evictions are starting. Churches are pushing people off their property. Schools which are reopening are turning off the water to the people camped in the ball fields. Some in authority are openly saying that people must be forced out the camps. But only 13,000 temporary structures have been built and they are far away from family, school, jobs and healthcare. There is no place to go.
The UN, which effectively runs Haiti with the Haitians and the US, holds meetings nearly every day to coordinate responses to dozens of issues like security, food, water, reconstruction, and gender violence. Human rights advocates in Port au Prince complain that no meetings are conducted in Kreyol, the language of the Haitian people.
Yet there is hope. The Haitian mothers and grandmothers we heard from are fighting for their lives. KOFAVIV and BAI and other grassroots human rights groups are speaking out, demonstrating, educating the people in the camps, and working together for social justice.
During a torrential downpour Saturday, dozens gathered on folding chairs under the front porch overhang of BAI to work on how to get the US, the UN, Haiti and the NGOs to do their jobs.
Together the people have a chance. As one woman who works against violence told us, “If there is one woman and one man, maybe the man will win. But if the woman uses whistles to alert other women and gets other women to show up, maybe the man will see he is going to lose and will run away.”
Meanwhile, Wilda and a million other Haitians are slowly dying from starvation, illness, lack of security and neglect. Nine months after the quake.
By Bill Quigley. Bill is Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a professor at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. He has worked in Haiti for years with Bureau des Avocats Internationaux and the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti. He wrote this article from Port au Prince with help from Laura Raymond and Sunita Patel. You can contact Bill at Quigley77@gmail.com

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Reading the Pictures And the Tea Partys Been Calling Obama a Nazi

by , under NEWS
Reading the Pictures And the Tea Partys Been Calling Obama a Nazi

Iott 3rd from left in both photos
Barely having had time to stash Christine’s broomstick, the GOP has now got another Tea Party skeleton to bury somehow. It turns out Mr. Iott, or “Reinhard Pferdmann” (his “German alter ego”), has been an avid member of a group that dresses up like Nazis and acts out the exploits of a particular SS Panzer division.
You have to read the Atlantic article (Why is This GOP House Candidate Dressed as a Nazi?). It’s a classic. …It was a father-son bonding thing, but he stopped because the son got bored!?!
I could talk about the wallpaper in the first shot, or about the guy in the kilt and knee socks. In the second shot, I could point out that the guys don’t seem nearly as happy, the tall guy looking downright depressed. Still though, what better example of the clueless and shameless candidates from the far-right this election cycle than Mr. Iott in uniform, the candidate — even after two passes explaining himself — apparently not having any sense that there’s something wrong.
I’m not sure how GOP headquarters goes about undoing this one, but I’m fairly certain about one thing. I doubt we’ll see any commercials with Herr Iott claiming, “I’m you.”
———-
For a breakdown of the latest visual spin plus the best in photojournalism, visit BagNewsNotes (and follow our Twitter feed here).

Follow Michael Shaw on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/bagnewsnotes

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

US Republican candidate Rich Iott in Nazi uniform row

by , under NEWS
US Republican candidate Rich Iott in Nazi uniform row

A Republican politician in the US has been criticised after pictures of him dressed in a Nazi uniform emerged on the internet.
Senior Republican figures have now sought to distance themselves from Rich Iott, a House candidate from Ohio.
Mr Iott admitted being a member of a group that re-enacted SS battles.
But he said he had been involved in re-enacting from many different eras and did not mean “any disrespect to anyone” in the US military.
Several photographs show Mr Iott posing as an officer in the Waffen SS – the combat wing of Hitler's feared Schutzstaffel.
The pictures first appeared on the website of Wiking, a re-enactment group based in America's mid-west.
Mr Iott, who uses the character name Reinhard Pferdmann, has admitted being a member of Wiking, saying it was a “purely historical interest”.
And in a statement on his website, Mr Iott said: “Never, in any of my re-enacting of military history, have I meant any disrespect to anyone who served in our military or anyone who has been affected by the tragedy of war, especially the Jewish community.
“Historical re-enacting is a hobby enjoyed by millions of men – and women – around the world. I have been involved in historical re-enacting from many different eras since I was in college.”
Mr Iott also posted several photographs which showed him dressed in a US World War I uniform and also in a Union uniform during a Civil War re-enactment.
Despite this, the situation is now making some in the Republican Party uncomfortable, the BBC's Ian Mackenzie in Washington says.
On Sunday, Republican whip Eric Cantor said he repudiated Mr Iott's actions.
“I do not support anything like this,” he told Fox News on Sunday.
The Iott controversy comes amid growing concern in the Republican party about the views of some candidates for the mid-term elections in November, our correspondent says.
He adds that the growth of the ultra-conservative Tea Party movement has left them with one would-be senator who has questioned the civil rights legislation in the 1960s, while another confessed to dabbling in witchcraft and suggested scientists were implanting full human brains into mice.

Source:BBC

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

14 Things We Learned From Romantic Comedies

by , under NEWS
14 Things We Learned From Romantic Comedies

You may think the only thing you’ve absorbed from romantic comedies is that Matthew McConaughey has never worn a shirt, but if you probe the inner sanctums of your mind you’ll probably find many life lessons you learned from these films. Here are our 14 favorite teachings from the world of romcoms. For more from The Frenemy, go here! – Alida Nugent
One
1 of 15
17 Things Every Women’s Magazine Will Tell You (That You Should Ignore)
What If Musicians Kept Their Real Names? (PICTURES)
The Worst Instances Of Self-Promotion Ever (PHOTOS)
The Weirdest (And Most Adorable) Halloween Costumes For Kids! (PHOTOS)
Unintentional Hipsters (PHOTOS)
The Most Unnecessary TV Remakes Of All Time (PHOTOS)
If you ever go to the hair salon, you will have hilariously mis-dyed hair and a flamboyant hair dresser who wears a black turtleneck. You will leave wearing a very comical hat or bandanna. Going to the hair salon is scary! Or maybe its just scary HOW FUNNY IT CAN BE.
comments(63)
<>
Total comments: 63 | Post a Comment
Rate This Cliche
Rank #2 | Average: 8.6
Sort of true
RIGHT ON!
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Current Top 5 Romantic Comedy Cliches
loading…
Choose your Top 5 Romantic Comedy Cliches
UserName
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Top User Slides
<>
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Users who voted on this slide
<>
loading…

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Arianna Finds Common Ground With Mike Huckabee On Fox News VIDEO

by , under NEWS
Arianna Finds Common Ground With Mike Huckabee On Fox News VIDEO

Arianna visited Mike Huckabee’s eponymous show this weekend, finding plenty of common ground with the Fox News host and former Republican governor from Arkansas.
“Basically we went from a country that made things to a country that made things up: CDOs, credit default swaps, toxic derivatives,” said Arianna. “Wall Street became a casino. And we the taxpayers bailed them out. That’s where you and I agree.”
The pair also agreed on the problems with Fannie and Freddie, the need to improve America’s crumbling infrastructure, and even shared some quips about their accents.
WATCH:
Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Why Democrats Should Not Join in Economic Scapegoating

by , under NEWS
Why Democrats Should Not Join in Economic Scapegoating

Deep economic crises are fodder for demagogues who channel economic fear into a politics of resentment against “them.” In the 1930s it was foreign traders (mainly Europeans), immigrants, and Jews. Now it’s foreign traders (mainly the Chinese), immigrants, and Muslims.
Why do you suppose a half-dozen states are now considering (or have recently enacted) measures to end multicultural studies, bar children of undocumented workers from public schools, and allowed racial profiling? Every survey shows fewer undocumented workers in America now than three years ago.
How do you account for the outbreak of Islamaphobia — fully nine years after 9/11? Why the clamor over a Muslim center near Ground Zero? Why do 18 percent of Americans believe President Obama wasn’t born in the United States, that he is a secret Muslim?
How do you explain the surging animosity toward foreign trade, particularly toward China? Candidates for midterm elections are running tens of millions of dollars of ads attacking their opponents for being too sympathetic to China.
Republicans have a long history of turning fears into resentments that animate voters. (Remember Willy Horton? Senator Joe McCarthy?) For years, Fox News, yell radio, and other outlets of the Republican right have built followings on hatefulness.
Now that the Great Jobs Recession continues, they have more fertile ground. Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and Newt Gingrich are given megaphones by Fox News to bash immigrants and Muslims and to question the President’s patriotism.
Yet Democrats are entering the same terrain when they blame China. According to the New York Times, House speaker Nancy Pelosi has been encouraging Democratic candidates to go after China, after internal polls showed voters increasingly willing to blame China for our problems and strongly in favor of eliminating tax breaks for companies that do business in China.
Democrats must know high unemployment in America has little or nothing to do with China. Yes, China should allow the yuan to rise further against the dollar. But China’s under-valued currency isn’t the reason we’ve lost 15 million jobs since the end of 2007. No, the tax code shouldn’t reward companies for relocating jobs there. But this tax break is barely relevant to the situation we’re in.
Our jobs crisis is due to the collapse of demand in the U.S. after the housing bubble burst. No longer able to borrow against the rising value of their homes, the vast American middle and working class can no longer spend enough to keep the economy going.
If Democrats (or Republicans, for that matter) want to blame something, blame America’s record level of inequality – an almost unprecedented concentration of income and wealth at the top, and a smaller proportion for the vast middle.
The evidence is all around us. It’s no mere coincidence that 1928 and 2007 marked historical high-water points for shares of national income going to the top 1 percent. Today’s median wage is now 5 percent lower than it was at the start of the decade, taking inflation into account, while top earners are doing better than ever. The core assets of most Americans are their homes, whose values are now 20 to 40 percent below what they were three years ago, while the key assets of America’s wealthy are shares of stocks and bonds, whose values have declined far less. The official rate of unemployment is 4.4 percent for college graduates but 10 percent for those with only high school degrees and almost 15 percent for high school dropouts.
I’m not suggesting Democrats blame the rich for their success. Most came by their high earnings and wealth honestly. And surely a vibrant economy requires that entrepreneurs be rewarded for hard work and valuable insight.
But Democrats should admit America’s economic structure has become dangerously unbalanced — more unbalanced than it’s been in 80 years — and the imbalance is making it difficult if not impossible for the nation to emerge from recession. For these reasons, Democrats should recommit themselves and the nation to redresssing that balance.
Are the Democrats so dependent on the campaign contributions from the wealthy they dare not speak of this? Or worried about being labeled “class warriors?” by the right? Or convinced by their pollsters that everyone in the vast middle assumes they’ll be rich some day and therefore can’t abide the truth?
Or convinced that bashing China is so much more effective?
China bashing doesn’t educate the public about what’s truly at stake and what must be done in the years ahead. Worse: It reinforces the politics of resentment, and further legitimizes other forms of isolationism and xenophobia.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Tablets Apps Mobile Ethics and Training Grip 17th World Editors Forum

by , under NEWS
Tablets Apps Mobile Ethics and Training Grip 17th World Editors Forum

Game changers for journalists in this year of the tablet and mobile are dizzying but certain basics are constant, so one has to re-tool, and fast, to stay afloat, media experts proclaimed this week.
“We need one developer per five journalists today,” suggested Juan Senor, partner in the Innovation Media Consulting Group http://www.innovation-mediaconsulting.com at the 17th World Editors Forum (WEF) http://www.wefhamburg2010.com/articles.php?id=114#.
Senor, who launched the “Innovations in Newspapers 2010 World Report,” said newsrooms should be in a permanent state of beta in the next five years and that all mobile devices would morph in one year, so editors should divide content creation from content elaboration.
“The editorial functions of newspapers will be with us for a long time, but the distribution system as we know it is short-lived, at least in our part of the world,” said Roger Gafke, professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism and director of development at its Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute http://www.rjionline.org/about/stories/staff-and-advisers/staff/roger-gafke.php.
Roger Gafke (Abu-Fadil)
Gafke’s views were echoed by many of the over 600 editors-in-chief attending the WEF conference in Hamburg, Germany, dubbed “The Tablet Year: Why Mobile Distribution Will Change the News Business.”
Participants agreed that good management of newspapers required flexibility, a willingness to change, a reallocation of resources to meet fast-paced technological innovations, and, constant training to keep up with the times.
It’s been a hard pill to swallow for print media, what with dropping circulations, staff layoffs, consolidated operations, rising paper costs, transformative technology, citizen journalism, blogging, and uncertain economic times.
World newspaper publishing trends (Abu-Fadil)
“We’re underestimating the impact of the mobile trends,” cautioned Philipp Schindler, Google’s VP for Northern & Central Europe. “This will be bigger than you’ve ever imagined.”
For Chris Ahearn, Thomson Reuters’ http://thomsonreuters.com president of media, the explosion of tablets and mobile devices is an incentive to become creative as news providers.
Tablet workflow (Abu-Fadil)
“We live in a publishing world that’s so dramatically different. The old business model is dead, it’s kaput. We have to move faster, we have to move more boldly,” he said, adding that original news reporting would emerge as a result.
WEF guests admire German daily Hamburger Abendblatt’s adoption of iPad (Abu-Fadil)
“The media arts, and journalism, are fundamentally about storytelling,” Janet Robinson, the New York Times’ www.nytimes.com president and CEO said in a keynote speech. “It’s about creating an essential human connection.”
Robinson said her paper was placing greater emphasis on the readers’ identity, adding that Facebook worked well because it’s rooted in identity and that the Times had assigned a very experienced journalist to be editor of social media.
“No one can predict the future with precision but we can examine trends. People will always need and want to be told a story,” she said.
But telling a story can also result in jail, or worse, as in the case with Ahmad Zeid-Abadi, recipient of the 2010 WAN_IFRA Golden Pen of Freedom.
WAN_IFRA is the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers http://www.wan-ifra.org, WEF’s umbrella organization.
WEF president Xavier Vidal-Folch presented the award to Zeid-Abadi, an Iranian journalist sentenced in 2009 to six years in prison and banned for life from practicing his profession.
The award was received on his behalf by dissident Iranian journalist Akbar Ganji, a leading investigative journalist and 2006 Golden Pen Laureate.
Akbar Ganji receives Golden Pen award from Xavier Vidal-Folch on behalf
of jailed Iranian journalist Ahmad Zeid-Abadi (Abu-Fadil)
“Currently, we don’t have any independent media in Iran,” Ganji told conferees, noting that the media don’t express realities of Iranian society.
To survive, journalists must toe the government line, or else face dire consequences, he said.
But cheerleading for officials can also result in major embarrassments, as when Egypt’s government-run paper Al Ahram photoshopped a picture of President Hosni Mubarak http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/16/egyptian-newspaper-alters_n_719504.html to show him walking ahead of President Barrack Obama at the White House.
“What happened happens in all newspapers,” Al Ahram http://www.ahram.org.eg CEO Abdel Moneim Said said lamely in defense of the doctored photo that he labeled an artistic illustration of a story on Middle East peace talks entitled “The Road to Sharm El Skeikh.”
Abdel Moneim Said, center, tries to justify doctored picture in Al Ahram (Abu-Fadil)
Said, who was pressed by Vidal-Kolch on quality journalism and the ethics of publishing a misleading photo, tried to justify his paper’s “montage” by saying it was part of a special report, but conference participants were unconvinced.
Not to be overlooked is the need for constant training, insisted the Poynter Institute’s www.poynter.org Howard Finberg.
“It’s absolutely essential that training be part of the equation. How do we achieve our goals if we do not train the people?” he asked.
Finberg said Poynter wanted to encourage a culture of individual learning and raise the standards and awareness of journalism. “If you don’t have a (training) program in your organization, I’m going to advocate that you do something.”
So how is the new information ecosystem shaping up?
WEF has been active in promoting greater awareness of changes affecting news organizations.
Its “Trends in Newsroom 2010: Innovative Ideas for Newspapers in the Digital Age” is an invaluable resource for editors and publishers.
The 160-page guide examines newspapers in crisis, mobile devices and their impact, how to manage integrated newsrooms, niche, hyperlocal and customized news, entrepreneurial journalism and top mobile apps.
WAN-IFRA’s “2010 World Press Trends” provides global summaries of circulations and detailed statistical country reports.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

The Best Generic Speech Ever

by , under NEWS
The Best Generic Speech Ever

Thank you ladies, gentlemen and prospective donors, remote viewing audiences, readers, tweeters, and other platform attendees for joining me standing, sitting, lying here as your candidate for elected office, civic duty, greased chute to Swellsville. It is with extreme, reserved, dubious pride that I accept your mandate, challenge, double dog dare, and I hereby promise, guarantee, secretly doubt that I will represent you to the best of my ability and everything in my heart and soul and man purse.
I’m sure you want to know what I stand for and so do I. And I will reveal my positions just as soon as you let me know what’s important to you. What springs, leaps, staggers exhaustedly to mind: god, flag, family, kittens, rainbows. I’m for all things good and opposed to everything that’s bad, ladies and gentlemen and heavy contributors. And you can count on me to stay that way as long as you return me to office, or until a better offer in the private sector rolls around, hopefully soon.
In the future, right now, previously, we simply can’t afford my opponent’s onerous tax schemes, reckless social security reform, callow inexperience, life- long record as a career politician. Let me assure you that I believe in his/ her/ their right to say bad things about this country, city, state. I just don’t happen to agree with him, her, whatever.
If circumstances, poll numbers, my extortion trial verdict, were different and he/ she/ they weren’t advocating we push old people, children, veterans, into the path of a steaming locomotive, 18 wheeler, cheese blintz, I would be the first, seventy- third, last one to defend their right to say whatever irresponsible things he/ she/ they believed in, didn’t believe in or heard from a unicorn was true, because in this great country, city, state, ladies and gentlemen and 527 administrators, everyone is entitled to their own opinion no matter how foolish or downright treasonous it may be or see or dee.
It’s a little thing called free speech. A huge, trivial, debatable tenet that makes this country, city, state, total kick- ass, better than every other place, nothing to sneeze at. Sometimes, however, albeit, ergo, free speech can lead to disorder, duplicity, lawsuits. We all know people who would be better off keeping their big mouths shut, zipped, clamped. You know it and I know it and I’m sure our Founding Fathers knew it too and three and fore. Fore Fathers. Five Fathers. Five Mothers. Hello.
And my opponent is one of those who needs his/ her/ their lips sewed closed, ladies and gentlemen and focus group participants, with their baseless accusations, frivolous charges, grand jury testimony. Because the way things are today, tomorrow and yesterday, in good conscience I just can’t stand here and there and everywhere and let this continue, persist, carry on my wayward son.
The stakes are too high. The times too important. The truth too vital and expedient and slippery and not something you can just waltz around and pretend its not there like a homeless person. As Ronald Reagan, JFK, Bossa Nova once said, “facts are stubborn things.” And you know what else is stubborn ladies, gentlemen and corporate lobbyists? You are. As am I, and I’m hoping, begging, worried you will, will not, go to the polls on November 1st, 2nd and 3rd. And do do that voodoo that you do so well, not so well, wellish. Thank you for your support, donation, disdain.
Will Durst is a San Francisco based political columnist who often tells jokes. On stage.
Catch him October 11, 18, 25, and November 1 at the Rrazz Room. 222 Mason St San Francisco 94102. therrazzroom.com. 415.394.1189.
In Oconomowoc, Wisconsin at the Arts Center on Oct 23.
142 Throckmorton on Oct 24. And Rancho Nicasio on Oct 31.
His new CD, “Raging Moderate,” now available from Stand Up! Records on iTunes and Amazon.
Coming next year: “Where the Rogue Things Go!”

Follow Will Durst on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/willdurst

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Tyler Clementis Death College Newspapers React

by , under NEWS
Tyler Clementis Death College Newspapers React

Several weeks after Rutgers University student Tyler Clementi’s tragic suicide, people are still debating the takeaway from the terrible story. College students around the country are writing about Clementi in their campus newspapers, expressing their takes on the lessons their campuses should learn. Rutgers’ own Daily Targum chimed in this week with a controversial editorial that essentially blamed the media for making too much of the Clementi story instead of letting the campus mourn him in a more private fashion. The editors write:
The editors believe that it’s better to “mourn for Clementi, and just for him, rather than using him as a martyr for a cause that has yet to be proven.” But Towleroad’s Andrew Belonsky maintains that “activists and media would have acted irresponsibly had we let Clementi’s death be turned into a footnote, rather than a rally for change.”
Moving beyond just the opinion of this one op-ed, campuses around the country are debating how Clementi’s story affects their communities. Here, a sampling:
Get rid of “homophobic laws”: “These teenagers are not merely victims of a few bullies from their school but victims of a political environment polluted by hazardous, hateful, and homophobic rhetoric,” says Ryan M. Rossner in the Harvard Crimson. We need a broad, sweeping change because “homophobic laws and lack of proper legal protections send a message to the bullies and bullied of America that being gay is still not ok.” Creating a “more tolerant and welcoming climate for all students” would be true “climate change.”
Don’t blame the internet for Clementi’s death: “It’s time for ‘Generation Me’ to take some responsibility,” says an editorial in the Arizona Daily Wildcat. These “bullycide” stories reflect that “we let ourselves get jaded and bored, and meanness crept in to take the place of passion and interest.” Let’s remember that even in an age of BlackBerries, “If you hurt someone with your words or actions, intentionally or otherwise, it’s on you.”
We can prevent the next tragedy: We must accept that “there are daily acts of hate, bias and discrimination in lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer and transgender communities that go unnoticed or unreported,” says Terri Phoenix in the University of North Carolina Daily Tar Heel. It’s time to “commit to end this bigotry, shame, and harassment.” This way, Clementi’s death will pave the way for “more just, inclusive, welcoming and equitable campuses, communities and world.”

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Never Again Ten Great Holocaust Films You May Have Missed

by , under NEWS
Never Again Ten Great Holocaust Films You May Have Missed

As the most barbaric event of the twentieth century, the Nazis’ mass extermination of Jews during World War 2 has served as the basis of countless books, plays, and films over the past sixty years.
No surprise there, since we humans have always drawn our most powerful, memorable stories from the most tragic events of our time. In great tragedy lies great drama, of course- but also a cautionary truth about ourselves and what we’re capable of when the ugly forces of hate and ignorance take over.
The more recent examples of genocide and “ethnic cleansing” around the globe prove that the dark forces which fueled the Holocaust can return, just decades after our forebears first saw the ghastly footage from the concentration camps, and cried out with one voice, “Never again”.
This disturbing fact only suggests that periodically we all should revisit the best books and films on the Holocaust, however unpleasant, to keep our own awareness, watchfulness, and revulsion very much alive.
Again, there is no shortage of worthy choices. In the realm of film, many Holocaust- themed films are justly famous. In the documentary sphere, noone who seriously wants to understand what happened can pass up two such films, done from opposing sides, and over a half century apart: Leni Riefenstahl’s “Triumph Of The Will” (1935), a brilliant and unnerving piece of propaganda that made a nation fall in love with a monster; and “The Sorrow and the Pity” (1970), Marcel Ophuls’s exhaustive work of genius about conditions in his native France during the Nazi occupation.
On the narrative side, Steven Spielberg’s haunting “Schindler’s List” (1993) is likely the most widely viewed film about the Holocaust, and among the director’s finest work. Other enduring classics, like “The Diary of Anne Frank (1959), “Sophie’s Choice” (1982), and more recently, “The Pianist” (2001), evoke the period (and/or its aftermath) on a more intimate, personal level, but to equally devastating effect.
Yet there’s even more top-notch work, produced mostly in Europe since the war, that has not gained such a broad audience. What follows are ten particularly distinguished examples:
The Murderers Are Among Us (1948)- After she’s released from a Nazi concentration camp, Susanne Wallner (Hildegarde Knef) returns to her apartment to find it occupied by a former officer and surgeon, Hans Martens (Ernst Wilhelm Borchert), tormented by his complicity in the Holocaust. Susanne offers to share her flat until Martens can find other accommodations, but finds herself drawn to the anguished, self-destructive young man. Made in crumbling, bomb-scarred East Berlin in 1946, “Murderers” is not only Germany’s first postwar production, but a haunting film of disillusionment and atonement. The film’s stark power comes from the unlikely bond that develops between Susanne, a camp survivor who craves normalcy, and hard-drinking, guilt-ridden Hans, who cannot return to his practice because he no longer believes humanity is worth the effort of sparing. Filmed in an expressionistic style, “Murderers” powerfully dramatizes the rebirth of hope amid literal ruins, human and otherwise.
Naked Among Wolves (1963)- In 1945, as the Allies approach Buchenwald, a 4-year-old Polish boy is smuggled via suitcase into the infamous concentration camp, where he is hidden by camp leader Walter Kraemer (Erwin Geschonneck) at the behest of fellow inmate Hofel (Armin Mueller-Stahl), who knows the SS will shoot him on sight. Moved by the child’s innocence, the prisoners secret him from one hiding spot to another, but it’s only a matter of time before the Nazis are alerted to his presence, forcing the men to an uncertain fate. Based on a true story and presaging such Holocaust dramas as “Schindler’s List,” Frank Beyer’s “Wolves” concerns the real-life efforts of dozens of concentration-camp inmates to hide an orphan from their Nazi captors. An influential and important film produced in East Germany with little-known actors (only Mueller-Stahl’s career would continue in Europe), “Wolves” speaks to the will to survive terrible atrocity and highlights the bravery of ordinary men who find themselves in an extreme situation. The final riot scene is a cathartic climax to a compelling film.
The Pawnbroker (1964)- Haunted by his experiences in a Nazi concentration camp, which his wife and family did not survive, Jewish pawnbroker Sol Nazerman (Rod Steiger) is an emotional fortress impervious to the world around him. With no faith in God or humankind, Nazerman becomes increasingly bitter and callous on the anniversary of his wife’s death, even to those, like shop clerk Jesus Ortiz (Jaime Sanchez) and Harlem social worker Marilyn Birchfield (Geraldine Fitzgerald)-a Holocaust survivor herself-who offer him friendship. Are his wounds too deep to heal? One of the few films to deal head-on with the psychological havoc wreaked on survivors of the Nazi extermination camps, Sidney Lumet’s “Pawnbroker” is a bleak, hard-hitting story about imprisonment, both literal and metaphorical. Steiger, in a virtuoso performance, portrays a man so scarred by his witnessing of atrocities that he’s become a paragon of emotional cruelty, quietly stewing in his hate and pain. Lumet wrings tension from Sol’s jarring, sudden flashbacks as well as the urban setting, drawing sharp parallels between New York City’s ghetto milieu and the wartime camps. With a somber jazz score by Quincy Jones, “Pawnbroker” is a gritty tale of unlucky survival.
The Shop On Main Street (1965)- During the Nazi occupation of Czechoslovakia, Antonin (Jozef Kroner), an ineffectual worker whose brother-in-law is the town’s chief Nazi collaborator, gets assigned to be “Aryan owner” of a button shop long operated by Rozalie Lautman (Ida Kaminska) an old, increasingly senile Jewish lady. Antonin can’t make the still-spirited, energetic Rozalie understand she now works for him; she sees him as her new assistant, oblivious to the horror looming just outside her shop. When the Germans start taking the town’s Jews to the camps, Antonin must resolve whether to turn Rozalie in, or risk his life by hiding her. A deserving winner of the Best Foreign Film Oscar in 1966, “Shop” is a haunting tale of the holocaust. Directed by Jan Kadar and Elmar Klos with simplicity and restraint, the heart-rending story unfolds gradually, with a pitch-perfect rendering of the two central characters (by Kroner and Kaminska) keeping us glued to the screen. Released by the Criterion Collection, this unforgettable testament to the horrific ravages of the Second War should not be missed.
The Garden Of The Finzi-Continis (1970)- Attempting to preserve their idyllic way of life while Mussolini stirs up anti-Semitic hatred outside, the aristocratic Jewish Finzi-Contini family spend their days picnicking with friends, playing parlor games, and romping on Eden-like tennis courts. Middle-class Jew Giorgio (Lino Capolicchio), a regular guest, is deeply in love with childhood sweetheart, Micol (Dominique Sanda), but she turns from him to pursue his more sexually aggressive friend, Malnate (Fabio Testi). As war rolls closer to home, the Finzi-Continis’ days of heaven are increasingly numbered. Vittorio de Sica’s gorgeous, elegiac film is a solemn meditation on loss of innocence set during one of the most turbulent eras in world history. The Finzi-Continis believe their privilege will protect them from fascist oppression, but their willed isolation and passivity only makes their eventual downfall that much more tragic. Certain images- Giorgio and Micol’s ill-fated romantic tryst in a buggy, the slow-motion halcyon portraits of each family member that closes the film- really stick with you. A poetic, lyrical masterwork by the great Neorealist director.
The Boat Is Full (1981)- After their train is halted near the Swiss border, a handful of German Jewish nationals sprint for the border amid a hail of Nazi bullets, rather than face death. Once across, they take shelter at an inn run by Franz and Anna Flueckiger (Mathias Gnadinger and Renate Steiger), who are at first reluctant to house these haggard refugees. When the Swiss authorities come to investigate, their only hope for asylum is to pretend they’re a family, which requires Judith Krueger (Tina Engel) to pose as the wife of Karl Schneider (Gerd David), an AWOL Nazi. During World War II, famously neutral Switzerland closed its borders to the incoming waves of people attempting to escape Hitler’s Third Reich, sending back those who did not meet its strict new definition of political refugees. Markus Imhoof’s forlorn, Oscar-nominated film, based in part on a work of history by Alfred A. Hasler, depicts this little-known facet of the Holocaust years in wrenching psychological detail. Imhoof draws strong performances from his entire cast, telling a tragic story of desperation, camaraderie, and bureaucratic cruelty. An undiscovered gem.
Shoah (1985)- This landmark film, eleven years in the making, is a first-person testimonial about the horrors of the Holocaust, the banality of evil, and the Third Reich’s meticulous planning of mass extinction in Europe. Traveling the globe, director Claude Lanzmann speaks with camp survivors, former SS troopers, and other eyewitnesses to Hitler’s genocidal program, many of whom speak reluctantly but bluntly about their experiences. Among Holocaust documentaries, Lanzmann’s “Shoah” is the most accomplished and legendary, brimming with raw social-historical insight and absolutely chilling personal detail. Based entirely on interviews, the film offers an unprecedented oral history of Europe in the 1930s and ’40s without dry voiceovers and gliding shots of still photos: the survivors Lanzmann speaks to are brutally frank, the questions he poses almost unthinkably intimate, yet exactly the ones we want to know the answers to. You shouldn’t see this because it’s an “important” film, though it is–see it because, assuming you invest the time (nearly ten hours) and attention, it’s one of the greatest film experiences you’ll ever have.
Good Evening, Mr. Wallenberg (1990)- As the coldly devastating consequences of Hitler’s Final Solution roil the streets and ghettoes of Budapest in 1944, mild-mannered businessman Raoul Wallenberg (Stellan Skarsgard) strives valiantly to protect Hungarian Jews from death at the hands of the Nazis. Upper class and seemingly above suspicion, Wallenberg generates false documents to help evacuate the innocent to safe houses. But as the war draws to a close, it seems Wallenberg’s heroism might be his undoing. Before “Schindler’s List” came Kjell Grede’s engrossing portrait of a man who risked everything to protect others from ignominious slaughter. In the end, he saved thousands, but was himself accorded a different fate. Skarsgard portrays this little-known hero with dignity and gravitas, while Katharina Thalbach delivers a memorable performance as one of the haunted souls he protects: Marja, a witness to the slaughter of her own children. Grede does not shy from depicting Nazi abominations, and the air of suspense he builds around the discovery of a group of survivors, and the march of the Russian army on Budapest, is unnerving. “Wallenberg” is an unblinking tribute to a remarkable man of action.
Fateless (2005)- Corralled with other Hungarian Jews onto a train to Auschwitz in 1944, 14-year-old Gyorgy Koves (Marcell Nagy) endures deprivation and harsh treatment at the hands of his Nazi captors, who move him to a hellish work camp where even some of his fellow Jews look down on him for not speaking Yiddish. After months of misery and near-starvation, he survives the liberation, only to experience a ghostly, dreamlike homecoming in war-scarred Budapest. Based on the autobiographical novel by Nobel Prize winner Imre Kertezs, Lajos Koltai’s coming-of-age drama “Fateless” examines the Holocaust through the eyes of a child who of necessity grows up fast, trying all the while to make the best of the worst situation. Graced with a swelling score by Ennio Morricone, a haunting performance by Nagy, and impressionistic visuals (Koltai is a veteran lensman), “Fateless” is a richly powerful, stubbornly unsentimental meditation on Jewish identity.
The Counterfeiters (2007)- Recruited for a top-secret operation by his Nazi captors, Russian-born Jew Solomon Sorowitsch (Karl Markovics), an artist and expert forger before the war, is shipped off to the Mauthausen camp, where he works with a special team of Jewish counterfeiters that includes left-leaning perfectionist Adolf Burger (August Diehl). The men enjoy privileges and escape death by assisting the Reich’s scheme to destabilize Allied economies, but as the war grinds on, have to confront the impact of their actions. Based on a book by the real-life Adolf Burger, Ruzowitsky’s tense, tightly coiled drama features an exemplary cast, including Markovics, Diehl, and Devid Striesow as the commandant-turned-SS leader who first nabs Sorowitsch in Berlin. What’s most compelling about this Holocaust drama is watching the moral evolution of Markovics’s character, a shrewd con man accustomed to the good things in life, even in prison. Nominated for the Best Foreign Film Oscar, “The Counterfeiters” deals with an old theme in war films–the art of self-preservation versus the agony of bad conscience.
Note: several more films relating to the Holocaust are slated for our site and highly recommended, including “The Last Stage” (1948), “Border Street” (1948), “Kapo” (1959), and “Europa, Europa” (1990).
For over 2,100 outstanding titles on DVD, visit www.bestmoviesbyfarr.com
To see John’s videos for WNET/Channel 13, go to www.reel13.org

Follow John Farr on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/jfarr02

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Solomon Burke My Guardian Angel

by , under NEWS
Solomon Burke My Guardian Angel

My father told me Solomon Burke stories when I was a kid. He was Solomon’s agent in the ’60s when he was at the William Morris Agency. Years later, I met Solomon as an adult. I was an A&R exec at Shout! Factory and I had the honor of overseeing three albums – Make Do With What You Got, Nashville, and Like a Fire.
Solomon quickly became very much a father to me (as if he needed more children; he had 21 of his own). And like a good father, he was there at nearly every crossroads of my life. Solomon was there to mourn the suicide of my mother. Solomon was there at the hospital when my 3-year old daughter (his “princess” he called her) had open-heart surgery. And Solomon was there in Nashville when my marriage was on the verge of falling apart. Without telling me, he flew my wife to Nashville, put her in the front row of his show, then brought me onstage to perform with him. In that one night, he saved my marriage.
Solomon gave me unconditional love before I even knew the meaning of the words. He had a huge body which finally couldn’t stand him up as his plane landed this morning in Amsterdam. But his voice was bigger and his heart overshadowed them both.
I love you, dear Solomon. Thank you for that big heart. I don’t who’s gonna protect my ass with you gone.

Follow Shawn Amos on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/PopNewsWire

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Donald Trumps Hair and the Presidency

by , under NEWS
Donald Trumps Hair and the Presidency

Rumors flew this week that Donald Trump is possibly planning a run for the highest office. Fed up with perceived inefficiency and ineffectiveness in the Oval Office, Trump thinks he might be the best man for the job. No sooner than the reports surfaced did columnists begin to poke fun at The Donald’s famous head of hair. Since it’s long held that Americans vote at least partially with their eyes – and demand a head of hair that represents their commander in chief well – these critics have some ground to stand on. But, The Daily Telegraph’s Nigel Farndale warns that in this case it could serve as a distraction:
Farndale may be on to something. Last month, I attended an event where Trump served on a panel discussing the new season of The Apprentice. Before the panel was invited to the stage, the host Paley Center for Media screened portions of the first episode from the new season. Trump, his daughter Ivanka, son Donald Jr., and producer Mark Burnett took seats in the front row, leaving Trump seated directly in front of me in the stadium seating. For the half-hour screening, I found myself staring at Trump’s hair.
After careful inspection, I can safely say that Trump’s hair is real. Once that controversy had been settled for me, and the panelists took the stage, I was able to focus more on what they had to say about the new season and the show. This season focuses on out-of-work individuals who are looking for a second chance during tough economic times. Trump seemed sincere while discussing the opportunities that he’s trying to create for those who have fallen on hard times – he’s even brought in well-known CEOs from outside companies to help advise contestants as they look toward a post-Apprentice future. Through the help of these connections, Trump is trying to better others’ lives. During an election season when everyone is saying Americans are voting squarely on jobs and nothing else, Trump is sending the right message.
But this program alone isn’t enough to make Trump presidential. Throughout the panel, Trump highlighted Frank A. Bennack, Jr., chief executive of Hearst Corporation, and his wife in the front row for their hard work and dedication to the media industry. When Trump made these gestures, it had the feel of a candidate rising up and giving honor to his supporters.
Trump may not be the right fit for Washington, yet his decades of real estate experience have served him well. He shows the makings of someone who knows what it takes to get noticed and talked about.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

A WAY FORWARD

by , under NEWS
A WAY FORWARD

I’m going to say something that may surprise some of you. This country is in jeopardy because of the tea party’s failure as a grass roots movement.
Before you stop reading, give me a moment to explain. A number of sources have discussed how upset a majority of Americans are–not just right wingers–and over very, very valid concerns.
The list is long, obvious, and definitely not the topics that most of the candidates are talking about, despite this feverish election season.
What kind of issues? Try, at the top of the list, a fear that America is losing, is falling behind.
Joe Klein, a Time reporter and best selling author, just came back from a nationwide listening tour, and found that his countrymen weren’t talking about immigration or don’t ask don’t tell, they were deeply concerned about China’s economic prowess. These were not folks looking for high tariff walls, but rather people worried about that nation’s headway in infrastructure projects like high speed rail and solar energy. Or their nascent entry into the auto industry. Real and smart things to worry about, with few solutions from the campaign trail.
Economic conditions are also a prime source of worry for many, many Americans. We know about the high unemployment rates and the foreclosures, but these numbers all too often seem like just that–abstract figures. Talk instead to my students, bright young people who upon graduating, planned for a rough startup but a generally rosy future. Instead, they’re finding that they can’t get jobs. Any jobs, even at fast food.
Figures on youth voting are dicey–sometimes strong, sometimes low turnout. But their parents vote, and these folks are really worried. They fear that their kids will be the first generation in our history to be substantially less well off than their parents. They fear that America is losing its pizzazz, its spirit, its leadership, both at home and abroad.
Our political class isn’t addressing this on a grand scale, with only small solutions at best. And the tea party heads that list of dysfunctional political organizations. They are a fine outlet for rage, but its solutions are too often bigoted, extreme right wing, at odds with the American way, and sometimes downright looney. Their answer to China, for example, is simply “Buy American,” an idea doomed to failure in this age of international price competition, rather than a thoughtful economic strategy that pushes our industries, our workers, into the forefront of the global race.
Above all, with their thoughtless lashing out and narrow platform, they divide, rather than unite. What we need is a program that a lot more Americans can get behind, that can pull us together towards progress. To take, in other words, that legitimate, well-founded anger, and use it to get us together so we can break gridlock and move forward. That is what our political class has failed at. It has not channeled that outcry into constructive projects that a vast majority of Americans support, and that will get us back on top.
As an initial project, I would like to suggest an unlikely proposal. How about an effort to get a constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United Case, that permitted unlimited spending by big corporations in political campaigns?
Before you dismiss this as a left wing approach, or as too small, consider its ramifications. Regarding politics: believe it or not, I follow a number of right wing, grass roots discussion groups. One issue they agree with progressives is over corporate abuses. Like many on the left, they are angry over support for large corporations while at the same time families lose their homes. They are very mad at the fact that giant private sector organizations are treated like private citizens before the law, despite the vast, overwhelming disparity in resources (how many of you earn more than $200,000 a year? How many multi-national corporations make less than $200 million?). Many of them are opposed to the Court’s decision. On the issue of money in politics, there is also striking common ground. Both the 2008 Obama campaign and the tea party movement, while each enjoyed donations from wealthy donors, made use of massive outreach, and sought grass roots funding.
This would not be an easy matter to pull off. If the concept ever gained traction, business money would swarm in to stop it, and corporate stooges in both parties would speak out in favor of smart, articulate, and very un-democratic ideas.
It would also not solve any of our direct economic problems, not make us more competitive with China, lower our prices for goods, or produce any important new technology.
But it might bring warring factions of grass roots America together, the start of a real move to solve our problems, with more important solutions to follow. And that could actually reverse the slide downward, and push us frontward instead. Not a bad goal in itself, with potential galore for ending gridlock and producing positive results.
If you like this idea, pass it on.
My tentative moniker for this new approach? I call it the America Ascendant Movement (AAM).

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

The 101010 Global Work Party Kicks Off

by , under NEWS
The 101010 Global Work Party Kicks Off

We’re sitting here in the temporary 350.org HQ in Washington, DC watching photos stream in from all over the world. They’re all a part of today’s 10/10/10 Global Work Party, the biggest day of climate action in the planets history.
About half of the 7,000 events in 188 countries have taken place already. People greeted the sunrise in New Zealand, raced to clean up trash in Beijing, planted thousands of mangroves in the Philippines, installed solar panels in South Africa and Namibia, marched by the thousands in Istanbul, and more.
The best news? There’s still much more to come. All around the world, across race and nation, we’re sending a clear message to our politicians: we’re getting to work, now it’s your turn.
Take a look at some of the photos and please help spread the word:
Wellington, New Zealand
1 of 17
Adorable Or Ugly? Controversial Pets And Wild Animals (PHOTOS)
Daseep The Tiger Cub: Baby Sumatra Tiger Born To Mother Previously Thought To Be Infertile (PHOTOS)
Census Of Marine Life: Decade-Long International Effort Completed, Shows Connectedness Of Oceanic Creatures Across The World (PHOTOS)
How To Plant Garlic (PHOTOS)
James Hansen Arrested With 100 Others At Mountaintop Removal Mining Protest In DC (PHOTOS)
Adorable Miniature Animals: The Smallest Version of Animals You Know And Love (PHOTOS)
The sun rises on 10/10/10 on the east coast of New Zealand
comments(0)
<>
Total comments: 0 | Post a Comment
Rate This Slide
Rank #2 | Average: 8.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Current Top 5 Slides
loading…
Choose your Top 5 Slides
UserName
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Top User Slides
<>
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Users who voted on this slide
<>
loading…

Follow Bill McKibben on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/billmckibben

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

The Great American Credit Catastrophe Is Our Generations 911

by , under NEWS
The Great American Credit Catastrophe Is Our Generations 911

The 911 of the Middle Class is the consumer credit debacle. It is the gift that keeps on giving. The reality is that the housing crisis is just one piece of this really big, ugly mess. It seems to me that our President MUST call for immediate reform and take action through executive order. Call me politically nave, but we need action. Unemployment continues to hover close to 10%, and higher in badly hit areas. Interest paid by the banks on savings ranges from less than 1% to maybe 2.5% on a good day. The consumer credit card companies, though regulated now sort of, ran naked through the streets jacking up everyone’s interest rates to over 15 to 30%. Yes they have to notify the poor, irresponsible slobs now before they do things, but the banks still get to burn kerosene in the town square with no permits. And we haven’t even gotten to the health insurance yahoos that have four more years for their trickery. Oh Nelly, bar the door! It’s the Wild West again as the cattle are corralled – only this time it’s the American people being herded to ruin by the giddy-up bankers and health insurance companies, not just the mortgage guys.
People are getting sick from worry. Their backs hurt, their necks are out, and they are grinding their pearly whites. Few sleep well at night. Pharmaceutical sales are up. The banks we saved are savaging us. They are bulldozing the Middle Class under mountains of debt. People are losing their homes, divorces are up, businesses are closing, and unemployment is rampant. The consumer credit world and their FICO scores are broken. They are based on a world that no longer exists. In two short years, many consumers have watched their scores collapse under an avalanche of debt. The FICO scores were calibrated for a different time when consumer credit cards were not the only source of money available, mortgages were not under water, and unemployment was not soaring. If we are ever to unwind this situation, these algorithms must be reset. Otherwise the banks will never lend again. The Middle Class needs a do-over, just like the banks got.
Yes sir, Obama stood up against the broad sweeping foreclosure legislation, and Bank of America seized the moment halting foreclosures nationwide. But we’re all holding our breath waiting for the other shoe to fall as even Progressive strategist Mike Lux gens up the netroots to re-engage with the President and Congress. It is inconceivable that people have not taken to streets in protest over their lost pensions, and the absence of any kind of interest bearing bank account — except on consumer credit cards. In fact, this week Robert Sheer wrote brilliantly about Obama’s “No Banker Left Behind” — while every normal person has been thrown under the bank bus. How did we allow the bail-out of every financial institution, while abandoning the common folk? Why are Democrats — whether conservative, moderate or netroots – not able to channel this collective anger, rage and disappointment other than to take aim at one another? Given the data, there is no way out for the once resilient Middle Class without a do-over. Instead of “No Banker Left Behind” let us heal the Middle Class by fixing the credit industry; restricting the health care industry now, not in four years; and making those banks lend the money we gave them and not hide behind FICO scores. All of the Democrats are writing, but no one is demanding change now. The Tea Party has successfully harnessed the anger and rage, but has no plan. Frankly, they are just another distraction taking our attention away from the gravity of the problems.
Mr. President, come back to us as Mike Lux laments. We need you. We, in the Middle Class, are living this nightmare everyday of our lives. Figure it out, and get the Middle Class out from under. The numbers do not lie. This is our emergency, our call to action, our 911. Friends and neighbors are collapsing from the stress when they can ill afford it. Unemployment is not going away. Consumer debt is skyrocketing. Mr. Obama, Americans are not being frivolous and irresponsible as Dr. Summers would like you to believe. They are boxed in with no escape hatch. Consider enacting a nationwide job core like the WPA, putting the banks on real notice, corralling those nasty health insurance folks, redoing the credit industry, and loosening up cash. No one is sleeping at night. People are nervous and cannot see a future.
Please, inspire us again, show emotion, get messy, and let the wrinkles show. Mr. President raise your voice in outrage. Give us voice. Come back to us. The time is now.
See the pearltree below for the references for this article.
US Economy

Follow Michelle Kraus on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/michellekraus

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

The Hard Truth of Johnny Appleseed and a Recipe with Hard Cider

by , under NEWS
The Hard Truth of Johnny Appleseed and a Recipe with Hard Cider

When each of us was in third grade, we learned the legend of John Chapman, a.k.a. Johnny Appleseed. We were taught of his beneficence, and we marveled over the Disney-esque pen and ink drawings of him wandering barefoot through the woods, tin pot on his head, followed by an assortment of happy woodland creatures. He was the pioneer saint, there to spread the healthy goodness of apples across the frontier in advance of the great westward expansion.
What Mrs. Klein, my third grade teacher failed to tell me (likely yours failed to mention this as well), is that Chapman’s intentions were not entirely magnanimous, and the fruits of his labors were not meant for children. When he set out from Massachusetts in 1797 towards Pennsylvania, Ohio, and eventually Fort Wayne, Indiana, pioneers could lay claim to land simply by having planted a crop there. His savvy as a land speculator and as a nurseryman selling seedlings to the region’s new arrivals made him quite a wealthy man. And those apples were not meant for keeping the doctor away or giving to prairie schoolmarms. Apples grown from seeds (as opposed to grafts) were, as HD Thoreau once wrote “sour enough to set a squirrel’s teeth on edge and make a jay scream.” No, these apples were meant for cider, and not the soft sweet stuff either.
Water was risky at the time, often carrying disease or smelling of iron or sulfur. To quench a thirst, many relied on alcoholic beverages because, as would be discovered decades later, the alcohol in the liquid staved off bacterial contamination. Hard cider was among the most popular of these because of the flavor and relative ease of production.
In the pre-prohibition fervor of the early 1900′s, the apple industry need something to help distance them from the “scourge of drink” and soften their image among consumers, thus the character of Johnny Appleseed, as we learned him in elementary school, was born.
Today hard cider has fallen out of the mainstream, owing to the ages-old popularity and relatively recent ease of access of beer and wine. Here in Iowa, Scott Ervin is trying to reverse that (as are many others around the country). Just north of the historic Sutliff Bridge, Ervin is making magical, full-flavored, robust hard cider from local apples (and nothing else). Unlike the ones you may have seen in the stores, notably Woodchuck from Vermont and Woodpecker from England, Sutliff Cider has no sugar, grape or cane juice added. It’s just apples.
And because the apple varieties, sugar content and flavor profiles change from year to year, so do the ciders. They’re always excellent, though never identical, and come in 750ml bottles for $6/btl; $65/cs. Cider makers across the country are doing it too. Do you have a favorite local hard cider? List it here then make some of this traditional Spanish dish to share with your friends.
Chorizo Cooked in Cider
This is a classic tapa from the Basque region of Spain, and is also very popular in nearby Galicia, where apple growing and hard cider (sidra) have been traditions for centuries.
1 tablespoon olive oil
1 small onion, finely chopped
1-1/2 teaspoons smoked Spanish paprika (pimentn)
8 oz chorizo sausage, (Spanish, not Mexican, which is usually to spicy) cut into diagonal slices
1/2 cup hard apple cider
1/4 cup chicken stock
1 bay leaf
2 teaspoons sherry vinegar, or to taste
2 teaspoons chopped fresh parsley
In an earthenware cazuela, or a saut pan, heat the olive oil over medium high heat. Saut the onions, stirring frequently, until translucent, but not brown. Add the paprika, stir, and add the chorizo. When the chorizo is browned, add the remaining ingredients and cook a further 5-7 minutes, or until the liquid is reduced by half.
Remove the bay leaf, and serve immediately garnished with parsley, with toothpicks and cold hard cider.

Follow Kurt Michael Friese on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/KurtMFriese

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Arianna Discusses Tea Party Third World America VIDEO

by , under NEWS
Arianna Discusses Tea Party Third World America VIDEO

Arianna spoke with MSNBC’s Alex Witt on Sunday morning about her book “Third World America,” as the chances Tea Party candidates like Christine O’Donnell and Joe Miller have in the upcoming midterm elections.
The anger that many Americans feel “is producing candidates who are not electable, and Christine O’Donnell is one of them,” Arianna said. “And unfortunately whoever advised her to do that new ad about ‘I am not a witch’ didn’t do her any favors.”
“The main result of the Tea Party in the elections is going to be in the turnout — who is going to turn out is going to determine who controls the House and maybe the Senate. Of course in some cases, like in the case of Christine O’Donnell, or maybe in Nevada, in the case of Sharron Angle, the Tea Party candidate may lose Republicans the race.”
Independents, who are largely disillusioned with the political establishment, are the key bloc, Arianna says.
WATCH:

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Cry To Me A Loving Playlist For The Late Great Solomon Burke

by , under NEWS
Cry To Me A Loving Playlist For The Late Great Solomon Burke

Solomon Burke was not only one of the most soulful singers in history; he was quite possibly the single most soulful man who I ever met. I had the honor of sharing time with this timeless soul giant and inspiring preacher twice. The first was a short interview for Rolling Stone sometime in the midst of his inspiring professional revival that followed the release of his stunning 2002 comeback album Don’t Give Up On Me. I’d been a fan of the man’s body of work for years, but what struck me about the man was how singularly warm, wise and funny he was one to one. A father of many children himself, Solomon asked about my kids with what felt like genuine and caring interest. I felt like he turned our conversation into some kind of soulful conversion. As a singer and as a man, he put out a lot of love into the world and made you feel a spirit, if not the spirit.
A few years later, in 2007, I got to spend a day or two with the great man in the flesh when I was asked to co-write the script for what became an extraodinary Ahmet Ertegun memorial at Jazz At Lincoln Center along with Taylor Hackford, a soul scholar who loved Solomon too. Solomon had agreed to serve as our MC, along with another strong force of nature, Bette Midler. Even though getting around was not particularly easy for Solomon even then, there was no doubt that he remained a beautiful, powerful and profound presence, onstage and off. Yes, he was a “Big Soul” and he was “The King of Rock ‘N Soul.” But as I saw it, he was also one soulful and lovable mensch.
By any standards, Solomon Burke was one of music’s greatest characters ever — a spiritual leader, a tireless capitalist and a majestic talent whose genius was recognized by millions of fans, and by many fellow greats who he influenced like Van Morrison and the Rolling Stones.
When I woke up this morning to the news of Solomon’s death, I thought back immediately to the first time that I ever spoke with him. Solomon ended our conversation by saying, “May God bless you, son,” in a way that somehow made me feel truly blessed. I know he made a lot of people all over the world feel that way too.
God bless you, Solomon Burke. You will be missed.
Here are ten recordings by which to remember this great man where you can still feel his generous and enduring spirit.
CRY TO ME – Solomon Burke
EVERYODY NEEDS SOMEBODY TO LOVE – Solomon Burke
FAST TRAIN – Solomon Burke
DOWN IN THE VALLEY – Solomon Burke
GOT TO GET YOU OFF OF MY MIND – Solomon Burke
TOMORROW IS FOREVER – Solomon Burke with Dolly Parton
JUST OUT OF REACH (OF MY TWO EMPTY ARMS) – Solomon Burke
WE’RE GONNA HOLD ON – Solomon Burke with Emmylou Harris
IF YOU NEED ME – Solomon Burke
A MINUTE TO REST AND A SECOND TO PRAY – Solomon Burke
What song will you remember Solomon Burke by?

Follow David Wild on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/Wildaboutmusic

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

To Counter Currency Manipulation Rally Some Allies

by , under NEWS
To Counter Currency Manipulation Rally Some Allies

Japan, no economic small fry, challenged China last month. The conclusion of the dispute is a cautionary tale for countries confronting China about currency manipulation.
In September, Japan seized a Chinese trawler captain after his boat collided with two Japanese Coast Guard ships near some East China Sea islands claimed by both countries.
Immediately afterward, China “coincidentally” detained four Japanese employees of Fujita Corp., charging them with filming in a restricted military area. When Japan proposed a prisoner swap, China upped the ante instead — halting shipments of rare earth minerals to Japan. China controls 93 percent of the world’s rare earths, which are minerals essential for manufacturing high-tech and energy-efficient products, from cell phones to wind turbines.
Japan caved, releasing the Chinese captain unconditionally. Suddenly, China rescinded its restriction on rare earth exports to Japan and released three of the four imprisoned Japanese nationals, ending the dispute one captive ahead of Japan.
This incident confirmed China as a burly international tyrant. The caution for countries attempting to negotiate with China is to avoid Japan’s mistake, which was single-handedly contesting the giant. For America, that means seeking an end to China’s currency manipulation by simultaneously pursuing every option the United States has, including formally naming China a currency manipulator, imposing tariffs on imports from countries that undervalue currency and creating a community of allies to campaign together to combat the illegal trade practice.
Rallying partners should be reasonably easy, as Japan, Brazil and the European Union all have exhorted China in recent weeks to allow the value of its currency to freely float on international markets.
Like the United States, each has acted unilaterally. Last week, EU finance ministers confronted Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao at a European-Asian economic summit in Brussels. Wen rejected their demands for China to speed appreciation of the yuan in relationship to the euro.
Also last week, Brazil doubled a tax it charges foreigners who purchase Brazilian bonds. This was an attempt to slow speculation that has increased the value of its currency, the real, by 39 percent against the dollar over the past 22 months.
A day later, Japan announced it would lower its benchmark interest rate and purchase $60 billion in government bonds and securities, both actions designed to lower the value of the yen, which would cheapen its exports.
The Swiss tried intervening in the market in 2009 to hold down the value of its currency, the franc, but failed. Singapore, Thailand, India and Canada have considered it.
So far, America has just attempted to persuade China to stop undervaluing the yuan – a practice that artificially suppresses the price of Chinese exports while at the same time artificially raising the price of imports into China from America and other nations. China’s deliberate currency undervaluation accounts for a significant part of America’s massive trade deficit with China.
Last spring, the United States asked China politely to allow the value of its currency to float up. As the United States awaited China’s answer, the U.S. Treasury delayed issuing its semi-annual foreign exchange report in which it could name China as a currency manipulator, then initiate a formal response.
China replied June 19 that it would allow the yuan to float on international currency markets. Treasury then released its report – which, no surprise, failed to list China as a currency manipulator. Since China’s announcement, the yuan has increased in value less than two percent – this for a currency believed by many economists, including the conservative C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, to be undervalued between 25 and 40 percent.
Annoyed with China’s failure to keep its pledge and angry over unfair trade gutting 2 million jobs from the body of the American economy over the past decade, Congress reacted just before its recess. With massive bi-partisan support, the House passed a bill that would allow the Commerce Department to impose tariffs on imports to counter the effects of currency manipulation. If passed by the Senate and signed by President Obama, it would expand the definition of improper government subsidies to include manipulation of currency to gain trade advantages.
Afterward, just nine days before the next Treasury report on currency manipulation is due on Oct. 15, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, in a speech at the Brookings Institution, offered thinly veiled criticism of China’s persistent manipulation:
“When large economies with undervalued exchange rates act to keep the currency from appreciating, that encourages other countries to do the same. . . This sets off a dangerous dynamic.”
In rebuffing the European Union’s request for revaluing, the Chinese prime minister claimed allowing the yuan to appreciate too quickly would bankrupt Chinese factories as their prices rose to uncompetitive levels, and the resulting exodus of unemployed workers to the countryside would provoke social unrest.
No one wants that. Workers everywhere applaud the rise of millions of Chinese citizens out of abject poverty. But increasing the value of the yuan will benefit Chinese workers at the same time as it begins to balance currencies worldwide. An appreciated yuan effectively increases Chinese workers’ wages.
By deliberately undervaluing its currency, the government of China is waging a stealth trade war against the rest of the world. Independently, the United States must protect its economy, but to reign in this international outlaw, America also must secure the help of a posse.

Follow Leo W. Gerard on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/uswblogger

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Standing Up for Our Gay Kids

by , under NEWS
Standing Up for Our Gay Kids

I don’t often share many personal things about myself in sermons, but tonight I am going to. Not so you can get to know me better, but to make a point. All things being equal, I have been very fortunate to live a pretty sheltered, privileged life. As a white, upper middle class, straight, American Jew born in the latter half of the 20th century and now living in the 21st century, I have had it good. I have never faced direct anti-Semitism or had my life threatened in any way. I have never been a slave, like Bill Nathan, the amazing director of the St. Joseph Home for Boys in Haiti told us this week, when he spoke at PJTC, that he was from age 6-8. I have never had any noticeable physical, psychological, emotional disabilities that would draw attention to me as being different, subject to potential ridicule. The worst that I have had, I guess, was when I was only 4’11” tall through 11th grade, before shooting up 7 inches in one summer. But, I was cute and popular with the girls, so even that wasn’t so bad. I was an athlete, did well in school, was student body president in high school and went on to college and a successful career. I don’t remember being teased that much as a kid, was bullied once, maybe, in my first week of high school, but nothing major. I didn’t stutter, have a birth mark, like my sister’s huge red mark on her left cheek, always had friends. I went to Hebrew High school and excelled, summers at Camp Ramah where I was in the “in” crowd, and so, I have never really known what it is like to be subjected to humiliation, taunting, teasing, bullying or alienation. And so, for sure, I have absolutely no idea what it must have been like to be Tyler Clementi, or one of the other four gay young people who took their lives in the last three weeks. These deaths are horrible tragedies, not only for their families, whose pain is unimaginable, but for us as a nation, as we mourn the loss of 5 young people, the oldest 19, the youngest 13, who took their lives, it appears in all five cases, because of either the torment they endured for being gay, or being thought gay by their peers, or in Tyler’s case, because of the public humiliation that he felt after his college roommates video taped him and another young man having sex in their dorm room and streamed it live on the internet. Young Seth Walsh, a 13-year old boy in Tahachapi, CA, featured in today’s LA Times, was a bright, loving child who knew he was gay, tried to be himself, express himself and was taunted for it. He was teased since the 4th grade because he liked to play with girls, didn’t like sports, wasn’t aggressive or assertive — he was called a sissy, that is where it began. Three years later, it ended with him hanging himself in his backyard. The others were Billy Lucas, 15 and Asher Brown, 13. Five young people now gone. The challenge tonight is that this could be many sermons: the issue of homosexuality in our society, the issue of bullying and teasing amongst our kids, the issue of privacy and the Internet, and I am sure a few other things as well. I am going to focus on the first issue, homosexuality and our society, and our own community.
In his groundbreaking book, Wrestling with God and Men, Rabbi Steve Greenberg, the first self-identified gay Orthodox rabbi, writes about a response he got from another Orthodox rabbinic scholar asked to comment on his coming out and continuing to identify as Orthodox. Greenberg had been hiding his true sexuality since the time he was a teen, trying to date women, be a “normal” boy, and actually was almost married to a woman once. Raised in a non-religious home, Greenberg discovered Orthodoxy as a young teen and became more and more religious as he grew up. Greenberg’s first step into speaking his truth came in 1992 when he authored a piece that was printed in Tikkun magazine, under a pseudonym, Rabbi Yaakov Levado, meaning “Jacob alone,” which he writes is based on the story of the Biblical Jacob and how he remains alone the night before meeting his brother Esau, and famously wrestling with the angel, which most of the commentators understand as a wrestling with himself to identify who he truly is. The outcome of that Biblical story, as we know, is that Jacob becomes Israel; the outcome of Greenberg’s piece is that he started to no longer be “levado, alone,” but become fully himself. He explains why he couldn’t reveal his true identity in the article, saying, “I feared that the cost of honesty and realness would be isolation and marginalization. Coming out would compress my life into a narrow and grossly overdetermined identity. I bristled at the thought of being known widely as ‘the gay Orthodox rabbi.’” (Greenberg, p. 10) Yet, the letters he received, from folks around the world, both gay and straight, Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews, gave him courage and a taste of support and acceptance. But, he also got responses such as this, from an Orthodox colleague, “A gay Orthodox rabbi is an absurdity as inconceivable as an Orthodox rabbi who eats cheeseburgers on Yom Kippur. There is no such thing as a gay Orthodox rabbi.”
While this seems like a pretty ridiculous response, unfortunately, Greenberg got many of these, rabbis who seemed fine dismissing him, brushing off his soul and who he was with the flick of their finger, choosing to use Biblical and Talmudic laws to alienate this human being rather than using the same laws to try and embrace him. But, he didn’t expect to find that from his Orthodox colleagues. Rabbi Greenberg is a unique and amazing person, a scholar and master teacher in his own right, and he responded this way to that comment, writing, “While commitment to halachic (legal) norms is central to the definition of Orthodoxy, the rabbi’s comparison is absurd. Human sexuality is not a gastronomic whim, and lifelong intimacy is not a cheeseburger. Nobody jumps off a bridge because he or she is deprived of a cheeseburger. No one sinks in clinical depression or submits to electroshock therapy for the sake of a ham sandwich. The gross misunderstanding of human sexual expression as mere bodily gratification is all the more shocking in this case because the rabbi who made the comparison between sexuality and cheeseburgers is not only a scholar in the rabbinical school but a physician as well.” (p. 12) One more word on Greenberg’s life before coming to today. He remained within the Orthodox world, and is still a leading scholar. He writes in his book, “Is it possible to believe that, in light of new realities, the standard halachic ruling on homosexual relations is in error and still be a loyal advocate of the system? I think so. I am committed to the halachic system, both in theory and practice. However, I believe that the proper Halachah, the one that treats this phenomenon responsibly, honestly, and intelligently, is not the present one. In fact, I believe that avoiding the issue of sexuality and gender at this moment in history will prove disastrous.” (p. 13) I couldn’t agree with Rabbi Greenberg more.
I have spoken several times before about my support of gays and lesbians, how I believe that we are all God’s children and like other discriminations of the past, be it women, African-Americans, people with disabilities or any other subset of the human family that doesn’t look like what we think is the “norm” for acceptance, I believe that we will one day overcome the discrimination against the LGBT community. And, in many ways, we have come a long way. Many states have civil unions for gay couples, even if marriage is not yet fully available. One day it will be. Many families have opened their hearts and souls to loved ones who are gay. One day, I pray, all families will. Our country is getting closer to not discriminating against gays in the military, and one day, pretty soon I believe, the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law will be repealed and those soldiers fighting for our country won’t be discriminated against by the very government for which they are volunteering to risk their lives. And in our community at Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center, we are growing more sensitive and aware each year. We have gay families in our shul, one of whom you will hear from in just a moment, and we are planning a diversity training session with all of our staff, teachers and volunteers for sometime in the coming months. We are looking at our applications and forms for membership and the religious school to make sure they are welcoming and inclusive to all people, and we are looking to change how to format our synagogue directory for the same reasons. We have had conversations and dialogue in our high school classes on sexuality and we will continue to do so. My main thrust for tonight was to stand up, speak out and make sure it is known that I am fully supportive of the LGBT community, and as a clergy person, I am open to marrying two Jewish, committed and loving gay people, as I am committed to doing so for straight people. My office is a safe and welcoming place for teens to speak to me about their own sexuality, and I want to help with any fears, frustration or feelings that come with the process of discovering one’s own sexuality. I will not tolerate any discrimination, taunting, bullying, teasing or exclusion of gays and lesbians, or anyone for that matter, at PJTC and I won’t tolerate it from any of my staff or our volunteers. We all don’t have to agree, I know, but we all have to treat people with respect and dignity. Kavod ha’briot, honoring all living creatures, is a strong value in Judaism, and one that is a part of our PJTC community.
I close with some words of Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the chief rabbi of Palestine before Israel was a state. He was a unique figure, one who should be more well known than he is by the greater Jewish community, for he was a giant of his age. Writing in 1920, Rav Kook was one of the first Orthodox rabbis to declare his support for the Zionist movement. Most of his colleagues found it to be a rebellion against God, for only God could bring about the return to Zion, not to mention the Zionist movement was overwhelming secular in nature and not based on Jewish law or ritual practice; therefore it was deemed against Jewish law to support Zionism. Rabbi Greenberg, a revolutionary in our time, took courage from Rav Kook, who said, “There are times when there is a need to violate the words of the Torah since there is no one in the generation who can show the way to do it permissibly, and so it comes as a breach. It would be much better if such violations of the law came about as unintentional transgressions, as the saying goes, ‘Better they be accidental sinners rather than intentional sinners.’ However, only when a prophetic spirit rests on the people of Israel is it possible to fix such matters legally by a decree of the sages…But by the obstruction of the light of prophecy, the matter is fixed by a breaking of the law, the external manifestation of which saddens the heart and yet gladdens the heart by its inner essence.” (Rav Kook, Arpelei Tohar, as quoted by Greenberg, p. 242) Rav Kook is saying that sometimes we have to be rebellious in order to create the change we know to be right. Rabbi Greenberg writes that Rav Kook teaches us that the legal system is not self-contained. That there are leaps of judgment that the legal system cannot make by its own internal mechanism. We are voices of the heart, we are the voices of the love and compassion that the legal system is not capable of, nor responsible for, creating. How many more children must take their lives out of fear and depression and sadness and loneliness before we, the adults and creators of the destiny of our world, stand up and breach the system? Even one more child is too many. I am standing up and saying enough, and I invite you to join me.

Follow Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/rabbijoshua

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

What Is Scripture

by , under NEWS
What Is Scripture

This is the first in a series of blogs I would like to offer on the question, “What is Scripture?” In each blog, I plan to summarize and briefly comment on how this question is answered by one of a number different authors from various traditions. The blog is inspired by students in my current graduate course on the same topic. Hopefully they will also enrich the blog with their comments.
The name of this series is taken from the title of a wonderful book by Wilfred Cantwell Smith (1916-2000), What Is Scripture? Smith was one of the great scholars of the new academic field of Religious Studies — gentle in judgment and voice, eager to learn about all the world’s religious traditions, and not afraid to learn from his own Protestant Christianity as well. In this 1993 book Smith asked a broad audience of readers what we mean when we use the English word “scripture.” If one of us is, say, a Buddhist, another a Baptist, and another an atheist, what are we referring to when we apply the general word “scripture” to refer to very different books held dear or not so dear by very different people? Smith observes that most of us, in fact, do not know what we mean, and those of us who think we know tend to disagree sharply with each other’s definitions. As I hear it, here is his remedy:
We should abandon two unhelpful approaches to scripture. The first is to define the word “scripture” in a way that fits only the one scripture that our own faith tradition considers sacred. The second is to define the word in one crystal-clear way that is supposed to apply to every possible example. The first way is unhelpful because we live in a pluralist world where each of us who cherishes one tradition of scripture lives next door to someone else who cherishes another tradition. Nothing should keep us from speaking publicly about the scripture we love, and no good is served if we scoff at what our neighbors cherish. The second approach is unhelpful because none of us knows enough to predict the features that all scriptures may share. More than that, efforts to achieve one clear definition tend to stop up our ears from hearing approaches to scripture that we may not have heard before or expected. In fact, most traditions treat scripture as something that is always surprising, ever renewed. At the same time, we should not treat “scripture” as an entirely undefinable term, since most of us use the word to locate a vital place in our religious traditions.
The best way to begin a study of scripture is to step out of our own houses a bit and travel to (or at least read about) the ways a number of traditions name this vital place. Smith notes, for example, that the Chinese word “ching” designates books that hold a special status in the lives of Buddhists, Taoists, and Confucians alike. These books are highly valued as primary sources of instruction in how to live one’s life. In this instance, what we call “scripture” is best defined by what it does, rather than by what we outside observers think it explicitly says. What these scriptures do is introduce into everyday life the beliefs, practices, judgment and ideas that members of a tradition value more than any others. To call a book “scripture” reflects how deeply the book is cherished, respected, and distinguished from other books by the degree of devotion it commands. Moreover, this is the devotion not of some single class of individuals but of a broad spectrum of a tradition’s major teachers and disciples. Devotion is not the whole story, however. To distinguish “ching” from other cherished books, we need to note at least one feature of its content: it refers to “the transcendent.” My students and I found it hard to pin down what Smith means by this term. But we agreed to at least this: “the transcendent” refers to that which comes from beyond the human condition.
Examining books closer to his home in the Abrahamic traditions, Smith notes how the poetry called the “Song of Songs” was included in the biblical canon despite its surface appearance as explicitly erotic love poetry. The ancient Jewish sages reread this poetry as words of love spoken between God and his people Israel. Medieval Christian theologians, such as Bernard of Clairvaux, reread it as an account of humanity’s mystic and joyous union with God. These examples suggest that the Bible shares several characteristics with “ching.” The Bible is called “scripture” by those who are devoted to its words as the words of the one they hold most dear; the desire for this one is as strong as erotic desire, except that the object of love is “transcendent,” or not merely of this world of our senses. Smith therefore observes that for both Chinese and Abrahamic traditions, “scripture” refers to the distinct sets of words (typically a “book,” but this may include words that are oral and not written) that elicit unparalleled devotion and that introduce into human society knowledge of or encounter with that which is “transcendent.”
As he guides his reader through several other scriptural traditions, Smith articulates one additional trait that may prove to be the most important of all: that one cannot hold “scripture” in one’s hand. “Scripture” refers not to any text by itself, but to an intimate and ongoing relationship between a text and the community who reads it. Or this can be put another way: “scripture” is the name a tradition applies to a set of words when and only when these words trace an intimate and ongoing relationship between a community and “the transcendent” (or one who is transcendent).
Readers of this blog will, I trust, use the word “scripture” many different ways. As we speak, reason, and even argue about these ways, I can think of no better place to begin than with Smith’s way.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

Homophobia in the Church What Catholics Are Doing About It and What Still Needs to Be Done

by , under NEWS
Homophobia in the Church What Catholics Are Doing About It and What Still Needs to Be Done

I attended a Roman Catholic baptism about two weeks ago. A crowd of young parents and others of all ages stood in semi-circle around the font. The atmosphere was reverent yet festive. Toddlers squirmed. The church was exquisite. Blades of late-morning light slid down through colored glass. The priest exuded hope and delight as he kicked off the rites. As the two parents approached the font to offer their child to the church, I began to tear up. My 11-year-old daughter Grace, not unaccustomed to my poet’s penchant for being capsized by moments so tender, saw my waterworks start up, rolled her eyes as adolescents do, smiled, and handed me a tissue. As I often do when my emotions get the best of me in the presence of my children, I get all pedagogical on them. I whispered sidebars to Grace: “That’s litany of the saints, it’s beautiful when sung in Latin… And that the part about Satan and the empty promises — it’s technically an exorcism!”
I didn’t have to explain that it was no ordinary baptism we were witnessing. She knew it was extraordinary, because I had taught her. The two parents at the font were bravely (or so I believe) demonstrating their desire not to throw the baby out with the baptismal water.
They were two gay dads asking a church governed by bullies to bless their child.
My daughter later asked how it was that gay people could have their children baptized in Catholic churches but not be married in them. Good question. I broke it down for her. I told her a far greater percentage of Catholics support gay marriage than support the Vatican. I characterized the failure of my church to offer gay Catholics marriage in the church as just that — “a failure.” And a sin.
There are many layers to the sin of homophobia that the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church commits. Most people within and outside the church know, for example, that the Vatican preaches homophobia and does not consecrate same-sex marriages.
But many Catholics do not know that hundreds of thousands of their charitable dollars to groups like Knights of Columbus are currently being used to bankroll the fight against legislation that would make civil gay marriage legal.
Most Catholics know that the church is in a unique position when it comes to the question of gay marriage for several reasons, not the least of which is that by many estimates, more than 50 percent of Catholic priests are gay. Many Catholics know that many of the bishops who set the homophobic agenda are themselves closeted gay men grappling with the psychological fallout of growing up gay in a hostile homophobic world and church. Rumbling so ironically beneath the surface of the Catholic homophobia question is that even the most conservative Roman Catholic often has an expansive view of gay priests. Catholics of all stripes agree that many of our finest priests are gay.
Another unique feature of Roman Catholic homophobia has to do with the way we look at the Bible. Catholics don’t construe the Bible literally, so Catholic objections to homosexual marriage tend not to fix upon the biblical notion that being gay is an “abomination.” Indeed some of the most holy among us enjoy the biblical abominations without the slightest fear of being accused of sinfulness: we eat shrimp and pork at every opportunity, and we give little thought to shaving our beards or to wearing linen with wool.
No, the Vatican’s homophobia derives from political and economic concerns, as well as from the larger erotic dysfunction that pervades the church. Patriarchal heterosexual marriage keeps the coffers filled. Two gay men or two lesbians may have a few children but they won’t be easily coerced by doctrine to welcome a child a year. People who actually plan the size of their families aren’t likely to make the kind of large lockstep Catholic clans the Holy See envisions for its City of God.
The Pope is smart enough to make small accommodations in order to keep gay people in the pews. Gay people are currently welcome to receive the sacraments and serve in ministry, but reminders from Vatican City never let it be forgotten that only gay people who abstain entirely from sex are truly fit for the sacraments. While the prohibition against all sexual activity outside sacramental marriage extends to straight, gay, bisexual and transgendered people, it can hardly be said to apply equally to all when for a gay Catholic there is no sacramental marriage option.
Catholics are leaving in droves, but dissenters, many of whom are gay, are also staying in droves. On the matter of gay Catholics, the Holy See wishes to have its cake and eat it, too. Thus, the Pope blesses with one hand and pummels with the other.
But the dissenters have a City of God in mind, too.
The Ad Hoc Committee of the U.S. Conference of Bishops, in its “Defense of Marriage,” defines traditional Roman Catholic marriage as “a covenant between one man and one woman directed to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of children.” Although the traditional view is that marriage is first and foremost procreative, there’s more to it. There’s the good of the spouses. Were non-procreative marital sex viewed by the Magisterium as sinful, menopausal wives and sterile spouses would be called upon to abstain from sex even within marriage. But the bishops do not teach that all marital sex need be procreative. Allowances are made for sex they characterize as “unitive.” Sex to keep the marriage strong, in other words, has a divine purpose. I like this idea; It reminds me of how Shabbos (marital) sex is thought by many Jews to be a mitzvah. While committed gay partners obviously cannot have procreative sex, they can and do certainly have the unitive kin, yet the Catholic Church hierarchy persists in depriving LGBT people of this mitzvah (blessing) on the grounds that marriage is essentially procreative even while teaching that marriage is not exclusively procreative.
It’s no secret that Ratzinger’s enmity and the bishops’ disrespect for LGBT people runs deep. The bishop of the Brooklyn and Queens diocese has already been caught on the radio comparing homosexual love to bestiality. A child being educated in Catholic schools learns that only gay men and women who abstain from sex are worthy of the sacraments, but that sinful heterosexual lovemaking is transformed by a sacrament (marriage) powerful enough to render the sexual aspect of love a radiant reflection of Christ’s love, from which radiance the Vatican insists gay Catholics should be excluded.
Fortunately, many gay Catholics, and so many others in the church, disregard the perverse and tyrannical efforts of the bishops to police the sex lives of Catholics and discern. But tuning out the hatred the bishops disseminate may not be enough when it comes to homophobia.
When the daughter of the two aforementioned dads undertakes preparation to receive the sacraments, it is entirely possible that she will be exposed to the diluted version of the “God hates fags” message that issues from the Vatican today. Parents like hers will surely interfere; they will come between her and the hideous so-called “Christian” message. Such vigilance can help to protect the 10 percent of children in the pews who happen to be gay, but Catholics must not leave this work to gay Catholic parents alone. Pastors, catechists and parents who fail to challenge homophobia help to make the church a dangerous place for gay children and keep the world outside the church safe for bigotry.
I worked for more than a decade teaching writing in New York high schools and colleges, during which time I came to notice that the autobiographical writing of many of my gay male students frequently contained talk of suicide. So common were these accounts of suicide attempts and fantasies that I came to expect them, as cultural norms, almost, in coming-out/coming-of-age narratives. I was as confounded as I was alarmed by the preponderance of variations on the following plot: kid comes out to his parents, kid gets beaten by his parents, kid runs away, kid is victimized by street predators, kid tries to make it all go away with an accidental overdose. The preoccupation with suicide seemed to go beyond depression. These young men had learned self-hatred early. The musings on suicide seemed not so much about the desire to end one’s own misery as about seeking to murder oneself. Sexual identity is not an incidental or add-on; it infuses one’s whole self.
Which is why the “love the sinner, hate the sin” principle does not apply. Being gay is not a sin.
My brother Scott came out of the closet about a decade ago at the age of 42 and died three years later. I still can’t get my head around the idea that he didn’t come out to me sooner. We were very close; we both knew that I would have celebrated his coming out. When he finally did come out, we talked about why he had waited so long. “I couldn’t come out to myself,” he said.
What is a church good for if it requires its people to divorce themselves from who they are?
What is a church good for if it’s not a sanctuary for all who would come out of the closet?
I have vivid memories of our father’s disapproval of Scott in childhood. When I look at my own children, I find it almost unbearable to imagine them suffering such a lack of acceptance at home. As the parent of a child with a developmental disability, I have seen close-up how damaging the failure to educate children about prejudice can be. No child should ever learn from a trusted adult that that it is somehow unholy to be gay. That truly is an abomination.
My children were about eight and four when their Uncle Scott brought his partner, to whom he referred as “Uncle Frank.” I told him to “slow down on the Uncle Frank thing.” (I’d have said the same thing about an “Aunt Franny.”) But once I met Scott’s beloved, I wanted him to be “Uncle Frank.” I wanted my children to witness my brother’s freedom to claim his right to love in a committed, authentic, whole and holy way. I jumped at the chance to present “Uncle Frank” to my children and saw the opportunity to do so as a blessing, for there may be no lesson more important than teaching children to eschew bigotry in all its guises.
Very recently, around the time of what would have been my brother’s 51st birthday, I received a press release describing Equally Blessed, a new group formed by four Catholic organizations: DignityUSA, Fortunate Families, New Ways Ministry and Call to Action. Equally Blessed is “a coalition of faithful Catholics who support full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people both in the church and in civil society.” Three of the Catholic organizations that comprise Equally Blessed have been in existence for more than 30 years. Call to Action has 25,000 members. Support for gay marriage in the Roman Catholic Church is strong and on the increase. Like Equally Blessed, Catholics for Equality, a group newly formed to “draw on the rich Catholic tradition of social justice teaching” to advocate for “equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) of any religious group on the United States” currently denounces the use (or misuse, rather) of Catholic resources to prevent civil gay marriage reform. It is important for active Catholics to support groups like Equally Blessed and Catholics for Equality because secular homophobia originates in and takes its license from worship communities.
Many priests like Georgetown sociology professor and author Joseph Palacios, who co-founded Catholics for Equality, speak out courageously against injustice as it pertains to gay people within and outside of the Roman Catholic Church, but Ratzinger and his legions are doing all they can to silence such men. It may be safer for a priest to sodomize a child than to challenge the Vatican’s position on gay marriage.
How odd it is that as bishops begin to close down parishes for reasons of economic hardship, Catholic funding can be found to support efforts to defeat civil marriage legislation outside the church. (The Holy See doesn’t recognize the civil marriages of Catholics!) The readiness to use Catholic donations to stop civil legislation indicates an increasing willingness on the part of church leaders to export Roman Catholic homophobia into the secular world. Too many leaders (of various sects) lend their seals of approval to those who would couch homophobic messages in doctrine or scripture, and use their spiritual and psychological leverage — and cash donations — to cheat LGBT people out of their legal and moral rights.
Until the homophobes in Vatican City grow up decide it is time to “reject Satan… and all his empty promises,” all Catholics — but especially catechists, pastors and parents of children receiving religious instruction — need to step in as godparents to our leaders, summon the Holy Spirit, and work for peace by waging war on homophobia — which people do die of.

Follow Michele Somerville on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/NYpoet

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
10

The Christian Responsibility to Heal the World of Divisions

by , under NEWS
The Christian Responsibility to Heal the World of Divisions

On Sunday, Sep. 26, many Christian churches around the world heard the story of the rich man and Lazarus from the gospel of Luke 16:19-31. As I reflected on this story, I was reminded once again of our Christian responsibility to heal the world of all divisions. The rich man in this story is not condemned because he is wealthy, nor is he condemned because of what he did with his wealth. He is condemned because of what he did not do. He is condemned because he did not spend his time, talents and treasures to bridge the gap between Lazarus and himself. The chasm that existed between the rich man and Lazarus is symbolic of the different chasms we have created and maintained in our society.
What are those chasms and who are the Lazaruses? There are several divisions that exist in our society: the rich and the poor, those who dine sumptuously and those who go hungry, gay and straight, whites and people of color, Christians and other religions like Islam. Our Lazaruses are the marginalized or those who are disadvantaged because of the side of the divide where they find themselves. In our society, these are the poor, the hungry, gays, people of color, and Muslims. These are the least of our brothers and sisters that Jesus Christ expects Christians to care for. We cannot ignore them, deride them or pretend that they do not exist. Christians not only have a responsibility to help them, but they must fight to tear down the structures of inequality in our society. Christians cannot sit passively when the rights of Muslims are being violated just because they belong to a different religious tradition. They must act because we all have a common origin. The same God created Muslims and Christians (and people of other faiths). I was not created by a black God or a white God. The God who created gay people is not different from the God who created straight people. The poor are also created by the same God who creates the rich. We all are created by one God. We all share the image and the likeness of one God.
When Christians fail to address these inequalities or when they promote these inequalities no matter their religious reasons, they are widening the gulf in our society, thereby casting themselves on the wrong side, the side of the rich man in the scriptures. Most of the people carrying placards, marching against Islam and against help for the poor of our society are Christians. When Christians deny Muslims the right to build a mosque for their worship, they are denying them a fundamental right to choose to worship God in their own way. God did not give each one of us free will by accident. We can choose to worship him or not. The freedom to worship God, our Christian God or a non-Christian God, is a fundamental Christian teaching. As Christians, we believe that people would make the choice to serve our God, but we cannot force them to make that choice, nor should we deny them the resources that would enable them to make that choice.
Jesus Christ was a healer and not a divider. He was tolerant toward the Samaritans whom his people did not agree with. On his journey to Jerusalem, he did not only extend a hand of friendship to the Samaritans; he rebuked James and John when they tried to call down fire to consume them because they were not hospitable to Jesus. Christians must work to bridge the divisions that exist in our society. It is in doing so that we can become like Jesus: healers and not dividers.
Read more about what we are doing to heal the world of divisions at www.racialdialogue.com.

Follow Rev. Bekeh Utietiang on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/bekeh

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
© Copyright All Global News on One Page 2011. All rights reserved.