A few weeks ago, our dog Kiva was bitten on the nose by a baby rattlesnake. Kristen was walking him on a bike path near our home in Tucson and Kiva pounced on a bush, hoping to feast on a lizard but got much more than he bargained for.
She took him to our vet whose office was fortunately just a few blocks away and she was told that the situation was serious. Kiva needed at least one vial of antivenim serum ($900 a vial) along with numerous blood tests, IVs, and other treatments if everything went well. Within an hour, Kiva’s head looked like a pinata after a wild party but he was lucky and made a full recovery in just a few days.
But this is not an article about my wonderful dog or our good fortune. It is about the epiphany I experienced during the 24 hours that he was in the doggie hospital.
Actually, it is about the check-in process. Before the hospital would agree to accept Kiva as a patient, we had to go into a special room to make financial arrangements. We were told that his treatment would cost between $2,500 and $4,000 and that they wouldn’t admit him unless and until we gave them a credit card up front and let them charge us up front for $2,400 — 60 percent of the high estimate. If we didn’t have the cash, we could take Kiva home and take our chances.
They then told us that unless we signed an agreement to pay them an additional $600 (minimum) up front, they would take no action to resuscitate him if he suffered a heart attack or some other crisis in the middle of the night.
We agreed to their terms and, happily we picked up our very valuable canine son the next day — well on his way to a full recovery. The treatment was a complete success. Everyone at the doggie hospital was delightful and responsive to our calls and treated Kiva and us wonderfully.
But it got me thinking.
Our dog is alive today because we had $4,000 that we were willing and able to pay to keep him alive. I’m pretty sure that he received a higher level of care than the vast majority of humans in the world and most in our own country.
In the U.S., no hospital would turn away or refuse to treat an accident victim or someone whose life was in imminent danger. But follow up care, treatments for life-threatening conditions, and cutting-edge surgeries are often only available for those who are willing or able to pay up front.
As a type-1 diabetic with a fake hip, no thyroid, and spots on his lung, I am not unfamiliar with doctors’ offices. In recent years, the biggest change in their decor are the many signs prominently announcing the types of insurance that are not accepted and other declarations that the physicians understandably want to make sure that they will get paid before treatment is dispensed.
Let’s be honest. About health care.
We live in a country where we pay several times what residents of other nations pay for health care and by any objective measure our outcomes are much worse. There are still more than 35 million Americans who lack any insurance coverage at all and where those of us who are insured have been paying more and more each years for less coverage, higher deductibles, and co-pays that have gone through the roof.
As a candidate for president, Barack Obama accurately identified health care reform as a top priority and most Americans agreed with him. After dozens of incarnations and versions (each of which was labeled “Obamacare” by his political enemies), an inadequate but important first step was passed and signed into law this year.
The response of the Republican leadership and and their media promoters has been to convince Americans that this undefined Obamacare has made us worse off today than we were a couple of years ago. That we are being charged much more (we aren’t) for coverage that will somehow be worse (it won’t) — even though most of the provisions of the bill haven’t even kicked in yet and really haven’t been set in stone anyway.
They have convinced millions of Americans that we are being bankrupted by a health care system that caters to dark-skinned people who pay nothing and get everything for free — Mexican immigrants and black welfare freeloaders — at the expense of the rest of us.
But let’s be honest.
All those people really get is the assurance that if they walk into an emergency room bleeding to death or with some other pressing ailment that they will be treated whether they have insurance or not.
Beyond that, tens of millions of Americans who are too young for Medicare deal with the health care system in the same way that Kristen and I dealt with Kiva’s vets. If you have a long-term chronic condition or symptoms of something seems like it might be serious, you’d better be covered by insurance that your doctor accepts (an ever shrinking list) or come up with a whole bunch of cash up front. Otherwise they face the choice that we did with our dog. Find the money or go home and hope you don’t die.
All of the fact-free ranting about Obamacare has mainly succeeded in distracting Americans and keeping many of us from coming to grips with what a total disaster our current health care system has become. A comparison with Canada (which has socialized medicine) shows that we spend about 60 percent more per capita on health care than they do. And yet, our infant mortality rates and life expectancy is far worse than theirs.
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen cites a CIA study that shows the U.S. ranking first in the world in health care costs and 49th in life expectancy and 47th in infant mortality. His piece on the subject is well worth reading.
On top of that, about half of all personal bankruptcies in the U.S. — millions a year — are due to health care costs. People who don’t have the money choose to spend it anyway to save their loved ones or themselves. Who do they think they are?
To make matters worse, most of them have financed those life-saving treatments by maxing out multiple credit cards which has only hastened their slide into bankruptcy.
Meanwhile, in Canada there are zero bankruptcies due to health care costs.
Reasonable people can disagree about how to best fix our broken system. But right now, Republicans seem to be only focused on undoing Obama’s efforts to make things better — and undoing Obama altogether.
Let’s be honest.
Our health care system is one of many things that are driving us broke — not because of freeloaders or illegals or whatever your definition of Obamacare might be. It’s because the rest of us are living much longer than we were supposed to. The whole system was financially based on the assumption that we would work until we were 65 or so and live a few years after that before succumbing to old age and/or diseases. Today, many of the members of my golf club are over 80 and some of them can beat me scratch. We all have relatives who are in their 90s and are doing just fine.
They paid in a little and are taking out five and ten and twenty times as much in benefits. Many of them are retired and been net takers for almost as long as they worked and paid into the system. A bipartisan committee has just recommended that benefits to retirees be cut significantly in the future as part of our effort to get out of debt but polls show that most of us and our elected officials just don’t want to go that route.
We’d apparently rather get angry and outraged at blacks and Mexicans and single mothers and poor people. And, of course, Obama.
I tried to explain this all to Kiva but he just licked my face and begged for a treat. I’m not giving him anything until he learns to bark at Glenn Beck.