
How do we read coverage to date of the momentous events in Egypt?
To say that official Egyptian media have been in a time warp since the troubles began would be understating matters.
A sign carried by a demonstrator in Cairo’s Tahrir Square read: “Egyptian media don’t see, don’t hear, they just talk.”
It was right on the mark.
Watching state-run Nile TV, a viewer could easily be misled into thinking the upheaval was one-sided, simply a plot to undermine the Egyptian regime, and totally lacking in context.
At first it reported the outbreak of anti-government demonstrations as limited action by a few dozen protesters demanding social and economic changes.
It also referred to widespread popular rejection of the actions of “the few who claim to represent the Egyptian people.”
As a result, Nile TV reporter Shahira Amin walked out when she refused to continue broadcasting the official lies and was hailed for her courage.
“The state media is a disgrace,” said Laila, an Egyptian friend with whom I was chatting online despite spotty Internet service in Cairo.
She believed the army would settle the standoff with President Hosni Mubarak by Friday at the latest to end his 30-year hold on power.
Meanwhile, Arab and international media were tripping over themselves and each other to cover, and comment on, the unfolding story, whose end remains unclear while a tottering sclerotic regime desperately tried to hang on.
The visuals have been gripping: bloodied demonstrators, journalists scurrying about to report (and keep safe), pro-government secret police accused of attacking unarmed civilians adding fuel to the fire, and, an army observing from the sidelines at this writing.
It’s the “war of the channels” wrote Malek Alqaaqour in the pan-Arab daily Al Hayat, criticizing unnamed Arab news outlets of unprofessional and unfair coverage.
Nevertheless, the Arab media’s effort is “immense and deserves admiration, as the professional compass sometimes goes off-course during storms,” he