
For those of us who care deeply about science literacy and who work to create an appropriate, and respectful, understanding between science and religion, Rick Perry’s entry into the Republican presidential race offers both good and bad news.
On the positive side, Perry has decided not to run away from his past. With the exception of his position on vaccinations for the human papillomavirus, he is embracing rather than distancing himself from his previous record making it very easy to recognize where he stands.
On the negative side, his past record clearly demonstrates both a dangerous misunderstanding of the nature of science and a willingness to jettison science when its conclusions are at odds with his politics.
Perry’s stance on the theory of evolution is especially troubling and emblematic of his overall disdain for modern science. Simply put, Perry’s position either represents willful ignorance of both science and the law or demonstrates that he lacks basic knowledge that fifth graders should have.
Just this past Thursday in New Hampshire, in response to a child’s question, Perry described evolution as “a theory that’s out there” and one that’s “got some gaps in it.” His latest statement is remarkably similar to what his office wrote to a Texas voter in 2006 when questioned about intelligent design: “Recognizing that evolution is a theory, and not claimed by anyone to be more than that, the governor believes it would be a disservice to our children to teach them only one theory on the origin of our existence without recognizing other scientific theories worth consideration.”
As any well-educated fifth grader could tell you, in science, a “theory” is as good as it



