
You really can’t get more egg on your face than Barack Obama’s neoliberal Beltway apologists have after his big speech in Kansas. That’s because a portion of the speech reads as if the president were channeling the pundits’ nemesis, the political psychologist and consultant Drew Westen.
Last August 7 Westen’s essay, “What Happened to Obama’s Passion?,” landed in The New York Times like “a rhetorical nuke dropped on ground zero in the liberal heartland,” wrote the blogger Andrew Sprung at the time in a post titled, none too gently, “A Lover of Fairy Tales Casts Obama as Villain in Chief.”
Sprung’s title encapsulated the reaction to Westen by keepers of the neoliberal Beltanschaunng, or Beltway worldview, such as Fareed Zakaria and Jonathan Chait, who, as I showed at length right here, mocked what Chait called “Westen’s lengthy, attention-grabbing… parody of liberal fantasizing.”
Deriding appeals by Westen (and me, on July 29, in “How and How Not to Rate Obama’s Leadership Now”) for presidential story-telling like Teddy Roosevelt’s about the folly of de-regulating capitalism, they singled him out for imagining that, as Chait sneered, “every known impediment to the legislative process–special interest lobbying, the filibuster, macroeconomic conditions, …. [the] settled beliefs of public opinion–are but tiny stick huts trembling in the face of the atomic bomb of the presidential speech.”
“Americans pay hardly any attention to what presidents say, and what little they take in, they forget almost immediately,” explained Chait, too young, perhaps, to recall the Great Communicator, Ronald