Tag: Bill Mckibben

Mar
27

The Clean Energy Revolution Wont Be About Clean Energy

by , under NEWS
The Clean Energy Revolution Wont Be About Clean Energy

The uprisings in the Middle East and the growing austerity-induced unrest among workers in the US and Europe have provided new hope for environmental movement leaders who for years have struggled to mobilize the pubic to confront the looming catastrophes of growth-capitalism.
A good example is climate leader and 350.org founder, Bill McKibben. In February, McKibben authored a short blog post celebrating Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s decision to step down. He wrote of the revolution as a teachable moment for the climate movement, suggesting that if “a real people’s movement” could bring down an apparently immovable tyrant like Mubarak a similar movement could bring down the fossil fuel giants.
McKibben is right. As the overlords of the current world order, fossil fuel companies do have a lot to fear from a powerful popular

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Mar
01

Green News Report March 1 2011 Audio

by , under NEWS
Green News Report March 1 2011 Audio

TWITTER: @GreenNewsReport.
The ‘GNR’ is also now available on your cell phone via Stitcher Radio’s mobile app!.
IN TODAY’S RADIO REPORT: Dems call for probe in U.S. Chamber of Commerce plot to target citizens like us; Indictment in WV coal mine disaster investigation; Deepwater drilling permits resume in the Gulf, but that’s still not good enough for Republicans; Climate scientists in fake ‘ClimateGate Scandal’ vindicated — AGAIN; PLUS: More on the WI GOP power play to privatize Wisconsin’s power plants … All that and more in today’s Green News Report!
Got comments, tips, love letters, hate mail? Drop us a line at GreenNews@BradBlog.com or right here at the comments link below. All GNRs are always archived at GreenNews.BradBlog.com.
IN ‘GREEN NEWS EXTRA’ (see links below): NYT “fracking” bombshell: toxic & radioactive water dumped in rivers; US

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Feb
18

Weekly Mulch Chevron Must Pay GOP Tries to Gut the EPA

by , under NEWS
Weekly Mulch Chevron Must Pay GOP Tries to Gut the EPA

By Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger
A Bolivian judge ordered Chevron this week to pay $8.6 billion in damages for polluting the Amazon rainforest from 1964 until 1990. The payout is the second largest ever in an environmental case, with only the damages BP agreed to pay in the wake of last summer’s Deepwater Horizon spill being higher. Environmental lawyers and advocates hailed the case as a landmark victory, but as Rebecca Tarbotton reports at AlterNet, Chevron is still planning to fight the case. “In fact, the oil giant has repeatedly refused to pay for a clean up even if ordered to by the court,” she

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Jan
20

Life on Planet Eaarth An Interview with Environmental Activist Bill McKibben

by , under NEWS
Life on Planet Eaarth An Interview with Environmental Activist Bill McKibben

Bill McKibben is a leading American environmental writer and activist. Over the last two decades he has helped to educate and mobilize untold numbers of people on issues of global warming, alternative energy sources and localized economies. In 2010, Time magazine described him as “the world’s best green journalist.” In 2009, his organization, 350.org, planned what Foreign Policy magazine described as “the largest ever global coordinated rally of any kind,” with 5,200 simultaneous demonstrations in 181 countries.
As part of my preparation for the Jewish holiday of Tu B’Shvat — the Jewish New Year of the Trees (celebrated this year on

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Jan
19

Localization The Film

by , under NEWS
Localization The Film

What An Inconvenient Truth did for understanding climate change, a new film, The Economics of Happiness, is sure to do for understanding localization versus globalization. Even for those who are well versed in the negative effects of globalization, this film will further expose the systemic structures that drive the machine. But the film also offers hope in examples of the ways that localization could save us. I know of no other film that so clearly explains both of these divergent paths into the future.
Interspersed with interviews with some of the leading ecologists and thinkers of our time (Bill McKibben, David Korten, Vandana Shiva, Richard Heinberg,

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
25

The Biggest Election Showdown is WHERE

by , under NEWS
The Biggest Election Showdown is WHERE

Michael Pollan said “For the food movement,” this may be “the most important election this year.” Slow Food chef Kurt Michael Friese named it, The Most Important Race You Never Heard Of. And Change.org wrote, “There are a lot of important face-offs going on throughout the country, but none may be more important to farmers and food activists than the race in Iowa for Secretary of Agriculture.”
We’re talking Francis Thicke versus incumbent Bill Northey. It’s the archetypal challenge between cutting edge farming methods that can create a healthy and sustainable agricultural system (that’s Thicke, pronounced tick-ee), versus industrial methods that push top soil into our streams, animals into confinements, toxins into our environment, and farmers off the land (that’s Northey, pronounced Monsanto).
The race is statistically a dead heat. If Thicke wins, Food. Inc. director Robert Kenner says he will be “a game changer who can fix our agricultural system.” Grist says, “it would be a huge win not only for sustainable agriculture in Iowa, but the nation. And it would send a clear message to Congress as lobbyists and activists begin putting on their battle overalls for the next Farm Bill.”
Although this sounds like a lot to expect from one small state election for Ag Secretary, it’s not just any state, and it’s not just any candidate. “Iowa is one of our agricultural heavyweights,” says the Iowa Independent, which also predicts that Congress will definitely pay attention to whoever wins this election.”
“Iowa has always focused the nation’s agricultural vision,” says author Bill McKibben, who founded the global climate change organization 350.org. “We need Francis Thicke,” he says, “to help frame that new vision, right in the middle of the Heartland.”
According to Fred Kirschenmann, a father of the sustainable farming movement, “Thicke’s vision for Iowa agriculture is informed by his own experience as a farmer and by his academic study and research.”
Farmer, Scientist, and Policy Maker
For the past 27 years, Francis Thicke has run a successful organic dairy farm just outside my little town in Southeast Iowa. Folks here know and love his Radiance Dairy milk, yogurt, cheese, and ice cream, which Francis processes right on his property. In fact, local restaurants post signs bragging that they use Radiance Dairy. Francis has got the small town farmer thing down.
But Francis is also a scientist. He has a PhD in agronomy and a masters in soil science. Moreover, he has applied his expertise advising numerous state and national government committees, agricultural universities, extension agents, and research organizations over the past three decades. He has served on so many groups and is so deeply connected with the nation’s farmers, that whenever I speak at farm organizations anywhere in the country and mention where I’m from, people invariably say with a warm smile, “Well you must know my friend Francis Thicke.”
Yes I’m proud to say that I’ve known Francis for many years. And although I thought I knew him pretty well, when I started his book A New Vision for Iowa Food and Agriculture (free download), I realized just how brilliant he was and how pivotal he can be. On the one hand, he manages the intricate systems on his own farm, including a solar powered watering system and a cow grazing program that “mimics the prairiegrass/bison ecology that contributed to building the Midwest’s deep, fertile prairie soils.” On the other hand, Francis lays out practical and proven strategies for a complete agricultural makeover, where successful farmers can grow fuel, boost the economy, and contribute healthy delicious food to local communities. As Food, Inc’s Kenner says, “Francis Thicke has a vision of how our agricultural system can work that will benefit our communities, our farmers and the consumer.”
“When one combines a scholarly understanding with on-the-farm practice,” says The Land Institute’s Wes Jackson about Thicke, “it’s hard to beat.” That’s the hope of those working round the clock in the week before the election.
But they are reminded of Northey’s dark tactics used in the final days of his last election. Trailing behind another organic farmer, he poured lots of big-Ag’s money into a smear campaign, which allowed him to just squeak by on Election Day. And apparently he’s been paying them back ever since.
Will Iowans re-enlist an Agriculture Secretary who is a mouthpiece for huge corporations, or will they go for Thicke’s “New Vision?” Author and legend Wendell Berry says, “I think we need people who take agriculture seriously, for a change, and I trust Francis Thicke to take it seriously.”
Jim Hightower, a well-known populist, himself the former Agricultural Commissioner of Texas, says:
I hope Northey doesn’t take Jim’s recommendation seriously. I’ve visited Brazil many times and they already have far too many Monsanto men running the show. And for that matter, so do we. I’m looking forward to finding out on November 2nd how many Iowan’s agree.
Jeffrey M. Smith is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and the international bestselling author of Seeds of Deception and Genetic Roulette. He has seen first hand how the corporate driven industrial agriculture model, embodied by Monsanto and promoted by their hand-picked candidates, has devastated farmers, economies, and ecosystems around the world.

This Blogger’s Books from
Seeds of Deception: Exposing Industry and Government Lies About the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Foods You’re Eating
by Jeffrey M. Smith
Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods
by Jeffrey M. Smith

Follow Jeffrey Smith on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/JeffreyMSmith

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Oct
10

The 101010 Global Work Party Kicks Off

by , under NEWS
The 101010 Global Work Party Kicks Off

We’re sitting here in the temporary 350.org HQ in Washington, DC watching photos stream in from all over the world. They’re all a part of today’s 10/10/10 Global Work Party, the biggest day of climate action in the planets history.
About half of the 7,000 events in 188 countries have taken place already. People greeted the sunrise in New Zealand, raced to clean up trash in Beijing, planted thousands of mangroves in the Philippines, installed solar panels in South Africa and Namibia, marched by the thousands in Istanbul, and more.
The best news? There’s still much more to come. All around the world, across race and nation, we’re sending a clear message to our politicians: we’re getting to work, now it’s your turn.
Take a look at some of the photos and please help spread the word:
Wellington, New Zealand
1 of 17
Adorable Or Ugly? Controversial Pets And Wild Animals (PHOTOS)
Daseep The Tiger Cub: Baby Sumatra Tiger Born To Mother Previously Thought To Be Infertile (PHOTOS)
Census Of Marine Life: Decade-Long International Effort Completed, Shows Connectedness Of Oceanic Creatures Across The World (PHOTOS)
How To Plant Garlic (PHOTOS)
James Hansen Arrested With 100 Others At Mountaintop Removal Mining Protest In DC (PHOTOS)
Adorable Miniature Animals: The Smallest Version of Animals You Know And Love (PHOTOS)
The sun rises on 10/10/10 on the east coast of New Zealand
comments(0)
<>
Total comments: 0 | Post a Comment
Rate This Slide
Rank #2 | Average: 8.6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Current Top 5 Slides
loading…
Choose your Top 5 Slides
UserName
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Top User Slides
<>
| Become a fan
Picked These as the Top 5 Slides in the Slideshow
loading…
Users who voted on this slide
<>
loading…

Follow Bill McKibben on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/billmckibben

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Oct
06

Maldives President Nasheed Installs Solar on Official Residence Knocks Ignorance of Climate Deniers

by , under NEWS
Maldives President Nasheed Installs Solar on Official Residence Knocks Ignorance of Climate Deniers

Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed, who once famously held a cabinet meeting underwater to draw attention to climate change, is installing a solar photovoltaic (PV) system on his official residence this week.
Donated by Sungevity, an Oakland, California based solar company, the Maldives’ PV system is grid-connected and will generate about 15,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) per annum, providing half of the residence’s power needs, according to Sungevity founder Danny Kennedy, whose company donated and designed the installation for the Maldives’ presidential palace. South Korean company LG donated the PV modules, while the three inverters were provided by Germany manufacturer Kaco, and the mounting hardware by Ironridge.
Sungevity estimates the system will save the Maldives $300,000 over its 25-year expected lifespan. The system will go online tomorrow.
Kennedy’s company has made a similar bid to put solar on the U.S. White House for free, and started the Globama petition that garnered over 50,000 signatures. The petition and offer were hand-delivered to President Obama last month by 350.org founder Bill McKibben, who traveled to Washington with a group of students from Maine’s Unity College in an attempt to return one of former President Jimmy Carter’s solar panels to the White House roof. They were rebuked at that time, although yesterday the White House did finally announce plans to put solar back on the roof at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in the near future.
Maldives President Nasheed says his country could not afford to delay another minute, with climate disruptions already impacting the tiny island nation 200 miles south southwest of the Southern tip of India. Its highest point is only 2.4 meters above sea-level, leaving residents at extreme risk from rising sea levels caused by global climate change.
“For the Maldives, climate change is a real challenge. It is not a problem in the future, it is a problem that we are facing every day. We have more than 16 islands that are facing serious erosion problems. We are having to relocate people from one island to another. We also have serious water contamination issues due to saltwater intrusion, which lead to food security issues as well,” President Nasheed said today on a call with media.
“For us it is an issue of life or death,” Mr. Nasheed said.
I asked President Nasheed what he thought about the criticism lodged by those who deny the science of climate change who often argue that renewable energy sources like solar are too expensive to warrant investment.
Drawing an anology to his grandfather, whom he said didn’t believe that man had landed on the moon, Nasheed said:
“There is very little we can do for that kind of ignorance, other than consistently trying to tell them that there is no doubt about the science about it.”
“You really have to be more intelligent about it. And it’s very difficult for me to be telling the people of the United States, ‘try to have a better grip on knowledge,’” Nasheed said with a chuckle.
“To be going on with the obsolete technology is, in my mind, madness,” Nasheed said.
Sungevity founder Kennedy described President Nasheed as “a climate justice champion” who is “willing to roll up his sleeves and get involved, installing a money-saving solution to climate change.”
“The [350.org] Global Work Party begins with this installation,” Kennedy said of the Maldives project.
350.org has tallied over 6,000 events in 184 countries happening this weekend as part of the group’s 10.10.10 Global Work Party to demonstrate commitment to global climate action.

Follow Brendan DeMelle on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/bdemelle

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Sep
21

Green News Report September 21 2010 Audio

by , under NEWS
Green News Report September 21 2010 Audio

TWITTER: @GreenNewsReport.
The ‘GNR’ is also now available on your cell phone via Stitcher Radio’s mobile app!
IN TODAY’S RADIO REPORT: Ding dong the BP well is DEAD, but the disaster lives on; Jimmy Carter was right; Solar panels on the White House?; PLUS: Get ready for Frankenfish!!! … All that and more in today’s Green News Report!
Got comments, tips, love letters, hate mail? Drop us a line at GreenNews@BradBlog.com or right here at the comments link below. All GNRs are always archived at GreenNews.BradBlog.com.
IN ‘GREEN NEWS EXTRA’ (see links below): Massey mine failed dust-control standards; Renewable Electricity Standard gets another chance; Mining’s Final Frontier: the deep sea; Walmart unveils thin solar roof panels on stores; Spending blocked for Capitol charging stations; Justice slams FBI probes of environmental groups; How Hillary Clinton’s clean stoves will help African women; World’s largest mining company says ‘We Must Move Away from Coal’; World’s largest solar plant wins key approval in CA; Are climate change skeptics just naturally gullible?; Clean Air Act by the numbers; Gas pipeline regulator’s industry ties…PLUS: Researchers find future temperatures could exceed livable limits …
‘Green News Report’ is heard on many fine radio stations around the country. For additional info on stories we covered today, plus today’s ‘Green News Extra’, please click right here…

Follow Brad Friedman and Desi Doyen on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/TheBradBlog

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Sep
14

Former UN Climate Chief is Wrong Strong C02 Targets are Essential

by , under NEWS
Former UN Climate Chief is Wrong Strong C02 Targets are Essential

Former UN climate chief, Yvo de Boer, gave an interview today to Bloomberg News arguing that the debate over C02 targets is largely “irrelevant” in the UN climate process. Here’s why he’s wrong.
A frank discussion about science-based targets (like reducing the concentration of C02 in our atmosphere below 350 parts per million) is key not only to summoning the necessary ambition to tackle global warming, but also to maintain the credibility of the UN climate negotiations. Big polluters cannot be allowed to perpetuate the idea that weak targets will avert catastrophe. There is currently 392 ppm C02 in our atmosphere and this year we’ve seen Pakistan underwater, Russia on fire, and, most recently, tens of thousands of walruses are forced to shore by melting sea ice. Can anyone really claim that 450 ppm of C02 is safe for our planet?
Yvo de Boer dismisses the importance of targets because he feels that first, big polluters won’t increase their level of ambition and second, that the debates over targets contributed to the failure to reach an agreement in Copenhagen.
Sure, it’s going to be tough to push countries like the US to take action, but letting them off the hook guarantees failure. Instead, we need to build a movement that can push our countries to summon the courage and leadership necessary to take on climate change. On 10/10/10, we’ll be getting to work on climate solutions in thousands of communities around the world and pressuring our leaders to get to work, as well. Speaking clearly and strongly about what the world needs to do to stop the climate crisis — lowering C02 below 350 ppm — helps build that movement and keep up the pressure on countries to increase their ambition to meet what science says is necessary.
As for the failure in Copenhagen, it wasn’t the push for strong targets that stalled progress: it was the refusal of rich countries like the US to show anything resembling leadership. As the world’s largest historic emitter, the US should have arrived in Copenhagen ready to make strong commitments. Instead, it repeatedly blocked progress and worked to undermine the credibility of the UN by entering into secretive side negotiations with other large polluters. If the push for strong targets blocked anything, it blocked the passage of the weak, compromised Copenhagen Accord that contained no serious commitments from big emitters.
Together, we’ve made incredible progress building a movement behind the real solutions that science and justice demand. Last October 24, you organized over 5,200 events in more than 180 countries to build support for the 350 ppm target. Thanks to your hard work, the number “350″ made it onto the front pages of newspapers around the world — CNN called October 24 the “most widespread day of political action in the planet’s history.” That publicity payed off: in Copenhagen, 112 countries adopted the 350 ppm C02 target, many of them for the first time. Just as important, targets like 550 or 700 parts per million disappeared from the negotiations completely. By building a movement around strong targets, we were able to turn the talks back towards what science says is necessary.
If last year we set the target, this year we’re showing how to get there. There are already 10/10/10 work parties planned in more than 130 countries. We’re making the future visible today: showing the types of solutions necessary to get us back to 350 ppm as quickly as possible.
The more successful are, the more the forces of the status-quo are going to push back. Over the coming months, you’ll see big polluters and bored bureaucrats trying to downplay expectations for international climate negotiations. You’ll see more talk about the declining importance of, you know, doing what’s necessary. The tough part is: science and chemistry don’t negotiate. They’ve set the target at 350 ppm and we need to figure out how to get there.
Yvo de Boer may be tired of pushing countries to raise their ambition, but we’re just getting started here at 350.org. We’re not going to give up on what science and justice demand. We’re going to get to work.
Cross posted from Itsgettinghotinhere.org

Follow Jamie Henn on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/agent350

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Sep
10

Shovels and Ballots Getting to Work on 101010

by , under NEWS
Shovels and Ballots Getting to Work on 101010

After major disappointments in Copenhagen and Washington D.C., millions of us concerned about the climate crisis have been left wondering “what now?”. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and the political and infrastructural challenges so large and complex, that it’s no surprise to see soul-searching and disagreements over the best course of action. Especially when legislative and diplomatic efforts to date have fallen flat.
When folks like Dave Roberts — who fiercely advocated for admittedly weak Cap & Trade legislation because he felt that it was our best hope for progress — have given up on the nation’s capitol, it’s clear that a lot of people are being forced to re-evaluate.
The Debate – Scale Vs. Feasibility
It’s understandable why activists invested so much to securing a binding diplomatic agreement in Copenhagen and legislation in Washington, D.C. Their belief was that only a coordinated, international policy mechanism could address a crisis that is, by its very nature, global in scope. They’re right. But negotiating such a response is akin to getting 192 drug addicts to check-in to rehab, when treatment won’t start until everyone shows up.
Believing this is a fool’s errand — unlikely to work, at least with the result being anything meaningful — others have advocated for concentrating on where we’re more likely to make progress: the personal and community scale. But reducing your carbon footprint to nil, or even that of an entire city or state, is not going to keep the climatic forces away if elsewhere they continue to burn coal or deforest the Amazon. Unless someone can invent the dome from Stephen King’s imagination.
It’s easy to pick holes in each of these strategies because the sad truth is that none are likely, on their own, to be commensurate with the scale of the challenge. Which is why I think it’s our expectations, not approaches, that need to change.
Practicing Resilience
The first expectation shift is to move our thinking away from trying to “solve” this crisis to “responding” to it. This may sound like a difference without a distinction, but it’s fundamental to the approach we should take, particularly when climate is so inextricably connected to the concurrent economic and energy challenges we face. In attempting to “solve” a problem like climate change, we’re looking for a miracle that’s going to allow us to get back to business as usual. In trying to “respond” to it, however, we acknowledge that business as usual is no longer an option. This is clearly necessary for a number of reasons:
The cat is already out of the bag when it comes to climate change. We’ve already altered the climate, even if we completely stop using fossil fuels this very second. Hence the planetary name change, a la PCI Fellow Bill McKibben. Some level of adaptation is required, though how much is still in our control.
As our report Searching for a Miracle details, no known combination of alternatives can fully replace our current use of fossil fuels.
Even if we could somehow to discover and bring online a clean energy alternative at sufficient scale and speed, there are numerous other limits that will prevent business as usual from continuing.
Redundancy, adaptability, and experimentation are going to be key in how we respond to this and other crises.
Both/And
The second thing to understand is that it needn’t be — indeed it shouldn’t be — an either/or proposition. It’s a both/and proposition. When done right, efforts at different levels can amplify one another and are iterative. This can even be true when groups reasonably respond to the same opportunities in totally different ways.
For example, some of our friends in the UK are considering holding a “Great Stay At Home” during the COP 16 meetings in Cancun, Mexico in late November and early December 2010. The idea, as articulated by Transition founder and PCI Fellow Rob Hopkins right after COP 15 last year, was this:
I think this a fantastic idea. But does that mean that NGOs and environmental activists should all boycott COP 16? Absolutely not. Without allies in Cancun to bear witness, keep delegates’ feet to the fire, and push for meaningful international agreements then the odds of delegates paying any heed would be close to nil. And conversely, when delegates attempt to hide behind excuses about political or technical feasibility, our friends in Cancun can point to what’s being done right then back at home by everyday citizens with shovels, caulk guns, and bicycles.
Done right, these two approaches can be greater than the sum of their parts. If there’s anything that gives my cynicism pause, it’s the possibility of divergent efforts like these amplifying rather than defusing one another.
And that is why I want to encourage every single person out there to get involved in a 10/10/10 Global Work Party. No, Glenn Beck, it’s not some International Neo-Communist Party. It’s hundreds of thousands of people in more than a 140 countries making a statement by getting their hands dirty. As our friends from 350.org explained:
Part of what I love about 10/10/10 is that even if actions fail to move politicians sufficiently, through these projects a foundation can be laid — no matter how small or simple the projects — for transitioning each and every community. Yes, it’s a focused day of international action. Yes, it’s intended to make a statement. But it can and should also serve as the start or boost for ongoing resilience building.
10/10/10 Sonoma County
The 350.org site has some ideas and resources for creating a project (including starting a Transition Initiative) but I wanted to share what we’re doing here in Post Carbon Institute’s home base to give folks just one example of what can be done.
PCI is part of an ad hoc coalition of local nonprofits and the County that set as our vision: “10 Issues. 10 Communities. 10,000 People.” Because of the short time frame and the unique characteristics of the county (nine cities and a number of smaller towns, with a population that’s generally progressive and climate aware), our intention was to encourage grassroots groups throughout Sonoma County to take the lead in organizing local projects. We’re fortunate to have a number of grassroots organizations spread throughout the County who are already doing great work. As organizers, our strategy is simply to provide the framework and tools to facilitate, promote, and support projects.
That said, it’s vitally important to us to use 10/10/10 as an opportunity to engage people in longer-term and more robust efforts. And so we set for ourselves the following goals:
To educate the community about the impacts global climate change and our dependence on fossil fuels has on virtually every aspect of our lives and the countless, concrete ways we can break this addiction. So we’ve named 10 issues that are directly impacted by or relate to the climate crisis: biodiversity; buildings; economy; energy; food; health; social/economic justice; transportation; waste; and water.
To organize a minimum of one project focused on each issue area and at least one project in 10 Sonoma County communities.
To provide participants with suggestions and resources for personal actions they can take in each issue area to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and their impact on the climate. A website will provide people with a way to make reduction pledges, as will each project site.
To get the participation of elected officials in each of the nine Sonoma County cities, as well as the County Board of Supervisors. We don’t want them making speeches. We want them to get their hands dirty alongside their constituents.
To use this weekend as a vehicle for ongoing engagement.
The most ambitious effort will likely take place in Santa Rosa, the largest city in the county. Our friends at the newly formed CAReFree Sunday Street Scene (part of the growing international Ciclovia movement) are working with the City of Santa Rosa to close off a major section of downtown for biking, walking, and entertainment. Along the route — which includes City Hall, Luther Burbank Home & Gardens, and a greenway along the Santa Rosa Creek — they hope to set up ten projects (one for each issue referenced above) where pedestrians can stop, participate, and learn. The folks at CAReFree Sunday Street Scene have been talking with organizers of Tour de France cyclist and Santa Rosa native Levi Leipheimer’s Gran Fondo bike event, which takes place the day before, about staying to join in the ciclovia. Hopefully, with creative project ideas like this, we’ll meet our target of 10,000 participants.
We’ll know in a few weeks how successful this organizing effort was, but the key thing is also the simplest thing: Try something. So please visit 350.org today to find a project in your community. If one doesn’t exist, start one.

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
Sep
07

Why Obama Should Put Solar Back on the White House Roof

by , under NEWS
Why Obama Should Put Solar Back on the White House Roof

As I write this piece, we’re in the midst of a (biodiesel) road trip to Washington, D.C., towing behind us an unwieldy piece of history: a solar panel off the roof of the Carter White House. It’s decades old, though it still makes hot water just fine. In a sense, we’re traveling backward–which in another sense is what I think we’re going to have to do for a while in the U.S. climate movement.
The bad news everyone knows. The strongest attempt ever to pass climate legislation through the U.S. Congress came up short earlier this summer. The inside-the-Beltway green groups took what seemed to be the route of least resistance: a very tame piece of climate legislation larded with special prizes for special interests. They worked it as hard as it could have been worked–and in the end it didn’t even come close. The fossil fuel industry and their allies in D.C. barely had to break a sweat shooting it down.
So–barring some unforeseen development–we’re not going to see significant action on the federal level about climate for at least the next two years.
And that means we’re far less likely to see significant international action on climate, since it’s hard for other governments to muster the political will to make tough choices when the U.S. is punting.
So what do we do with those two years? I think we use them to build a movement, which explains the solar panel we’re hauling south from Maine.
The story is painful even to consider. This panel went up on the White House roof in 1979, with then-president Jimmy Carter (in a wide tie, and with a bushy haircut) promising that it would still be there in the year 2000, producing hot water from the sun for whoever was then president. In fact, it didn’t make it through the next decade–it came down in the Reagan years, a symbol of our decision to turn away from the idea of limits and veer sharply down the path we’ve trod ever since.
But not everyone went along. Frugal folks at Unity College in Maine salvaged the panels, and put them up on the cafeteria, where they continued to produce hot water for the next three decades. Meanwhile, around the world other nations took the technology and went to work. Germany and Japan took over the lead in photovoltaic panels, but solar thermal technology like this became the special province of the Chinese.
I sat not long ago with Huang Ming, China’s leading solar entrepreneur, in his space-age Sun Moon Mansion in Shandong Province looking over the stats: his HiMin Solar Energy Group has put up 60 million such systems across China–he estimated that when 250 million Chinese take a shower, the hot water is coming off their roofs. In a biting symbol of that passed torch, he keeps one of the Carter panels in his private museum.
There’s no question what we should have spent the last few decades doing. But there’s no point now in crying about why we didn’t: the only job is to try to get back in the game, to start catching up.
Some of that means spending the money so that we can make the next technological discoveries. Many, including the Breakthrough Institute and Bill Gates, are calling for big increases in R and D funding, which might help us somehow claw our way back toward the front of the parade.
But catching up also means making use of the technology we already have, in ways both practical and symbolic. We’re headed for the White House with this old panel, and with a promise from the U.S. company Sungevity that it will supply all the brand-new panels the president could ever want–as long as he puts them up on his roof where everyone can see them. George W. Bush, amazingly enough, actually put some solar back in the White House grounds–on the roof of a maintenance shed, and on, who knew, the Presidental Spa and Cabana. But since he didn’t tell anyone, they didn’t do much good. We want them up there on the roof, as visible as the White House garden, which helped boost seed sales 30 percent across the nation the year Michelle planted it.
So far, we haven’t heard a word from the White House about whether they’ll accept the gift and make the promise or not–which, frankly, surprises me. I can’t think of a clearer win for the president, a better reminder to the legions of young people who worked on his campaign that he is still focused on the future. He owes environmentalists more than he’s given them–by all accounts he decided not to push for the Senate legislation. He’s up against tough odds in Congress, of course, given the obstructionist GOP. But they can’t filibuster his roof.
What’s especially poignant is that we have gotten promises from other, much less likely, world leaders–Mohammed Nasheed, for instance, president of the entirely Muslim and quite poor Maldive Islands, the low-lying Indian Ocean nation that faces inundation from rising seas. He took the Sungevity offer, and he’ll be putting solar panels on his roof on October 10 (10-10-10), the same day that thousands of groups around the world will be participating in a massive Global Work Party, putting up wind turbines and laying out bike paths. The same day we want Barack Obama, sleeves rolled up, out on his roof with a wrench.
The point of all these panels, of course, is not that we’re going to solve climate change one roof at a time. (Obama is doing lots of good practical things already–his “greening the government” effort is retrofitting federal buildings across the country with insulation, for instance). The point is that they help build the movement that we allowed to wither away.
Environmentalists lost sight of just how big a movement that would need to be. Too many groups convinced themselves that they could slide some legislation through Congress, make deals with industry, get things going without a fight. It was worth a try, but it didn’t work–the fossil fuel industry, the most profitable enterprise known to man, beat us. And they will beat us again and again until there’s a real, broad-based, popular, noisy movement underway in this country, a movement that can provide a currency (bodies, passion) equal to the currency the billionaire Koch Brothers can pony up to defeat climate legislation.
Some of that movement will go on at the local level, as we transform cities and towns and show what can be done. Some will be done on college campuses like Unity College, or Middlebury where I teach, which are showing the way forward. Some of it will be done in jails–I’d be very surprised if civil disobedience doesn’t become a bigger part of this battle in the years ahead, if only because it’s the tool we use to show our society how urgent, morally and practically, this crisis really is.
But some of it must be done symbolically. And there’s no more symbolic piece of real estate on this continent than the White House. Let’s hope that on the 10th of October it, at least, is transformed. It’s been a long, hot summer, in the capitol as in much of the northern hemisphere. Let’s make sure that next year that heat is put to some purpose–heating the Obamas’ bathtub, and helping power up a movement.
Originally posted on Yale Environment 360.

Follow Bill McKibben on Twitter:
www.twitter.com/billmckibben

Source:www.huffingtonpost.com

Go straight to Post

Comments Offread more
© Copyright All Global News on One Page 2011. All rights reserved.